Skip to main content

Petroleum Supply, Marine Transportation Technology, and the Emerging International Order of the Post World War One Period

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Global Politics of Science and Technology - Vol. 1

Part of the book series: Global Power Shift ((GLOBAL))

Abstract

At Versailles in 1919 President Wilson described three arenas of economic struggle, mediated by technology and geopolitics, that he saw developing between America and Britain as a new international order emerged: struggles over international transportation, petroleum, and international communication. The case of international transportation, almost all of it maritime in the 1920s, is intimately connected with that of the problem many observers saw with an insecure and possibly faltering global supply of petroleum. America dominated the early period of global petroleum supply, especially after the strike at Spindletop in Texas in 1901, but Spindletop was faltering by 1920. Even before World War One broke out German and British War Aims thus began to focus on the likely oil reserves of the Middle East that America could not control, Germany via the mineral rights the company was granted along the line of the Berlin to Baghdad Railway concession of 1903 and Britain via the Sykes-Picot-Sazanoff agreement of 1916, the latter resulting in the eventual creation of Iraq. In the run-up to the war oil-firing of steam turbine engine warships was seen as a technology that would substantially increase the fighting capacity of naval vessels through, amongst other things, radically easier refueling and a substantial reduction in stokehold crew size. Operators of merchant vessels followed a similar line of reasoning for a new generation of steam turbine powered ships coming to dominate the Atlantic shuttle by virtue of their speed. The war, however, proved a huge technology forcer in the area of diesel engines, which even in their early form were ideally suited to powering merchant ships, offering substantial savings in fuel and/or labor costs over steamships. Commentators in the 1920s were very clear on the relationship between the petroleum and marine transportation struggles, arguing that whoever controlled the right mix of marine transportation technology, in particular that of the merchant marine, and petroleum supply would control the emerging post-war international order. Of the major powers neither Britain nor Germany did particularly well in shifting their merchant marines to diesel power, America did very poorly. America’s strength was in continuing to control the global oil supply.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ardagh, C. (1886). The Red Sea petroleum deposits. Proceedings of the Royal Geographical Society, 8(8), 502–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogert, J. J. (1912, September 26). The new oil engines. The New York Times, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, S. (1991). American hegemony and world oil: The industry, the state system and the world economy. State College, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cadman, J. (1934). Middle east geography in relation to petroleum. The Geographical Journal, 84(3), 201–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C. F. (1911). The advent of the motor ship. American Review of Reviews, 44(5), 591–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, L. B. (1942). The marine power plant. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • de la Tramerye, P. L.’. E. (1924). The world-struggle for oil. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deffeyes, K. S. (2006). Beyond oil: The view from Hubbert’s peak. New York: Hill & Wang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delaisi, F. (1922). Oil: Its influence on politics. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denny, R. (1928). We fight for oil. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denny, R. (1930). America conquers Britain. A record of economic war. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earle, E. M. (1923). Turkey, the great powers, and the Bagdad railway: A study in imperialism. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earle, E. M. (1924). The Turkish Petroleum Company—A Study in oleaginous diplomacy. Political Science Quarterly, 39(2), 265–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgar, E. M. (1919, September 21). Sees oil control passing to Britain. The New York Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanning, L. M. (1947). American oil operations abroad. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, L. (1926). Oil imperialism: The international struggle for petroleum. New York: International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, E. P. (1991). The Iraq Petroleum Company, standard oil of California, and the contest for Eastern Arabia, 1930-1933. International History Review, 13(3), 441–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, E. P. (1993). Business diplomacy: Walter Teagle, Jersey Standard, and the Anglo-French pipeline conflict in the Middle East, 1930-1931. Business History Review, 67(2), 207–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, E. P. (1994). France’s Middle East ambitions, the Sykes-Picot negotiations, and the oil-fields of Mosul, 1915-1918. Journal of Modern History, 66(4), 697–725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flis, J. E., & Price, R. C. (Eds.). (1990). Permian basin oil and gas fields: Innovative ideas in exploration and development (West Texas Geological Society Symposium, publication No. 90 -87). Midland: West Texas Geological Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, E. W. (1971). History in geographic perspective: The other France. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromkin, D. (1989). A peace to end all peace. The fall of the Ottoman Empire and the creation of the Modern Middle East. New York: Avon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, J. S. (1988). Long cycles. Prosperity and war in the modern age. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanighen, F. C. (1934). The secret war. New York: John Day.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, A. C. (1926). Motorships. An investigation into the character of mercantile vessels powered by internal combustion engines. New York: Van Nostrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henning, G. R., & Trace, K. (1975). Britain and the motorship: A case of the delayed adoption of new technology. Journal of Economic History, 35(2), 353–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, J. D. (1908). Oil fuel and the empire. London: Bradbury, Agnew & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herald, F. A. (1957). Occurrence of oil and gas in West Texas. Austin, TX: University of Texas Bureau of Economic Geology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hugill, P. J. (1993). World trade since 1431: Geography, technology, and capitalism. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hugill, P. J. (2003). Technology, its innovation and diffusion as the motor of capitalism. Comparative Technology Transfer and Society, 1(1), 89–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hugill, P. J. (2005). Trading states, territorial states, and technology: Mackinder’s unexplored contribution to the discourse on state types. In B. W. Blouet (Ed.), Global geostrategy: Mackinder and the defence of the West (pp. 108–125). London: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hugill, P. J. (2009a). The American challenge to British Hegemony, 1861-1947. Geographical Review, 99(2), 403–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hugill, P. J. (2009b). Transitions in hegemony: A theory based on state type and technology. In W. Thompson (Ed.), Systemic transitions: Past, present, and future (pp. 33–54). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hugill, P. J., & Bachmann, V. (2005). The route to the techno-industrial world-economy and the transfer of German organic chemistry to America before, during, and immediately after World War One. Comparative Technology Transfer and Society, 3(2), 159–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hugill, P. J., & Dickson, D. Bruce (Eds.). (1988). The transfer and transformation of ideas and material culture. College Station, TX: Texas A & M University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, R. (1953). Making friends is our business, 100 years of Anheuser-Busch (written in collaboration with P. J. Orthwein). St. Louis: Anheuser-Busch, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landahn, D. (1925). Krupp’s big battleship diesel engine. Journal of the American Society for Naval Engineers, 37(1), 168–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucke, C. E. (1921). Internal combustion engines in marine service, parts I & II. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 192(1), 11–45 and 192(2), 203–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackinder, H. J. (1904). The geographical pivot of history. The Geographical Journal, 23, 421–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackinder, H. J. (1919). Democratic ideals and reality: A study in the politics of reconstruction. New York: Henry Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacMillan, M. (2001). Paris 1919. Six months that changed the World. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcosson, I. F. (1924). The Black Golconda. The romance of petroleum. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mejcher, H. (2007). The struggle for a New Middle East in the 20th century. studies in imperial design and national politics. Berlin: Lit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modelski, G. (1978). The long cycle of global politics and the nation-state. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 20, 214–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modelski, G., & Thompson, W. R. (1988). Seapower in global politics, 1494–1993. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, A. (1926). The oil war. New York: Harcourt, Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schramm, J. W. (2010). Out of steam: Dieselization and American railroads, 1920–1960. Bethlehem, PA: Lehigh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smil, V. (2010). Prime movers of globalization: The history and impact of diesel engines and gas turbines. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. C. (1938). A short history of marine engineering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, C. C. E. (1886). The Herat Valley and the Persian Border, from the Hari-rud to Sistan. Proceedings of the Royal Geographical Society, 8(3), 137–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stivers, W. (1982). Supremacy and oil: Iraq, Turkey, and the Anglo-American World Order, 1918-1930. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Texas Railroad Commission. http://www.rrc.state.tx.us/about/history/chronological/chronhistory01.php. Accessed January 16, 2013.

  • Texas State Handbook. (2013). Entry on Permain Basin. http://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/online/articles/ryp02. Accessed January 16, 2013.

  • Tilly, C. (1990). Coercion, capital, and European States, AD 990–1990. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuma, E. H. (1987). Technology transfer and economic development: Lessons in history. Journal of Developing Areas, 21, 403–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Commerce (USDC). (1960). Historical statistics of the United States: Colonial times to 1957. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venn, F. (1986). Oil diplomacy in the twentieth century. New York: St. Martin’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, I. (1974). The modern world-system (Capitalist agriculture and the origins of the European World-Economy in the sixteenth century, Vol. 1). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkler, M. F. (2003). Introduction to marine petroleum fuels. In G. E. Totten, S. R. Vestbrook, & R. H. Shah (Eds.), Fuels and lubricants handbook: Technology, properties, performance, and testing (pp. 145–168). West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yergin, D. (1991). The prize: The epic quest for oil, money, and power. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zischka, A. (1933). La Guerre secrete pour le Pétrole. Paris: Payot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zischka, A. (1934). Der Kampf um die Weltmacht Öl. Leipzig: Wilhelm Goldmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zischka, A. (1939). Ölkrieg: Wandlung der Weltmacht. Leipzig: Wilhelm Goldmann.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter J. Hugill .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hugill, P.J. (2014). Petroleum Supply, Marine Transportation Technology, and the Emerging International Order of the Post World War One Period. In: Mayer, M., Carpes, M., Knoblich, R. (eds) The Global Politics of Science and Technology - Vol. 1. Global Power Shift. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55007-2_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics