Advertisement

Converging Universes and Media Niches in Serial Narratives: An Approach Through Information Architecture

  • V. InnocentiEmail author
  • G. Pescatore
  • L. Rosati
Chapter
Part of the Media Business and Innovation book series (MEDIA)

Abstract

Our paper deals with models of convergence pertaining to audiovisual media production, with specific reference to serial narratives. The peculiar features of this kind of audiovisual products, such as expansion and persistence over space and time, allow for a privileged point of view on convergence phenomena. The paper adopts an interdisciplinary approach, using conceptual tools from several disciplinary fields, namely film and media studies, as well as media economics and information architecture. Our ultimate purpose is to offer a cross-disciplinary perspective that can profit from the combination of all these fields together. In order to do so, we apply information architecture and cross-channel user experience principles to the media field, adopting an overall ecosystemic perspective, and focusing on the bias between local experience (the single product) and global design (the whole ecosystem) and vice-versa. Furthermore, we focus on three different production strategies—which we have named respectively derivation, cross-media and ecosystem—mainly concentrating on the latter, since contemporary TV series often show an ecosystemic narrative and productive structure. Our purpose is to highlight the misalignments between project and practice, as well as possible forms of conflict and adverse reactions to planning. We account for divergence models that lead to the building of “media niches”, which often remain external or peripheral to the circulation and delivery of media contents—for instance, the case of fans using and re-appropriating of media content linked to specific gender practices and identities.

Keywords

Narrative Structure Comic Book Information Architecture Star Trek Convergence Phenomenon 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ambient Media Association (AMEA). Accessed February 16, 2013, from http://www.ambientmediaassociation.org
  2. Appelgren, E. (2004). Convergence and divergence in media: Different perspectives. In: J. Engelen, S. Costa, & A. C. Moreira (Eds.), Building Digital Bridges: Linking Cultures, Commerce and Science. Proceedings of the 8th ICCC/IFIP International Conference on Electronic Publishing, Brasília 23–26 June.Google Scholar
  3. Bates, M. (2002). Toward an integrated model of information seeking and searching. Keynote Address, Fourth International Conference on Information Needs, Seeking and Use in Different Contexts. Lisbon. Accessed February 10, 2013, from http://www.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/bates/articles/info_SeekSearch-i-030329.html
  4. Bolin, G. (2007). Media technologies, transmedia storytelling and commodification. In T. Storsul & D. Stuedahl (Eds.), Ambivalence towards convergence. Digitalization and media change. Göteborgs: Nordicom.Google Scholar
  5. Bolter, J. D., & Grusin, R. (2000). Remediation. Understanding new media. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  6. Casetti, F. (2011). Cinema lost and found: Trajectories of relocation. Screening the Past 32 (Screen Attachments: New practices of viewing moving images). Accessed February 9, 2013, from http://www.screeningthepast.com/2011/11/cinema-lost-and-found-trajectories-of-relocation/
  7. Curtin, M., & Shattuc, J. (2009). The American television industry. London: British Film Institute.Google Scholar
  8. Giovanazzi, L., & Mascaro, L. (2009). Architettura informativa ed ecosistemi (Information architecture and ecosystems). Speech at 3rd Italian Information Architecture Summit (Forlì, Italy). Accessed February 9, 2013, from http://www.sketchin.ch/it/blog/conferenze-workshop/iasummit-ecosistemi-e-adattabilita.html
  9. Grasso, A., & Scaglioni, M. (2009). Arredo di serie I mondi possibili della serialità televisiva Americana. Milano: V&P.Google Scholar
  10. Gwenllian-Jones, S., & Pearson, R. E. (2004). Cult television. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hammond, M., & Mazdon, L. (2005). The contemporary television series. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hesmondhalgh, D. (2007). The cultural industries. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Innocenti, V. (2007). Buffy the Vampire Slayer e la serializzazione della serie. In B. Maio (Ed.), Buffy the Vampire Slayer. Legittimare la Cacciatrice. Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
  14. Innocenti, V., & Pescatore, G. (2008). Le nuove forme della serialità televisiva. Storia, linguaggio, temi (The New Shapes of TV Series. History, Language, Topics). Bologna: Archetipolibri.Google Scholar
  15. Innocenti V., & Pescatore G. (2012). Information architecture in contemporary television series. Journal of Information Architecture, 4(1–2). Accessed September 2, 2013, from http://journalofia.org/volume4/issue2/05-pescatore/
  16. Jancovic, M., & Lyons, J. (Eds.). (2013). Quality popular television. London: British Film Institute.Google Scholar
  17. Jenkins, H. (2003). Transmedia storytelling. Technology Review. January 15. Accessed February 10, 2013, from http://www.technologyreview.com/news/401760/transmedia-storytelling/
  18. Jenkins, H. (2006a). Convergence culture. Where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Jenkins, H. (2006b). Fans, bloggers, and gamers. Exploring participatory culture. NewYork: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Jenkins, H. (2013). Textual poachers: Television fans and participatory culture. Updated Twentieth Anniversary Edition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Jenkins, H., Ford, S., & Green, J. (2013). Spreadable media: Creating value and meaning in a networked culture. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Johnsons, D. (2009). The fictional institution of lost: World building, reality and the economic possibilities of narrative divergence. In R. Pearson (Ed.), Reading lost. New York: Tauris.Google Scholar
  23. Leverette, M., Lott, B., & Buckley, C. (Eds.). (2008). It’s not TV. Watching HBO in post-television era. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Lugmayr, A., Stockleben, B., Risse, T., & Kaario, J. (2012). Editorial: Re-thinking the future of semantic ambient media. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 58, 289–292. doi: 10.1007/s11042-011-0899-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lugmayr, A., Zou, Y., Stockleben, B., Lindfors, K., & Melakoski, C. (2012). Categorization of ambient media projects on their business models, innovativeness, and characteristics—Evaluation of Nokia Ubimedia MindTrek award projects of 2010. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 66(1), 33–57. doi: 10.1007/s11042-012-1143-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Marchionini, G. (2012). Bridges, linchpins and membranes: From I to we. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. December/January. Accessed February 10, 2013, from http://www.asis.org/Bulletin/Dec-11/DecJan12_Marchionini.html
  27. Mattessi, P. (2003). Buffy and the serialization of the series. Metro Magazine, 137, 76–77.Google Scholar
  28. McCabe, J., & Akass, K. (Eds.). (2011). Quality Tv. Contemporary American television and beyond. London: I. B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  29. Mittell, J. (2009). Television and American culture. NewYork: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Mittell, J. (2012). Complex TV: The Poetics of Contemporary Television Storytelling. Pre-publication edition. MediaCommons Press.Google Scholar
  31. Montola, M., Stenros, J., & Waern, A. (2009). Pervasive games: Theory and design. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
  32. Newman, M. Z. (2006). From beats to arcs: Toward a poetics of television narrative. The Velvet Light Trap, 58, 16–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Norman, D. (2009). Systems thinking: A product is more than the product. Interactions, 16(5). Accessed February 4, 2013, from http://www.jnd.org/dn.mss/systems_thinking_a_.html Google Scholar
  34. Pearson, R. (Ed.). (2009). Reading lost: perspectives on a hit television show. London: I. B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  35. Resmini, A., & Rosati, L. (2009). Information Architecture for Ubiquitous Ecologies. MEDES’09 The International Conference on Management of Emergent Digital EcoSystems, Lyon, October 27–30. Accessed February 4, 2013, fromhttp://andrearesmini.com/blog/ia-for-ubiquitous-ecologies
  36. Resmini, A., & Rosati, L. (2011). Pervasive information architecture. Designing cross-channel user experiences. Burlington: Morgan Kaufman.Google Scholar
  37. Retail Touchpoints. (2011). Shopper preferences shift as customers expect improvements in retailers’ cross-channel capabilities. Accessed February 4, 2013, fromhttp://www.retailtouchpoints.com/resource-center/51-white-papers/1028-shopper-preferences-shift-as-customer-expect-improvements-in-retailers-cross-channel-capabilities
  38. Rosen, R. (1999). Essays on life itself. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Rosenfeld, L., & Morville, P. (1998). Information architecture for the world wide web. Brooklyn, NY: O’Reilly Media.Google Scholar
  40. Rosenfeld, L., & Morville, P. (2006). Information architecture for the world wide web (3rd ed.). Brooklyn, NY: O’Reilly Media.Google Scholar
  41. Scaglioni, M. (2006). TV di culto. La serialità televisiva americana e il suo fandom (Cult TV. The American Television Series and its Fandom). Milano: V&PGoogle Scholar
  42. Sepinwall, A. (2013). The revolution was televised: The cops, crooks, slingers, and slayers who changed TV drama forever. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
  43. Spiegel, L. (2004). Introduction. In L. Spiegel & J. Olsson (Eds.), Television after TV essays on a medium in transition. Durham, NC: Dukes University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sterling, B. (2005). Shaping things. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  45. Thompson, R. J. (1997). Television’s second golden age. From hill street blues to ER. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Thompson, K. (2003). Storytelling in film and television. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Thompson, R. J. (2007). Preface. In J. McCabe & K. Akass (Eds.), Quality TV. Contemporary American television and beyond. London and New York: I. B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  48. Tungate, M. (2004). Media monoliths. How great media brands thrive and survive. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  49. Wikipedia Contributors. (2013). Reboot (fiction). Wikipedia (English). Accessed February 9, 2013, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reboot_(fiction
  50. Zolli, A., & Healy, A. M. (2013). Resilience. The science of why things bounce back. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of BolognaBolognaItaly
  2. 2.University for Foreigners of PerugiaPerugiaItaly

Personalised recommendations