Abstract
Intergovernmental collaboration in Big Science has been an important resource for European science since the 1950s, as a means to compete on global level. But interestingly, collaboration in (basic) science has traditionally been left outside of the political integration work of the European Community/Union, which has resulted in a cluttered policy field and a situation where European Big Science collaborations are built on ad hoc solutions rather than a coherent political framework and common regulatory standards. Despite this formal detachment, however, the genesis and development of collaborations, and their political realities once launched, often draw upon and reflect the ordinary (geo)political dynamics of Europe. This chapter reports on four historical and two contemporary cases of European collaboration in Big Science, from CERN in the 1950s to the currently planned European Spallation Source (ESS), all well-documented by previous studies, showing that while scientific and technical preconditions doubtlessly impact the fate of these Big Science installations, the logic and cycles of high-level politics in Europe always plays a role and can, in some cases, be said to have been decisive for the realization of a collaborative effort. Always balancing between national interest and the common good, European collaboration in Big Science is thus no different from the process of EC/EU integration, despite being formally detached therefrom. Using a historical perspective to make justice to the rather small collection of cases to study, the chapter covers a distinct instance of where science and technology is directly affected by international politics.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
A fear that would prove true: CERN II did in fact become the only center for experimental particle physics in Europe, with the exception of the German laboratory DESY in Hamburg (see below).
- 3.
- 4.
Another contributing factor for this might be that the ‘decision’ was made without a complete technical design and scientific case for the facility. These have reportedly been under development since 2009, and only after their finalization will it be possible to set a price tag for the future facility, for the prospective member countries to negotiate over.
References
Berggren, K.-F., & Hallonsten, O. (2012). Timeline of major events. In O. Hallonsten (Ed.), In pursuit of a promise: Perspectives on the political process to establish the European Spallation Source (ESS) in Lund, Sweden (pp. 21–30). Lund: Arkiv Förlag.
Blaauw, A. (1991). ESO’s early history: The European southern observatory from concept to reality. Garching: European Southern Observatory.
Gaubert, A., & Lebeau, A. (2009). Reforming European space governance. Space Policy, 25, 37–44.
Grande, E., & Peschke, A. (1999). Transnational cooperation and policy networks in European science policy-making. Research Policy, 28, 43–61.
Greenberg, D. S. (1999/1967). The politics of pure science (2nd ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Hallonsten, O. (2009). Small science on big machines: Politics and practices of synchrotron radiation laboratories. Ph.D. dissertation, Lund University
Hallonsten, O. (2012). Continuity and change in the politics of European scientific collaboration. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 8(3), 300–318.
Hallonsten, O. (2013). Introducing ‘facilitymetrics’: A first review and analysis of commonly used measures of scientific leadership among synchrotron radiation facilities worldwide. Scientometrics 96(2): 497–513.
Hallonsten, O., & Heinze, T. (2012). Institutional persistence through gradual adaptation: analysis of national laboratories in the USA and Germany. Science and Public Policy, 39(4), 450–463.
Herman, R. (1986). The European scientific community. Essex: Longman.
Hermann, A., Krige, J., Mersits, U., & Pestre, D. (1987). History of CERN. Volume I: Launching the European organization for nuclear research. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Hermann, A., Krige, J., Mersits, U., & Pestre, D. (1990). History of CERN. Volume II: Building and running the laboratory, 1954–1965. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Hoerber, T. C. (2009). The European space agency and the European Union: The next step on the road to the stars. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 5(3), 405–414.
Judt, T. (2005). Postwar: A history of Europe since 1945. London: Pimlico.
Kaiserfeld, T. (2013). ESS from neutron gap to global strategy: Plans for an international research facility after the cold war. In T. Kaiserfeld & T. O’Dell (Eds.), Legitimizing ESS: Big science as collaboration across boundaries. Lund: Nordic Academic Press.
Kirschstein, G. (2007). Kühle Begegnung zwischen Merkel und Putin. Die Welt, 16 October.
Krige, J. (2003). The politics of European scientific collaboration. In J. Krige & D. Pestre (Eds.), Companion to science in the twentieth century (pp. 897–918). London: Routledge.
Krige, J. (2006). American hegemony and the postwar reconstruction of science in Europe. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Krige, J. (2014). Technological collaboration and nuclear proliferation: A transnational approach. In: Mayer M, Carpes M, Knoblich R (Eds.), The global politics of science and technology (Vol. 1, Concepts from international relations and other disciplines). Heidelberg: Springer.
Leonard, D. (2010). Guide to the European union: The definitive guide to all aspects of the EU. London: Profile Books.
Middlemas, K. (1995). Orchestrating Europe: The informal politics of the European Union 1973–95. London: Fontana Press.
Papon, P. (2004). European scientific cooperation and research infrastructures: Past tendencies and future prospects. Minerva, 42, 61–76.
Pestre, D. (1990). Some characteristic features of CERN in the 1950s and 1960s. In A. Hermann et al. (Eds.), History of CERN. Volume II: Building and running the laboratory, 1954–1965. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Pestre, D. (1996). The difficult decision, taken in the 1960s, to construct a 3–400 GeV proton synchrotron in Europe. In J. Krige (Ed.), History of CERN (Vol. III, pp. 65–96). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Russian Corporation of Nanotechnologies. (2009). European XFEL project is set to start. Press release. Accessed February 14, 2013, from http://en.rusnano.com/press-centre/news/88183
Tindemans, P., & Clausen, K. (2003). ESS on hold: Europe urgently needs a strategy’. Neutron News, 14, 2.
Trischler, H., & Weinberger, H. (2005). Engineering Europe: Big technologies and military systems in the making of 20th century Europe. History and Technology, 21, 49–83.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hallonsten, O. (2014). The Politics of European Collaboration in Big Science. In: Mayer, M., Carpes, M., Knoblich, R. (eds) The Global Politics of Science and Technology - Vol. 2. Global Power Shift. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55010-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55010-2_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-55009-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-55010-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)