Conflict and Cooperation in the Development of US–China Relations in Science and Technology: Empirical Observations and Theoretical Implications
Science and technology have played important roles in the development of US-China relations since the late 1970s. The mechanism of scientific and technological cooperation between the two countries has been a useful tool of diplomacy and remains so today. However, the use of that tool has become more complicated over the past three decades in the face of changing political, economic and security environments, the impact of China’s growing capabilities in science and technology, a deepening of economic globalization and the growing role of global production networks, and the rise of global environmental and health issues. Ethnic identity as a basis for collaboration and the changing roles played by US-based ethnic Chinese scientists and engineers have played important roles. While the imperatives for building a long-term, sustainable cooperative science and technology relationship between the two countries are stronger than ever, the potential for conflict also has increased, pointing to the need for new approaches to governance in the bilateral relationship.
KeywordsUS-China relations International scientific cooperation Science and foreign policy Science Technology and international relations
- Atkinson, R. D. (2012). Enough is enough: Confronting Chinese innovation mercantilism. http://www.itif.org/publications/enough-enough-confronting-chinese-innovation-mercantilism. Accessed July 24, 2013.
- CERC. (2013). US-China clean energy research center. http://www.us-china-cerc.org/. Accessed July 24, 2013.
- Chang, I. (1995). Thread of the silkworm. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Department of State. (2012). United States – China science and technology cooperation: Biennial report to the United States Congress. http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/197119.pdf. Accessed July 24, 2013.
- Hannas, W. C., Mulvenon, J., & Puglisi, A. B. (2013). Chinese industrial espionage: Technology acquisition and military modernisation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Jin, B., Rousseau, R., Suttmeier, R. P., & Cao, C. (2007). The role of ethnic ties in international collaboration: The overseas Chinese phenomenon. In D. Torres-Salinas & H. F. Moed (Eds.), Proceedings of the ISSI 2007 (pp. 427–436). Madrid: CSIC.Google Scholar
- May, M. M., Johnston, A., Panofsky, W. K. H., DiCapua, M., & Franklin, L. (1999). The Cox Committee report: An assessment. Palo Alto, CA: Center for International Security and Cooperation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
- McGregor, J. (2010). China’s drive for ‘indigenous innovation:’ A web of industrial policies. Washington, DC: US Chamber of Commerce. http://www.uschamber.com/reports/chinas-drive-indigenous-innovation-web-industrial-policies. Accessed July 24, 2013.
- Mervis, J. (2012). Wolf, OSTP settle China spat. Science INSIDER. http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2012/04/wolf-ostp-settle-china-spat.html. Accessed July 24, 2013.
- National Science Board. (2012). Science and engineering indicators, 2012. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation (NSB 12-01).Google Scholar
- OECD. (2008). OECD reviews of innovation policy: China. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.Google Scholar
- Smith, K. (1998). The role of scientists in normalizing US China relations: 1965–1979. In A. L. C. De Cerreno & A. Keynan (Eds.), Scientific cooperation, state conflict: The roles of scientists in mitigating international discord (pp. 114–136). New York, NY: New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
- Springut, M., Schlaikjer, S., & Chen, D. (2011). China’s program for science and technology modernization: Implications for American competitiveness. Report prepared for the US-China Economic and Security Review Commission. http://origin.www.uscc.gov/research_archive?page=3. Accessed July 24, 2013.
- Suttmeier, R. P. (1998). Scientific cooperation and conflict management in US-China relations from 1978 to the present. In A. L. C. De Cerreno & A. Keynan (Eds.), Scientific cooperation, state conflict: The roles of scientists in mitigating international discord (pp. 137–164). New York, NY: New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
- Suttmeier, R. P. (2008). State, self organization, and identity in the building of Sino US cooperation in science and technology. Asian Perspective, 32(1), 5–31.Google Scholar
- Suttmeier, R. P., & Cao, C. (1999). China faces the new industrial revolution: Research and innovation strategies for the 21st century. Asian Perspective, 23(3), 153–200.Google Scholar
- U.S. House of Representatives. (1999). Report of the select committee on US national security and military/commercial concerns with the People’s Republic of China. 105th Congress, 2nd Session, Report 105-851.Google Scholar
- White House. (2012). Fact sheet: U.S.-China science and technology cooperation highlights: 32 years of collaboration. http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/st-fact-sheet.pdf. Accessed July 24, 2013.
- Wilsdon, J., & Keeley, J. (2007). China: The next science superpower? http://www.demos.co.uk/publications/atlaschina. Accessed July 24, 2013.