Advertisement

Chukudu Politics: The Relevance of Infrastructural Absences for Governmental Power and State Failure in the Post-Colonial world

  • Peer SchoutenEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Global Power Shift book series (GLOBAL)

Abstract

This chapter explores an analytical gap emerging at the intersection of political science and science and technology studies when their gaze is turned towards postcolonial Africa. Where political science has been bad at dealing with the importance of technological infrastructures for the constitution of governmental power, science and technology studies have hitherto been less attentive to situations in which such ‘infrastructures of rule’ are absent. This chapter aims at tentatively exploring this gap by pointing to the relevance of technological infrastructures in postcolonial Sub-Saharan Africa. It does so both through a cursory overview of literatures that might help articulate this problematique and by discussing the role of absences in technological infrastructures—such as roads, statistical tools, and government offices—in the historical unfolding of state formation of the Democratic Republic of Congo. The example of the chukudu—an improvised wooden transport utility that allows Congolese to go about despite decrepit infrastructures—is used to unpack the significance for infrastructural absences for social processes. Generalizing beyond the example of the chukudu, this chapter offers novel insights in the importance of technological asymmetries in global power-relations in postcolonial contexts.

Keywords

Infrastructure Postcolonial state formation State failure Governmental power Underdevelopment Sub-Sahara Africa 

References

  1. Aas, K. F., Gundhus, H. O., & Lomell, H. M. (Eds.). (2009). Technologies of in security: The surveillance of everyday life. New York, NY: Routledge-Cavendish.Google Scholar
  2. Acemoglu, D., Verdier, T., & Robinson, J. A. (2004). Kleptocracy and divide-and-rule: A model of personal rule. Journal of the European Economic Association, 2(2–3), 162–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. African Union. (2011). Exploiting natural resources for financing infrastructure development – policy options for Africa. Addis Ababa: African Union.Google Scholar
  4. Aretxaga, B. (2003). Maddening states. Annual Review of Anthropology, 32, 393–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Badibanga, A. (1985). L’urbanisation mimétique et l’extraversion des villes africaines. Tiers-Monde, 26(104), 849–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barnett, M. N. (2010). The international humanitarian order. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Barry, A. (2006). Technological zones. European Journal of Social Theory, 9(2), 239–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bayart, J.-F. (2000). Africa in the world: A history of extraversion. African Affairs, 99(395), 217–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bayart, J.-F. (2009). The state in Africa: The politics of the belly (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  11. Benton, L. (2006). Spatial histories of Empire. Itinerario, 30(3), 19–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boone, C. (2003). Political topographies of the African state: Territorial authority and institutional choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Booth, D., & Golooba-Mutebi, F. (2012). Developmental patrimonialism? The case of Rwanda. African Affairs, 111(444), 379–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bynens, E., & Taylor, G. (2012). Supporting infrastructure development in fragile and conflicted-affected states. Case study – DR Congo. London: DFID.Google Scholar
  15. Carroll, P. (2006). Science, culture, and modern state formation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chopra, J. (2002). Building state failure in East Timor. Development and Change, 33(5), 979–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Collier, S. J., & Lakoff, A. (2009, February). On vital systems security. International Affairs Working Paper 2009-01.Google Scholar
  18. Coquery-Vidrovitch, C. (1988). Vlles coloniales et histoire des Africains. Vingtième Siècle. Revue d’histoire, 20, 49–73.Google Scholar
  19. Daloz, J.-P. (2003). “Big Men” in Sub-Saharan Africa: How elites accumulate positions and resources. Comparative Sociology, 2, 271–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dant, T. (2006). Material civilization: Things and society. The British Journal of Sociology, 57(2), 289–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. de Laet, M., & Mol, A. (2000). The Zimbabwe bush pump: Mechanics of a fluid technology. Social Studies of Science, 30(2), 225–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Depelchin, J. (1992). From the Congo free state to Zaire: How Belgium privatized the economy: A history of Belgian stock companies in Congo-Zaïre from 1885 to 1974. Dakar: CODESRIA.Google Scholar
  23. Duffield, M. R. (2007). Development, security and unending war: Governing the world of peoples. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  24. Dunning, T. (2005). Resource dependence, economic performance, and political stability. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 49(4), 451–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Elden, S. (2007). Governmentality, calculation, territory. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 25(3), 562–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Englebert, P., & Tull, D. M. (2008). Postconflict reconstruction in Africa: Flawed ideas about failed states. International Security, 32(4), 106–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Enos, J. L. (1995). In pursuit of science and technology in sub-Saharan Africa: The impact of structural adjustment programmes. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Fairhead, J. (1992). Paths of authority: Roads, the state and the market in Eastern Zaire. The European Journal of Development Research, 4(2), 17–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Feenberg, A. (2005). Critical theory of technology: An overview. Tailoring Biotechnologies, 1(1), 47–64.Google Scholar
  30. Ferguson, J. (2005). Seeing like an oil company: Space, security, and global capital in neoliberal Africa. American Anthropologist, 107(3), 377–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Foster, V., & Benitez, D. A. (2011). The Democratic Republic of Congo’s infrastructure – a continental perspective. New York, NY: The World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Foster, V., & Briceño-Garmendia, C. (Eds.). (2010). Africa’s infrastructure – a time for transformation. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  33. Fowles, S. (2010). People without things. In M. Bille, F. Hastrup, & T. F. Sørensen (Eds.), The anthropology of absence: Materialisations of transcendence and loss (pp. 23–41). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Fritsch, S. (2011). Technology and global affairs. International Studies Perspectives, 12(1), 27–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Guldi, J. (2012). Roads to power: Britain invents the infrastructure state. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gupta, A. (2012). Red tape: Bureaucracy, structural violence, and poverty in India. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hannah, M. G. (2000). Governmentality and the mastery of territory in nineteenth-century America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Haraway, D. J. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Harrison, G. (2004). The World Bank and Africa: The construction of governance states. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Headrick, D. R. (1979). The tools of imperialism: Technology and the expansion of European colonial empires in the nineteenth century. The Journal of Modern History, 51(2), 231–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hecht, G. (2012). Being nuclear: Africans and the global uranium trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  42. Hendrie, B. (1997). Knowledge and power: A critique of an international relief operation. Disasters, 21(1), 57–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hochschild, A. (1998). King Leopold’s ghost. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  44. Hoeffler, A. (1999). Challenges of infrastructure rehabilitation and reconstruction in war-affected economies. Oxford: University of Oxford.Google Scholar
  45. Jackson, S. J., Batcheller, A. L., Edwards, P. N., Bowker, G. C., Cisler, S., & Star, S. L. (2008). Extending African knowledge infrastructures: Sharing, creating, maintaining. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  46. Jackson, R. H., & Rosberg, C. G. (1982a). Personal rule in Black Africa: Prince, autocrat, prophet, tyrant. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  47. Jackson, R. H., & Rosberg, C. G. (1982b). Why Africa’s weak states persist: The empirical and the juridical in statehood. World Politics, 35(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Jasanoff, S. (2004). States of knowledge: The co-production of science and social order. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kabamba, P. S. (2008). Trading on war: New forms of life in the debris of the state. Unpublished PhD thesis, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
  50. Kabamba, P. S. (2012). In and out of the state: Working the boundaries of power in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Open Anthropology Cooperative Press Working Paper Series (15).Google Scholar
  51. Latour, B. (1992). Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In W. E. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 225–258). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  52. Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Law, J., & Mol, A. (1995). Notes on materiality and sociality. The Sociological Review, 43, 274–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Leonard, D. K., Mushi, F. M., Samantar, M., & Vincent, J. (2011) Social contracts and security in Sub-Saharan African conflict states: The Democratic Republic of Congo, Sierra Leone and Somalia. Paper presented at the African Studies Association Conference.Google Scholar
  56. Mann, M. (1984). The autonomous power of the state: Its origins, mechanisms and results. European Journal of Sociology, 25(2), 185–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mann, M. (2008). Infrastructural power revisited. Studies in Comparative International Development, 43(3–4), 355–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Meni, M. (2000). L’importance du secteur informel en RDC. Bulletin de l’ANSD, 1, 21–40.Google Scholar
  59. Mitchell, T. (1988). Colonising Egypt. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  60. Mitchell, T. (2009). Carbon democracy. Economy and Society, 38(3), 399–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Mol, A. (1998). Ontological politics. A word and some questions. Sociological Review, 46(S), 74–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Moshonas, S. (2013). Looking beyond reform failure in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Review of African Political Economy, 40(135), 132–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Mosse, D., & Lewis, D. (Eds.). (2005). The aid effect: Giving and governing in international development. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  64. Müller, M. (2012). Opening the black box of the organization: Socio-material practices of geopolitical ordering. Political Geography, 31(6), 379–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Murdoch, J. (1997). Inhuman/nonhuman/human: Actor-network theory and the prospects for a nondualistic and symmetrical perspective on nature and society. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 15(6), 731–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Murdoch, J., & Ward, N. (1997). Governmentality and territoriality: The statistical manufacture of Britain’s ‘national farm’. Political Geography, 16(4), 307–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Ntoko, K. D. (2011). Roads and development under dictatorship: A study of the Democratic Republic of Congo. Unpublished PhD thesis, New School University, New York.Google Scholar
  68. Olwig, K. (2002). Landscape, place, and the state of progress. In R. D. Sack (Ed.), Progress: Geographical essays (pp. 22–60). Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Oyebisi, T. O. (2000). On reliability and maintenance management of electronic equipment in the tropics. Technovation, 20(9), 517–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Peemans, J.-P. (1975). The social and economic development of Zaire since independence: An historical outline. African Affairs, 74(295), 148–179.Google Scholar
  71. Pourtier, R. (1989). Les États et le contrôle territorial en Afrique centrale: principes et pratiques. Annales de Géographie, 98, 286–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Pourtier, R. (1991). L’inéluctable défi des transports. Politique Africaine, 41, 22–31.Google Scholar
  73. Pourtier, R. (1993). Désorganisation des transports et spirales du sous-développement au Zaïre. In C. Blanc-Pamard (Ed.), Dynamique des systèmes agraires: politiques agricoles et initiatives locales: adversaires ou partenaires (pp. 49–69). Paris: ORSTOM.Google Scholar
  74. Raeymaekers, T., Menkhaus, K., & Vlassenroot, K. (2008). State and non-state regulation in African protracted crises: Governance without government? Afrika Focus, 11(2), 7–21.Google Scholar
  75. Reed, E., & Miranda, M. (2007). Assessment of the mining sector and infrastructure development in the Congo Basin Region. Washington, DC: WWF.Google Scholar
  76. Reno, W. (2006). Congo: From state collapse to ‘absolutism’, to state failure. Third World Quarterly, 27(1), 43–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Rotberg, R. I. (2002). The new nature of nation‐state failure. The Washington Quarterly, 25(3), 83–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Rottenburg, R. (2009a). Far-fetched facts: A parable of development aid. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Rottenburg, R. (2009b). Social and public experiments and new figurations of science and politics in postcolonial Africa. Postcolonial Studies: Culture, Politics, Economy, 12(4), 423–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Schatzberg, M. G. (1980). The state and the economy: The “radicalization of the revolution” in Mobutu’s Zaire. Canadian Journal of African Studies/Revue Canadienne des Études Africaines, 14(2), 239–257.Google Scholar
  81. Schensul, D. (2008). From resources to power: The state and spatial change in post-apartheid Durban, South Africa. Studies in Comparative International Development, 43(3–4), 290–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Schouten, P. (2013). The materiality of state failure: Social contract theory, infrastructure and governmental power in Congo. Millennium – Journal of International Studies, 41(3), 553–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Schwartz, J., Hahn, S., & Bannon, I. (2004). The private sector’s role in the provision of infrastructure in post-conflict countries. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  84. Shaw, B. P. (1984). Force publique, force unique: The military in the Belgian Congo, 1914–1939. Unpublished PhD thesis, The University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
  85. Spencer, D. S. (1996). Infrastructure and technology constraints to agricultural development in the humid and subhumid tropics of Africa. African Development Review, 8(2), 68–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. The African Development Bank Group. (2010). Infrastructure Deficit and Opportunities in Africa. Economic Brief, 1(September), 1–15.Google Scholar
  87. Trefon, T. (2011). Congo masquerade. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  88. Ulimwengu, J., Funes, J., Headey, D., & You, L. (2009). Paving the way for development: The impact of road infrastructure on agricultural production and household wealth in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar
  89. UNDP. (2012). Governance for peace: Securing the social contract. New York, NY: UNDP.Google Scholar
  90. Wasinski, C. (2011). On making war possible. Security Dialogue, 42(1), 57–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. World Bank. (2008). Democratic Republic of Congo growth with governance in the mining sector. New York, NY: World Bank.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Global StudiesUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden

Personalised recommendations