Skip to main content

Media Business Drivers and Concepts 2020: The Case of David and Goliath Revisited

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Media Convergence Handbook - Vol. 2

Part of the book series: Media Business and Innovation ((MEDIA))

  • 1522 Accesses

Abstract

Whereas diversified global media ‘Goliaths’ enjoy economies of scale and smaller, agile, risk-taking media ‘Davids’ flourish in niche markets, prospects for mid-sized mass media companies are bleak. We argue that such companies suffer from a conservative approach to convergence. They lack radical innovation that offers new meanings to humans, supported by radically new technology. More daring approaches to convergence and especially divergence may unlock vast amounts of underutilised business potential in media businesses. Furthermore we argue that the significant potential of business ecosystem thinking is systematically ignored. Once these challenges and opportunities are tackled, the probability for creating more promising business models will increase significantly. Aiming for a year 2020 forecast, we crowd sourced divergent views on media convergence. Our data consists of 42 individual scenarios authored by 38 media professionals and academics. Using thematic analysis, we synthesized in detail the convergence and divergence of media business drivers in nine dimensions. We suggest that three dimensions, gamification, social values and media companies’ leadership and management, are the key enablers for combining radically new meanings with radically new technology. Innovations based on these enablers may unlock completely new business opportunities. Drawing from and contributing to theories of organisational behaviour, we encourage mass media company leaders to diverge and focus on business models based on a system approach. Concluding, we show why business model development needs thorough understanding of both future divergent convergence and the business system of the company.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Tameling and Broersma (2013) provide an illustrative example about “de-convergence” (ibid. 20–21) in a Dutch newsroom. After vertical convergence in 2006 (integrated news production for multiple platforms within one brand) the company changed in 2011 to horizontal convergence (news production in separate newsrooms per platform, all serving multiple brands).

  2. 2.

    As part of the Tivit Next Media programme—http://www.nextmedia.fi

References

  • Anderson, C. (2009). Free: The future of a radical price. New York: Hyperion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banathy, B. H. (1998). Evolution guided by design: A systems perspective. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 15(3), 161–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackler, F. (1995). Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations: An overview and interpretation. Organization Studies, 16(6), 1021–1046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bontis, N. (1998). Intellectual capital: An exploratory study that develops measures and models. Management Decision, 36(2), 63–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casadesus-Masanell, R., & Ricart, J. E. (2011). How to design a winning business model. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 100–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • EIFFEL. (2009). Think tank on future internet 2009 report. www.fp7-eiffel.eu

  • Fritscher, B., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Supporting business model modelling: A compromise between creativity and constraints. In P. Palanque, J. Vanderdonckt, & P. Wild (Eds.), England D (pp. 28–43). Springer Berlin Heidelberg: Task models and diagrams for user interface design.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giesecke, R., & Immonen, S. (2010). Media sector business drivers in 2020. Paper presented at the Third NEM Summit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giesecke, R., Immonen, S., Sirkkunen, E., Grenman, K., Bäck, A., Helle, M., et al. (2010). Media Scenarios 2020 Version 2. Helsinki: Tivit Next Media Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hipp, C. (1999). Knowledge-intensive business services in the new mode of knowledge production. AI & Society, 13(1), 88–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Itami, H., & Nishino, K. (2010). Killing two birds with one stone. Profit for now and learning for the future. Long Range Planning, 43, 364–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthyssens, P., & Vandenbempt, K. (2003). Cognition-in-context: Reorienting research in business market strategy. The Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 18, 595–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Missikoff, M., Drissi, S., Giesecke, R., Grilo, A., Li, M.-S., Mehandjiev, N., et al. (Eds.). (2010). Future internet enterprise systems (FinES) cluster. Research roadmap. Final report. Brussels: European Commission, European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., & Clark, T. (2010). Business model generation : A handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remenyi, D., Williams, B., Money, A., & Swartz, E. (1998). Doing research in business and management: An introduction to process and method. London: Sage Publications Ltd.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smart, J. M., Cascio, J., & Pappendorf, J. (2007). Metaverse roadmap overview. Retrieved January, 2013, from http://www.metaverseroadmap.org/overview/

  • Tameling, K., & Broersma, M. (2013). De-converging the newsroom: Strategies for newsroom change and their influence on journalism practice. The International Communication Gazette, 75(1), 19–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verganti, R. (2009). Design-driven innovation: Changing the rules of competition by radically innovating what things mean. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitman, J. R. (2009). Measuring social values in philanthropic foundations. Non-profit Man-agement and Leadership, 19(3), 305–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, H., Fu, Y., & Lugmayr, A. (2012). The development of ambient TV in 2016. Proceeding of the 16th International Academic MindTrek Conference, pp. 233–236.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments. We cordially thank all the future scenarios contributors and the Vision 2020 team, especially Man-Sze Li, Esa Sirkkunen and Kai Kuikkaniemi. This work was partially supported by the Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation TEKES as part of the Tivit Next Media programme. A preliminary version was presented at the Third NEM Summit, 2010.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stina Giesecke .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Giesecke, S., Giesecke, R. (2016). Media Business Drivers and Concepts 2020: The Case of David and Goliath Revisited. In: Lugmayr, A., Dal Zotto, C. (eds) Media Convergence Handbook - Vol. 2. Media Business and Innovation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54487-3_20

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics