User Perspectives on Media Convergence: Results from Quantitative and Qualitative Studies

  • Alexandre FleuryEmail author
Part of the Media Business and Innovation book series (MEDIA)


This chapter investigates the user perspective on new media, and especially on how the convergence between television and mobile technologies is experienced in highly connected societies. It relies on three user studies aiming at exploring current and future practices with televisions and mobile phones in Denmark and Japan, two countries with high technology penetration rates. First, an online survey conducted in the spring of 2012 explored mobile phone and television usage separately as well as jointly, as in mobile television and in a second screen setup. In addition to this quantitative study, four panel discussions took place in Denmark, during which media consumers of all ages were introduced to and discussed issues specific to second screens. They manipulated a number of high-fidelity prototypes and debated on issues of separation of content and control as well as on prompting for interaction. Finally, the personal relationship between TV and mobile phone owners and their devices was explored in Denmark and Japan through participant-generated drawings. These drawings revealed how media is used at home, what mobile devices their owner carries around, and personal memories related to television and mobile phones. Based on these studies, the proposed chapter identifies a number of trends concerning the near future of converging media solutions as seen by their future users.


Mobile Phone Mobile Device Mobile Technology Primary Screen Technological Convergence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The author would like to thank the CAMMP project and the Danish National Advanced Technology Foundation for supporting the work presented in this chapter, as well as all the participants who took part in the user studies reported.


  1. Baron, N. S. (2009). Three words about mobile phones: Findings from Sweden, the US, Italy, Japan, and Korea. The good, the bad, and the challenging: The user and the future of information and communication technologies. COST Action, 298, 273–282.Google Scholar
  2. Berthold, A., Schmidt, J., & Kirchknopf, R. (2010). The ARD and ZDF Mediathek portals. EBU Technical Review (2010 Q1). Retrieved January 12, 2012, from http://bit. ly/f5HsdVGoogle Scholar
  3. Basapur, S., et al. (2011). Field trial of a dual device user experience for iTV (pp. 127–136). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
  4. Brasel, S. A., & Gips, J. (2011). Media multitasking behavior: Concurrent television and computer usage. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 14(9), 527–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bruns, A. (2007). Produsage. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity & Cognition (C&C ’07) (pp. 99–106). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
  6. Brush, A., & Inkpen, K. (2007). Yours, mine and ours? Sharing and use of technology in domestic environments. In J. Krumm, G. Abowd, A. Seneviratne, & T. Strang (Eds.), UbiComp 2007: Ubiquitous computing (pp. 109–126). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Caldwell, J. T. (2008). Production culture: Industrial reflexivity and critical practice in film and television. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Campbell, S. W., & Russo, T. C. (2003). The social construction of mobile telephony: An application of the social influence model to perceptions and uses of mobile phones within personal communication networks. Communication Monographs, 70(4), 317–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Castells, M. (2007). Communication. Power and Counter-power in the Network Society. International Journal of Communication, 1, 238–266.Google Scholar
  10. Cesar, P., Bulterman, D. C., & Jansen, A. J. (2008). Usages of the secondary screen in an interactive television environment: Control, enrich, share, and transfer television content. In Changing television environments (pp. 168–177). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  11. Cesar, P., Chorianopoulos, K., & Jensen, J. F. (2008). Social television and user interaction. Computers in Entertainment, 6(1), 4:1–4:10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cesar, P., Knoche, H., & Bulterman, D. C. A. (2010). From one to many boxes: Mobile devices as primary and secondary screens. In A. Marcus, R. Sala, & A. C. Roibás (Eds.), Mobile TV: Customizing content and experience (pp. 327–348). London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chuang, M. C., Chang, C. C., & Hsu, S. H. (2001). Perceptual factors underlying user preferences toward product form of mobile phones. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 27(4), 247–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cohen, L., Duberley, J., & Musson, G. (2009). Work-Life Balance? Journal of Management Inquiry, 18(3), 229–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Creeber, G. (2011). I’s not TV, it’s online drama: The return of the intimate screen. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 14(6), 591–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Curran, J., Iyengar, S., Brink Lund, A., & Salovaara-Moring, I. (2009). Media system, public knowledge and democracy. European Journal of Communication, 24(1), 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Deuze, M. (2006). Participation, remediation, bricolage: Considering principal components of a digital culture. The Information Society, 22(2), 63–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ekman, P. (1989). The argument and evidence about universals in facial expressions of emotion. Handbook of Social Psychophysiology, 58, 342–353.Google Scholar
  19. Ekman, P. (1992). Are there basic emotions? Psychological Review, 99(3), 550–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. (1971). Constants across cultures in the face and emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 17(2), 124–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ekman, P., Friesen, W. V., & Ellsworth, P. (1972). Emotion in the human face: Guidelines for research and an integration of findings. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  22. Elfenbein, H., & Ambady, N. (2002). On the universality and cultural specificity of emotion recognition: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 128(2), 203–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fallahkhair, S., Pemberton, L,. & Masthoff, J. (2004). A dual device scenario for informal language learning: interactive television meets the mobile phone, pp. 16–20Google Scholar
  24. Fleury, A. (2012). Drawing and acting as user experience research tools. In Proceedings of the 10th Asia Pacific Conference on Computer Human Interaction (APCHI ’12) (pp. 269–278). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
  25. Hall, E. (1984). The dance of life: The other dimension of time. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  26. Heller, M. (2008). Global and European information society. In P. Ludes (Ed.), Convergence and fragmentation: Media technology and the information society (pp. 29–46). Bristol: Intellect.Google Scholar
  27. Hess, J., Ley, B., Ogonowski, C., Wan, L., & Wulf, V. (2011). Jumping between devices and services: towards an integrated concept for social tv. In Proceddings of the 9th International Interactive Conference on Interactive Television (pp. 11–20). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
  28. Hofkirchner, W. (2009). “Community”—Where to from Here? From “networked individualism” towards “community networks”. Journal of Sociocybernetics, 7(2), 62–71.Google Scholar
  29. Ito, M. (2005). Mobile phones, Japanese youth, and the re-placement of social contact. In Mobile communications (pp. 131–148). London: Springer.Google Scholar
  30. Jenkins, H. (2001). Convergence? I diverge. Technology Review, 104, 93.Google Scholar
  31. Jenkins, H., 2006. Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide (Rev éd.). New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
  32. Jenkins, H., et al. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  33. Knoche, H., & Sasse, M. A. (2007). Getting the big picture on small screens: Quality of experience in Mobile TV. In G. Lekakos, K. Chorianopoulos, & G. Doukidis (Eds.), Interactive digital television: Technologies and applications (pp. 242–260). Hershey, PA : IGI Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kruitbosch, G., & Nack, F. (2008). Broadcast yourself on YouTube: Really? (pp. 7–10). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
  35. Larsen, A. L., & Svenningsen, U. H. (2011). Many Danes surf the internet while watching TV. In: The development of media 2011. DR Medieforskning, pp. 26–31.Google Scholar
  36. Lindquist, J. D., Knieling, J., & Kaufman-Scarborough, C. (2001). Polychronicity and consumer behavior outcomes among Japanese and US students: A study of response to culture in a US university setting. In Proceedings of the tenth biennial world marketing congress (Vol. 10, No. 4.4, p. 4).Google Scholar
  37. Lüders, M. (2007). Converging forms of communication? In T. Storsul & D. Stuedahl (Eds.), Ambivalence towards convergence: Digitalization and media change (pp. 179–198). Göteborg: Nordicom.Google Scholar
  38. Ludes, P. (Ed.). (2008). Convergence and fragmentation: Media technology and the information society. Bristol: Intellect.Google Scholar
  39. Lund, A. B. (2007). Media markets in Scandinavia: Political economy aspects of convergence and divergence. Nordicom Review, 28, 121–134.Google Scholar
  40. Miller, C. (2012). Mobile TV—What’s on? Juniper Research.Google Scholar
  41. Miyata, K., Boase, J., Wellman, B., & Ikeda, K. (2004). The mobile-izing Japanese: Connecting to the internet by PC and webphone in Yamanashi. In M. Ito, M. Matsuda, & D. Okabe (Eds.), Personal, portable, pedestrian—Mobile phones in Japanese life (pp. 143–164). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  42. Miyata, K., Wellman, B., & Boase, J. (2005). The wired and wireless Japanese: Webphones, PCs and social networks. In R. S. Ling & P. E. Pedersen (Eds.), Mobile communications: Re-negotiation of the social sphere (pp. 427–449). London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nielsen, J. (1994). Usability engineering. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
  44. O’Hara, K., Mitchell, A. S., & Vorbau, A. (2007). Consuming video on mobile devices (pp. 857–866). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
  45. Oksman, V., Ollikainen, V., Noppari, E., Herrero, C., & Tammela, A. (2008). ‘Podracing’: Experimenting with mobile TV content consumption and delivery methods. Multimedia Systems, 14(2), 105–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pavlik, J. V., & McIntosh, S. (2010). Converging media: A new introduction to mass communication (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Redman, T., Snape, E., & Ashurst, C. (2009). Location, location, location: Does place of work really matter? British Journal of Management, 20, S171–S181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Repo, P., Hyvönen, K., Pantzar, M., & Timonen, P. (2004). Users inventing ways to enjoy new mobile services—The case of watching mobile videos (p. 40096.3). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.Google Scholar
  49. Robertson, S., Wharton, C., Ashworth, C., & Franzke, M. (1996). Dual device user interface design: PDAs and interactive television (pp. 79–86). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
  50. Sauter, D. A., Eisner, F., Ekman, P., & Scott, S. K. (2010). Cross-cultural recognition of basic emotions through nonverbal emotional vocalizations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, January, 107(6), 2408–2412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Storsul, T., & Stuedahl, D. (Eds.). (2007). Ambivalence towards convergence: Digitalization and media change. Nordicom: Göteborg.Google Scholar
  52. Suteja, J., & Tedjohartoko, S. (2011). The influence of mobile phone’s forms in the user perception. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 75, 473–476.Google Scholar
  53. Thompson, M. (2010). Putting quality first-The BBC and public space. BBC. Retrieved January 12, 2011, from http://bbc. in/wTwWj6Google Scholar
  54. Thunø, L. (2012). Medieudviklingen 2011. DR Medieforsknings. Retrieved February 13, 2012, from Scholar
  55. Tokan, F. (2011). Media as multitasking: An exploratory study on capturing audiences’ media multitasking and multiple media use behaviours. Helsinki, Finland: Aalto University School of Economics.Google Scholar
  56. Tsekleves, E., Whitham, R., Kondo, K., & Hill, A. (2009). Bringing the television experience to other media in the home: An ethnographic study (pp. 201–210). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
  57. Tsekleves, E., Whitham, R., Kondo, K., & Hill, A. (2011). Investigating media use and the television user experience in the home. Entertainment Computing, 2(3), 151–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Uricchio, W. (2009). The future of a medium once known as television. The YouTube Reader (pp. 24–39).Google Scholar
  59. Vermeer, F. (2011). What’s on the Tube today?—On the ontology of television and YouTube. Netherlands: Utrecht University, Faculty of Humanities.Google Scholar
  60. Wapshott, R., & Mallett, O. (2012). The spatial implications of homeworking: A Lefebvrian approach to the rewards and challenges of home-based work. Organization, 19(1), 63–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wellman, B. (2002). Little boxes, glocalization, and networked individualism. Digital cities II: Computational and sociological approaches, pp. 337–343.Google Scholar
  62. Wellman, B., et al. (2003). The social affordances of the Internet for networked individualism. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 8(3).Google Scholar
  63. Westlund, O. (2010). New(s) functions for the mobile: A cross-cultural study. New Media & Society, 12(1), 91–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Aalborg University – Section for Multimedia and Signal ProcessingAalborgDenmark

Personalised recommendations