Advertisement

Anatomy of the Peripheral Nerve System

  • Götz Penkert
Chapter

Abstract

The common macroscopic anatomy of all peripheral nerves and their relationship to surrounding structures can usually be derived from the anatomical atlas. It is important to know which variations can exist: several variations of the brachial plexus at trunk level, rare variations of the level where the musculocutaneous nerve separates from the median nerve, relatively frequent ramification variants between the median and ulnar nerves at the lower arm, which are important during the diagnostic process and, of course, for the correct preoperative decision making. Of less importance are anatomical variants at the lower limb: different ramification levels between tibial and peroneal nerves, respectively the medial and lateral branches of the tibial nerve at the ankle. It is also worth mentioning that the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve and its relationship to the iliac crest may vary. The microscopic peripheral nerve anatomy is characterized by a changing cross-sectional pattern from proximal to distal insofar as the primary mono-fascicular structure ends in a multi-fascicular nerve pattern in the periphery. Although surgical release of focal entrapment remains in the paraneurium, knowledge of microscopically different anatomical aspects within the nerve becomes more and more important so that modern imaging methods can be interpretated correctly.

Keywords

Median Nerve Ulnar Nerve Peroneal Nerve Nerve Trunk Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Uysal IL, Seker M, Karabulut AK, Büyükmuncu M, Ziylan T. Brachial plexus variations in the human foetuses. Neurosurgery. 2003;53:676–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Saced M, Rufal AA. Median and musculocutaneous nerves: variant formation and distribution. Clin Anat. 2003;16:453–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kline DG, Hudson AR. Nerve injuries. Philadelphia: WB. Saunders Comp; 1995. p. 194–7.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ghent WR. Further study on meralgia paraesthetica. Can Med Ass J. 1961;85:871–5.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Millesi H, Terzis JK. Problems of terminology in peripheral nerve surgery. Microsurgery. 1983;4:51–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Millesi H, Hausner T, Schmidhammer R, Trattnig S, Tschabitscher M. Anatomical structures to provide passive motility of peripheral nerve trunks and fascicles. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2007;100:133–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sunderland S. Nerve injuries and their repair. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1991. p. 31–40.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Götz Penkert
    • 1
  1. 1.Neurosurgical DepartmentFriederiken-HospitalHannoverGermany

Personalised recommendations