The Effects of Information to Gain Employee Involvement and Achieve Organizational Convergence in a Media Setting

  • Stavros GeorgiadesEmail author
Part of the Media Business and Innovation book series (MEDIA)


This is an inductive study in a media organization to understand how managers think they can work to achieve employee involvement and thus organizational convergence via the provision of information to employees, highlighting the importance of both the characteristics of the information and the necessary assistance to ensure employees appreciate and use the information to influence organizational affairs.


Convergence management and leadership Organizational and human resource development 


  1. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive view. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  2. Black, S., & Margulies, N. (1989). An ideological perspective on participation: A case for integration. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 2(1), 13–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Block, P. (1987). The empowered manager. San Francisco: Jossey–Bass.Google Scholar
  4. Clayton, J., & Gregory, W. J. (2000). Reflections on critical systems thinking and the management of change in rule-bound systems. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 13, 140–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cobb, A. T., Folger, R., & Wooten, K. (1995). The role justice plays in organizational change. Public Administration Quarterly, 19(2), 135–152.Google Scholar
  6. Coch, L., & French, J. R. P., Jr. (1948). Overcoming resistance to change. Human Relations, 1, 512–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Conger, J. A. (1986). Empowering leadership, Working Paper. Montreal: McGill University.Google Scholar
  8. Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 13, 471–482.Google Scholar
  9. Delaney, J. T., & Sockell, D. (1990). Employee involvement programs, unionization and organizational flexibility. Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings, 1990, (pp 264–269).Google Scholar
  10. Detert, R. J., & Burris, R. E. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open? Academy of Management Journal, 50, 869–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Edwards, P., & Collinson, M. (2002). Empowerment and managerial labor strategies: Pragmatism regained. Work and Occupations, 29(3), 272–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gill, J. (1996). Communication—Is it really that simple? An analysis of a communication exercise in a case study. Personnel Review, 25, 23–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hales, C. (2000). Management and empowerment programmes. Work, Employment and Society, 14(3), 501–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jackson-Cox, J., McQueeney, J., & Thirkell, J. E. M. (1987). Strategies issues and events in industrial relations: disclosure of information in context. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  15. Ketokivi, M., & Castaner, X. (2004). Strategic planning as an integrating device. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49, 337–365.Google Scholar
  16. Klein, S. M. (1996). A management communication strategy for change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 9, 32–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lewin, K. (1943). Psychology and the process of group living. Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 113–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lewis, K. L., Schmisseur, M. A., Stephens, K. K., & Weir, K. E. (2006). Advice on communicating during organizational change. Journal of Business Communication, 43, 113–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lundberg, C. C. (1990). Towards mapping the communication targets of organisational change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 3(3), 6–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Maynard, M. T., Mathieu, J. E., Gilson, L. L., O’Boyle, E. H., Jr., & Cigularov, K. P. (2012). Drivers and outcomes of team psychological empowerment: A meta-analytic review and model test. Organizational Psychology Review, 3(2), 101–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McHugh, M. (1997). The stress factor: Another item for the change management agenda? Journal of Organizational Change Management, 10, 345–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Morgan, D. E., & Zeffane, R. (2003). Employee involvement, organizational change and trust in management. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 14, 55–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Neubert, M. J., & Cady, S. H. (2001). Program commitment: A multi-study longitudinal field investigation of its impact and antecedents. Personnel Psychology, 54, 421–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nord, W. R., Rosenblatt, Z., & Rogers, K. (1993). Toward a political framework for flexible management of decline. Organization Science, 4, 76–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Purdy, D. E. (1993). Accounting controls, change and the perceptions of managers: A longitudinal study of ward units in a teaching hospital. Financial Accountability and Management, 9, 45–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rusaw, C. A. (2000). Uncovering training resistance—A critical theory perspective. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 13, 249–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schwochau, S., & Delaney, J. (1997). Employee participation and assessments of support for organizational policy changes. Journal of Labor Research, 18, 379–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tangirala, S., & Ramanujam, R. (2008). Exploring nonlinearity in employee voice: The effect of personal control and organizational identification. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 1189–1203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tesluk, P. E., Vance, R. J., & Mathieu, J. E. (1999). Examining employee involvement in the context of participative work environments. Group and Organization Management, 24, 271–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tierney, P. (1999). Work relations as a precursor to a psychological climate for change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 12(2), 120–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Vroom, V. H. (1973). A new look at managerial decision making. Organizational Dynamics, 1(4), 66–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wall, T., & Lisheron, J. A. (1977). Worker participation. London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  33. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research—Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  34. Zhang, X., & Bartol, M. K. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 107–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Economic Sciences and AdministrationFrederick UniversityLimassolCyprus

Personalised recommendations