Skip to main content

Influence of Convergent Media on the Perception of Information Credibility

  • Chapter
Media Convergence Handbook - Vol. 1

Part of the book series: Media Business and Innovation ((MEDIA))

  • 2889 Accesses

Abstract

In this research, the information design is explored in the context of technological changes, with the aim of determining does the application of converged media content affects on the evaluation of information credibility. Research hypothesis was: by using different levels of media convergence in the digital space, the assessment of the media messages can be changed. The empirical study was conducted using the web pages that were comprised of substantially same information but presented using different levels of media convergence. The research showed the impact of visual presentation technology on the process of decoding messages through two measured elements—number of eye fixations on the content and duration of content usage. Obtained eyetracking measurements gave objective data on the use of media and the data obtained by a questionnaire gave a subjective assessment of the information credibility expressed through four dimensions: objectivity, reliability, competence and stringency. Results obtained by using the system for measuring eye movements showed that there were statistically significant differences in the use of media content according to the used level of media convergence. Visual design of the site influenced on the subjective assessment of the credibility of the content. Results of measurements of fixation number and duration of visits to media content confirmed the hypothesis that the mode of graphic presentation of information affects on the perception of content. Questionnaire has confirmed that usage of convergent media content changes the subjective perception of information credibility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abras, C., Maloney-Krichmar, D., & Preece, J. (2004). User-centered design. In W. Bainbridge (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human-computer interaction. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthes, R. (1977). Image music text. London: Fontana Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagin, A. J., & Metzger, M. J. (2000). Perceptions of internet information credibility. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(3), 515–540. doi:10.1177/107769900007700304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fogg, B. J., & Tseng, H. (1999). The elements of computer credibility. In Proceedings of the CHI 99 Conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 80–87). New York: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/302979.303001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaziano, C., & McGrath, K. (1986). Measuring the concept of credibility. Journalism Quarterly, 63(3), 451–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmqvist, K., Holsanova, J., Barthelson, M., & Lundqvist, D. (2003). Reading or scanning? A study of newspaper and net paper reading. In J. Hyönä, R. Radach, & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind’s eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (Section 5: Eye movements in media applications and communication, pp. 657–703). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H. (2007). Reconsidering digital immigrants… Accessed June 26, 2012, from http://henryjenkins.org/2007/12/reconsidering_digital_immigran.html

  • Johnson, T. J., & Kaye, B. K. (1998). Cruising is believing? Comparing Internet and traditional sources on media credibility measures. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 75(2), 325–340. doi:10.1177/107769909807500208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, T. J., & Kaye, B. K. (2002). Webelievability: A path model examining how convenience and reliance predict online credibility. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 79(3), 619–642. doi:10.1177/107769900207900306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurtić, N. (2007). Konceptualizacija istraživanja. In S. Malovic (Ed.), Vjerodostojnost novina (pp. 39–65). Zagreb: ICEJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidwell, W., Holden, K., & Butler, J. (2003). Universal principles of design. Gloucester, MA: Rockport Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Z., & Huang, X. (2005). Evaluating the credibility of scholarly information on the Web: A cross cultural study. International Information & Library Review, 37(2), 99–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, P. (1988). Defining and measuring credibility of newspapers: Developing an index. Journalism Quarterly, 65(3), 567–574. doi:10.1177/107769908806500301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morkes, J., & Nielsen, J. (1997). Concise, scannable and objective: How to write for the Web. Accessed June 26, 2012, from www.useit.com/papers/webwriting/writing.html

  • Müller, M. D. (2008). Visual competence: A new paradigm for studying visuals in the social sciences? Visual Studies, 23(2), 101–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newhagen, J., & Mass, C. (1989). Differential criteria for evaluating credibility of newspaper and TV news. Journalism Quarterly, 66(2), 277–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. A., & Draper, S. W. (1986). User centered system design: New perspectives on human-computer interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olaisen, J. (1990). Information quality factors and the cognitive authority of electronic information. In I. Wormell (Ed.), Information quality: Definitions and dimensions (pp. 91–121). Los Angeles: Taylor Graham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieh, S. Y. (2002). Judgment of information quality and cognitive authority in the Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(2), 145–161. doi:10.1002/asi.10017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, S., Rohn, J. A., & Humburg, J. (2000). A toolkit for strategic usability: Results from workshops, panels, and surveys. In T. Turner, G. Szwillus, M. Czerwinski, F. Peterno, & S. Pemberton (Eds.), Proceedings of the ACM CHI 2000 human factors in computing systems conference (pp. 337–344). Hague: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wathen, C. N., & Burkell, J. (2002). Believe it or not: Factors influencing credibility on the Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(2), 134–144. doi:10.1002/asi.10016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Z., & Ji, Q. (2004). Eye and gaze tracking for interactive graphic design. Machine Vision and Applications, 15, 139–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daria Mustić .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mustić, D., Plenković, M. (2016). Influence of Convergent Media on the Perception of Information Credibility. In: Lugmayr, A., Dal Zotto, C. (eds) Media Convergence Handbook - Vol. 1. Media Business and Innovation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54484-2_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics