Advertisement

Ill-Posedness Analysis of Ambiguity Resolution Using BDS-2 and Its Fusion with GPS

  • Wang GaoEmail author
  • Chengfa Gao
  • Shuguo Pan
  • Shengli Wang
  • Xiaofei Shi
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 304)

Abstract

Different from GPS or GLONASS, BDS (BeiDou Navigation Satellite System) consists of not only MEO satellites but GEO and IGSO satellites, both of which are high-orbit satellites. Now BDS has finished its second step of the all three steps, and can provide regional navigation and positioning service. BDS-2 now mainly consists of 5 GEO, 5 IGSO and 4 MEO satellites. For most places of China, the GEO satellites always gather in a south part of the visible satellites sky plot. The IGSO satellites are also often seen in the south part. These lead into poor satellite geometry. Besides this, the running angular velocities of GEO and IGSO satellites are much smaller compared with MEO satellites. This results in that the geometric relationship between the satellite and the station changes slowly, so that there exists strong correlation between the observation equations from adjacent epochs. The poor satellite geometry and the small velocities make the ambiguity resolution (AR) of BDS-2 be a more serious ill-posed problem. In this paper the ill-posedness of the AR of BDS-2 was analyzed. And on this basis, some different combinations of GEO, IGSO and MEO satellites of BDS-2 were used in the AR experiments to reveal the characteristic of ill-posedness. AR experiment of GPS was also carried out at the same time for comparison with BDS-2. At last, the fusion AR experiment of BDS and GPS was done. From these experiments we concluded that BDS-2 AR which mainly relied on high-orbit satellites is a serious ill-posedness problem, so it takes much more time than GPS. The fusion with GPS will make the problem change much better.

Keywords

BDS-2 Ambiguity resolution Ill-posed Fusion with GPS 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the Key Projects in the National Science and Technology Pillar Program during the Twelfth Five-year Plan Period (No. 2012BAJ23B01). The authors are very grateful to the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and suggestions.

References

  1. 1.
    Yang Y, Li J, Xu J et al (2011) Contribution of the compass satellite navigation system to global PNT users. Chin Sci Bull 56(26):2813–2819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yang Y (2010) Progress, contribution and challenges of Compass/Beidou satellite navigation system. Acta Geodaetica Cartogr Sin 39(1):1–6Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ran C (2012) Development of the BeiDou navigation satellite system. Global navigation satellite systems. In :Report of the joint workshop of the national academy of engineering and the chinese academy of engineering, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhao Q, Guo J, Li M, et al (2013) Initial results of precise orbit and clock determination for COMPASS navigation satellite system[J]. J Geodesy 87(5): 475–486Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhou S, Cao Y, Zhou J et al (2012) Positioning accuracy assessment for the 4GEO/5IGSO/2MEO constellation of compass. Sci China Phys Mech Astron 55(12):2290–2299CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gao W, Gao C, Pan S et al (2013) The Analysis of ill posedness in GNSS high-precision differential positioning. In: Proceedings of the China satellite navigation conference (CSNC 2013). Springer, Berlin, pp 311–321Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    He H, Li J, Yang Y, et al (2013) Performance assessment of single-and dual-frequency BeiDou/GPS single-epoch kinematic positioning. GPS Solutions http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10291-013-0339-3
  8. 8.
    Guo Q, Hu Z (2007) The effect of ill-condition equations of GPS rapid positioning on the GPS baseline solution. Sci Survey Mapp 32(2):42–43Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Teunissen P (2007) Influence of ambiguity precision on the success rate of GNSS integer ambiguity bootstrapping. J Geodesy 81(5):351–358CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Teunissen P (1995) The least-squares ambiguity decorrelation adjustment: a method for fast GPS integer ambiguity estimation. J Geodesy 70(1–2):65–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Teunissen P, De J, Tiberius C (1997) Performance of the LAMBDA method for fast GPS ambiguity resolution. Navigation 44(3):373–383Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang S, Wang Q, Gao W et al (2013) Analysis and valuation of ill-condition in baseline solution of GNSS multi-system. J Southeast Univ (Natural Science Edition) 43(4):753–757Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lu X, Feng Z, Liu J (2007) Analysis theory on ill-conditioned system with application in surveying. Surveying and Mapping Press, Beijing, pp 7–15Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Li B, Shen Y, Feng Y (2010) Fast GNSS ambiguity resolution as an ill-posed problem. J Geodesy 84(11):683–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Deng C, Tang W, Liu J et al (2013) Reliable single-epoch ambiguity resolution for short baselines using combined GPS/BeiDou system. GPS Solutions, http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10291-013-0337-5

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wang Gao
    • 1
    Email author
  • Chengfa Gao
    • 1
  • Shuguo Pan
    • 2
  • Shengli Wang
    • 2
  • Xiaofei Shi
    • 1
  1. 1.School of TransportationSoutheast UniversityNanjingChina
  2. 2.School of Instrument Science and EngineeringSoutheast UniversityNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations