Skip to main content

Research on Risk Assessment of Ship Repair Based on Case-Based Reasoning

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 1134 Accesses

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 278))

Abstract

As it is difficult to describe the mechanism of ship repair risk, common methods are less credible for its assessment. By analyzing ship repair risk, this paper identifies the causes and consequences of risk, and utilizes frame-based representation to construct the case representation for ship repair risk. In addition, similarity functions are developed for enumerated attributes, numeric attributes, and fuzzy attributes, so as to perform reasoning of repair risk from the approach of K-Nearest Neighbor. Case analysis presents that the application of case-based reasoning in ship repair risk assessment is easy to understand and extend.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Qingming Z (2006) Safety risk analysis and control of ship-repair. China Ship Repair 19(3):5–8 (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Xinguang T, Zhiming Q, Miyi D (2008) Progress risk analysis of naval gun development based on multiple risk probability models. ACTA Armamentarii 29(5):521–525 (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ge Zhihao X, Haojun LL et al (2007) Risk probability assessment method for complex system. J Beijing Univ Aeronaut Astronaut 33(9):1025–1028 (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jian C, Zhongmin L, Shuchun T et al (2008) Risk assessment of purchasing weapon system based on improved risk matrix method. J Syst Eng Electron 30(10):1918–1923 (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ping S, Weizhen M, Yuanfu T (2005) Application of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method in project risk management. J Lanzhou Jiaotong Univ (Nat Sci Ed) 24(6):53–55 (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hong Z, Yaju L, Tao S (2008) Project risk management based on Bayesian network. J Shenyang Univ Technol 1(3):239–243 (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zhe X, Jinjin W, Ligang Y (2008) Quantitative appraisement model of technical risk for weapon system based on GERT simulation technique. J Syst Simul 20(7):1655–1660, 1664 (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Watoson I (1999) Case-based reasoning is a methodology not a technology. Knowl-Based Syst 12(5,6):303–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nakhaeizadeh G (1994) Learning prediction of time series. A theoretical and empirical comparison of CBR with some other approaches. In: Topics in Case-Based Reasoning. Springer, Berlin, pp 65–76

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhi-Cheng Chen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Yao, L., Chen, ZC., Yang, JJ. (2014). Research on Risk Assessment of Ship Repair Based on Case-Based Reasoning. In: Wen, Z., Li, T. (eds) Knowledge Engineering and Management. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 278. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54930-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54930-4_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-54929-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-54930-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics