Advertisement

Conflict and Cooperation in the Development of US–China Relations in Science and Technology: Empirical Observations and Theoretical Implications

  • Richard P. SuttmeierEmail author
  • Denis Fred Simon
Chapter
Part of the Global Power Shift book series (GLOBAL)

Abstract

Science and technology have played important roles in the development of US-China relations since the late 1970s. The mechanism of scientific and technological cooperation between the two countries has been a useful tool of diplomacy and remains so today. However, the use of that tool has become more complicated over the past three decades in the face of changing political, economic and security environments, the impact of China’s growing capabilities in science and technology, a deepening of economic globalization and the growing role of global production networks, and the rise of global environmental and health issues. Ethnic identity as a basis for collaboration and the changing roles played by US-based ethnic Chinese scientists and engineers have played important roles. While the imperatives for building a long-term, sustainable cooperative science and technology relationship between the two countries are stronger than ever, the potential for conflict also has increased, pointing to the need for new approaches to governance in the bilateral relationship.

Keywords

US-China relations International scientific cooperation Science and foreign policy Science Technology and international relations 

References

  1. Atkinson, R. D. (2012). Enough is enough: Confronting Chinese innovation mercantilism. http://www.itif.org/publications/enough-enough-confronting-chinese-innovation-mercantilism. Accessed July 24, 2013.
  2. Cao, C., Suttmeier, R. P., & Simon, D. F. (2006). China’s 15-year science and technology plan. Physics Today, 59(12), 38–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. CERC. (2013). US-China clean energy research center. http://www.us-china-cerc.org/. Accessed July 24, 2013.
  4. Chang, I. (1995). Thread of the silkworm. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  5. Department of State. (2012). United States – China science and technology cooperation: Biennial report to the United States Congress. http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/197119.pdf. Accessed July 24, 2013.
  6. Flink, T., & Schreiterer, U. (2010). Science diplomacy at the intersection of S&T policies and foreign affairs: Toward a typology of national approaches. Science and Public Policy, 37(9), 665–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hannas, W. C., Mulvenon, J., & Puglisi, A. B. (2013). Chinese industrial espionage: Technology acquisition and military modernisation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Jin, B., Rousseau, R., Suttmeier, R. P., & Cao, C. (2007). The role of ethnic ties in international collaboration: The overseas Chinese phenomenon. In D. Torres-Salinas & H. F. Moed (Eds.), Proceedings of the ISSI 2007 (pp. 427–436). Madrid: CSIC.Google Scholar
  9. Larson, C., & Xin, H. (2013). Divided loyalties land scientists in hot water. Science, 340(6136), 1029–1031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. May, M. M., Johnston, A., Panofsky, W. K. H., DiCapua, M., & Franklin, L. (1999). The Cox Committee report: An assessment. Palo Alto, CA: Center for International Security and Cooperation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  11. McGregor, J. (2010). China’s drive for ‘indigenous innovation:’ A web of industrial policies. Washington, DC: US Chamber of Commerce. http://www.uschamber.com/reports/chinas-drive-indigenous-innovation-web-industrial-policies. Accessed July 24, 2013.
  12. Mervis, J. (2012). Wolf, OSTP settle China spat. Science INSIDER. http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2012/04/wolf-ostp-settle-china-spat.html. Accessed July 24, 2013.
  13. National Science Board. (2012). Science and engineering indicators, 2012. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation (NSB 12-01).Google Scholar
  14. OECD. (2008). OECD reviews of innovation policy: China. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.Google Scholar
  15. Schwaag Serger, S., & Breidne, M. (2007). China’s fifteen-year plan for science and technology: An assessment. Asia Policy, 4(1), 135–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Skolnikoff, E. B. (2002). Will science and technology undermine the international political system? International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 2, 29–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Smith, K. (1998). The role of scientists in normalizing US China relations: 1965–1979. In A. L. C. De Cerreno & A. Keynan (Eds.), Scientific cooperation, state conflict: The roles of scientists in mitigating international discord (pp. 114–136). New York, NY: New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  18. Springut, M., Schlaikjer, S., & Chen, D. (2011). China’s program for science and technology modernization: Implications for American competitiveness. Report prepared for the US-China Economic and Security Review Commission. http://origin.www.uscc.gov/research_archive?page=3. Accessed July 24, 2013.
  19. Suttmeier, R. P. (1998). Scientific cooperation and conflict management in US-China relations from 1978 to the present. In A. L. C. De Cerreno & A. Keynan (Eds.), Scientific cooperation, state conflict: The roles of scientists in mitigating international discord (pp. 137–164). New York, NY: New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  20. Suttmeier, R. P. (2008). State, self organization, and identity in the building of Sino US cooperation in science and technology. Asian Perspective, 32(1), 5–31.Google Scholar
  21. Suttmeier, R. P. (2010). From cold war science diplomacy to partnering in a networked world: 30 years of Sino-US relations in science and technology. Journal of Science and Technology Policy in China, 1(1), 18–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Suttmeier, R. P., & Cao, C. (1999). China faces the new industrial revolution: Research and innovation strategies for the 21st century. Asian Perspective, 23(3), 153–200.Google Scholar
  23. U.S. House of Representatives. (1999). Report of the select committee on US national security and military/commercial concerns with the People’s Republic of China. 105th Congress, 2nd Session, Report 105-851.Google Scholar
  24. White House. (2012). Fact sheet: U.S.-China science and technology cooperation highlights: 32 years of collaboration. http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/st-fact-sheet.pdf. Accessed July 24, 2013.
  25. Wilsdon, J., & Keeley, J. (2007). China: The next science superpower? http://www.demos.co.uk/publications/atlaschina. Accessed July 24, 2013.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of OregonEugeneUSA
  2. 2.Office of the PresidentArizona State UniversityTempeUSA

Personalised recommendations