Abstract
Lingual orthodontic treatment is indicated for adults who do not want appliance show. Considering the limitation of tissue response in adults, precision tooth movement without round-tripping is crucial. Moreover, in order to camouflage underlying skeletal discrepancies, translation-type tooth movement rather than tipping is essential. For those, adequate segmentation of the dental arch and specific goal-oriented movement of each segment can be helpful. Since maxillary palatal area is characterized by various insertion sites for the miniscrews, combination of the miniscrew position and various lever arms for preliminary segmental movement effectively eliminates the round-tripping, providing a reliable lingual treatment protocol in adults with periodontal complication or temporomandibular joint resorption. A typical inconsistent movement such as total arch displacement is also attainable. The biomechanical backgrounds and applications are explained and demonstrated.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Salonen L, et al. Need and demand for orthodontic treatment in an adult Swedish population. Eur J Orthod. 1992;14(5):359–68.
Hohoff A, et al. Evaluation of the parameters underlying the decision by adult patients to opt for lingual therapy: an international comparison. J Orofac Orthop. 2003;64(2):135–44.
Melsen B. Current controversies in orthodontics. 1st ed. Quintessence Publishing Co. Inc, Chicago, Illinois. 1991. p. 147–56.
Tanne K, Koenig HA, Burstone CJ. Moment to force ratios and the center of rotation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988;94:426–31.
Kojima Y, Mizuno T, Fukui H. A numerical simulation of tooth movement produced by molar uprighting spring. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2007;132:630–8.
Burstone CJ, Koenig HA. Force systems from the ideal arch. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1974;65:270–89.
Burstone CJ. Rationale of the segmented arch. Am J Orthod. 1962;48:805–22.
Shalish M, Cooper-Kazaz R, Ivgi I, Canetti L, Tsur B, Bachar E, Chaushu S. Adult patients’ adjustability to orthodontic appliances. Part I: a comparison between Labial, Lingual, and InvisalignTM. Eur J Orthod. 2012;34(6):724-30.
Kravitz ND, et al. How well does Invisalign work? A prospective clinical study evaluating the efficacy of tooth movement with invisalign. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;135:27–35.
Joffe L. Current products and practice, invisalignR: early experiences. J Orthod. 2003;30:348–52.
Egolf RJ, BeGole EA, Upshaw HS. Factors associated with orthodontic patient compliance with intraoral elastic and headgear wear. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990;97(4):336–48.
Grauer D, Proffit WR. Accuracy in tooth positioning with a fully customized lingual orthodontic appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2011;140:433–43.
Mazdyasna S, Stoner JE. Factors influencing gingival recession in the lower incisor region. Proc Br Paedod Soc. 1977;7:15–7.
Jeong GM, et al. Finite-element investigation of the center of resistance of the maxillary dentition. Korean J Orthod. 2009;39(2):83–94.
Liang W, Rong Q, Xu B. Torque control of the maxillary incisors in lingual and labial orthodontics: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2009;135:316–22.
Sung SJ, et al. A comparative evaluation of different compensating curves in the lingual and labial techniques using 3D FEM. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;123:441–50.
Hong RK, Heo JM, Ha YK. Lever-arm and mini-implant system for anterior torque control during retraction in lingual orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod. 2005;75(1):129–41.
Choy K, et al. Effect of root and bone morphology on the stress distribution in the periodontal ligament. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000;117:98–105.
Wehrbein H, et al. The use of palatal implants for orthodontic anchorage. Design and clinical application of the orthosystem. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1996;7(4):410–6.
Park YC, et al. Lever-arm mechanics in lingual orthodontics. J Clin Orthod. 2000;34(10):601–5.
Kim KH, et al. Finite element analysis of effectiveness of lever arm in lingual sliding mechanics. Korean J Orthod. 2011;41(5):324–36.
Lee EH, et al. Three dimensional finite element analysis of continuous and segmented arches with use of orthodontic miniscrews. Korean J Orthod. 2011;41(4):237–54.
Lee KJ, et al. Computed tomographic analysis of tooth-bearing alveolar bone for orthodontic miniscrew placement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;135(4):486–94.
Fritz U, Ehmer A, Diedrich P. Clinical suitability of titanium microscrews for orthodontic anchorage-preliminary experiences. J Orofac Orthop. 2004;65(5):410–8.
Kuroda S, et al. Skeletal class III oligodontia patient treated with titanium screw anchorage and orthognathic surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;127(6):730–8.
Arnett GW, Milam SB, Gottesman L. Progressive mandibular retrusion–idiopathic condylar resorption. Part I. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;110(1):8–15.
Arnett GW, Milam SB, Gottesman L. Progressive mandibular retrusion-idiopathic condylar resorption. Part II. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;110(2):117–27.
Gkantidis N, et al. Treatment strategies for patients with hyperdivergent class II division 1 malocclusion: is vertical dimension affected? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;140:346–55.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lee, KJ., Park, YC. (2014). Application of TADs in Lingual Orthodontics: A Modified Segmented Arch Approach. In: Kim, K. (eds) Temporary Skeletal Anchorage Devices. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55052-2_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55052-2_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-55051-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-55052-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)