Skip to main content

Riemann-Finsler Geometry for Diffusion Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Mathematics and Visualization ((MATHVISUAL))

Abstract

We consider Riemann-Finsler geometry as a potentially powerful mathematical framework in the context of diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging. We explain its basic features in heuristic terms, but also provide mathematical details that are essential for practical applications, such as tractography and voxel-based classification. We stipulate a connection between the (dual) Finsler function and signal attenuation observed in the MRI scanner, which directly generalizes Stejskal-Tanner’s solution of the Bloch-Torrey equations and the diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) model inspired by this. The proposed model can therefore be regarded as an extension of DTI. Technically, reconstruction of the (dual) Finsler function from diffusion weighted measurements is a fairly straightforward generalization of the DTI case. The extension of the Riemann differential geometric paradigm for DTI analysis is, however, nontrivial.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We neglect, but do not a priori exclude, a mild dependence of H(x, q) on τ .

  2. 2.

    We use Einstein’s summation convention throughout, i.e. explicit summation symbols, such as \(\sum _{i,j=1}^{3}\) on the r.h.s. of Eq. (3), are suppressed for pairs of identical upper and lower indices.

  3. 3.

    A function f(z) is called homogeneous of degree r if it satisfies f(λ z) = λ r f(z) for all λ > 0. According to Euler’s theorem such a function obeys the first order partial differential equation \(z^{i}\partial f(z)/\partial z^{i} = rf(z)\).

  4. 4.

    Please note that the Riemannian paradigm does not stipulate that geodesics are biologically meaningful tracts, cf. Astola et al. [10] for a connectivity criterion that could be used for a deterministic or probabilistic labelling of biologically plausible neural tracts among all possible geodesic tracts. Indeed, in a geodesically complete space any two points can be connected by at least one geodesic.

  5. 5.

    Instead of the norm condition, Eq. (10), one sometimes requires \(F(x,\lambda \dot{x}) =\lambda F(x,\dot{x})\). What matters in diffusion processes without convection is orientation, not signed direction, so it is natural to require mirror symmetry \(\dot{x}\longleftrightarrow -\dot{ x}\) a priori.

  6. 6.

    It will be seen later, cf. Eqs. (45)–(47), that it is more natural to think of g ij as a metric in q-space, as opposed to the \(\dot{x}\)-space metric g ij .

  7. 7.

    Caveat: In [43] Rund defines these symbols as \(\varGamma _{\mathit{jk}}^{{\ast}i}(x,\dot{x})\).

  8. 8.

    Caveat: In [43] Rund defines these symbols as \(\varGamma _{\mathit{ijk}}^{{\ast}}(x,\dot{x})\).

  9. 9.

    Caveat: In [42] Bao et al. write \(G^{i}(x,\dot{x}) =\gamma _{ \mathit{jk}}^{i}(x,\dot{x})\dot{x}^{j}\dot{x}^{k}\).

  10. 10.

    One sometimes reserves the terms Lagrangian and Hamiltonian for the squared Finsler and dual Finsler function. The associated “energy” functionals are not parametrization invariant.

References

  1. Hagmann, P., Jonasson, L., Maeder, P., Thiran, J.P., Wedeen, V.J., Meuli, R.: Understanding diffusion MR imaging techniques: from scalar diffusion-weighted imaging to diffusion tensor imaging and beyond. RadioGraphics 26, S205 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Basser, P.J., Mattiello, J., Le Bihan, D.: Estimation of the effective self-diffusion tensor from the NMR spin echo. J. Magn. Reson. 103, 247 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Basser, P.J., Mattiello, J., Le Bihan, D.: MR diffusion tensor spectroscopy and imaging. Biophys. J. 66(1), 259 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Basser, P.J., Mattiello, J., Le Bihan, D.: Diffusion tensor MR imaging of the human brain. Radiology 201(3), 637 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Basser, P.J., Pierpaoli, C.: Microstructural and physiological features of tissues elucidated by quantitative-diffusion-tensor MRI. J. Magn. Reson. Ser. B 111(3), 209 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Basser, P.J.: Relationships between diffusion tensor and q-space MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 47(2), 392 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Le Bihan, D., Mangin, J.F., Poupon, C., Clark, C.A., Pappata, S., Molko, N., Chabriat, H.: Diffusion tensor imaging: concepts and applications. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 13, 534 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Moseley, M., Cohen, Y., Kucharczyk, J., Mintorovitch, J., Asgari, H.S., Wendland, M.F., Tsuruda, J., Norman, D.: Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of anisotropic water diffusion in cat central nervous system. Radiology 176(2), 439 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Arsigny, V., Fillard, P., Pennec, X., Ayache, N.: Log-Euclidean metrics for fast and simple calculus on diffusion tensors. Magn. Reson. Med. 56(2), 411 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Astola, L., Florack, L., ter Haar Romeny, B.: Measures for pathway analysis in brain white matter using diffusion tensor images. In: Karssemeijer, N., Lelieveldt, B. (eds.) Proceedings of the Twentieth International Conference on Information Processing in Medical Imaging–IPMI 2007, Kerkrade. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4584, pp. 642–649. Springer, Berlin (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Astola, L., Florack, L.: Sticky vector fields and other geometric measures on diffusion tensor images. In: Proceedings of the 9th IEEE Computer Society Workshop on Mathematical Methods in Biomedical Image Analysis, held in conjuction with the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Anchorage, 23–28 June 2008. IEEE Computer Society

    Google Scholar 

  12. Astola, L., Fuster, A., Florack, L.: A Riemannian scalar measure for diffusion tensor images. Pattern Recognit. 44(9), 1885 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2010.09.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Deriche, R., Calder, J., Descoteaux, M.: Optimal real-time Q-ball imaging using regularized Kalman filtering with incremental orientation sets. Med. Image Anal. 13(4), 564 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fillard, P., Pennec, X., Arsigny, V., Ayache, N.: Clinical DT-MRI estimation, smoothing, and fiber tracking with log-Euclidean metrics. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 26(11) (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Florack, L.M.J., Astola, L.J.: A multi-resolution framework for diffusion tensor images. In: Aja Fernández, S., de Luis Garcia, R. (eds.) CVPR Workshop on Tensors in Image Processing and Computer Vision, Anchorage, 24–26 June 2008. IEEE (2008). Digital proceedings

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lenglet, C., Deriche, R., Faugeras, O.: Inferring white matter geometry from diffusion tensor MRI: application to connectivity mapping. In: Pajdla, T., Matas, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the Eighth European Conference on Computer Vision, Prague, May 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3021–3024, pp. 127–140. Springer, Berlin (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lenglet, C., Rousson, M., Deriche, R., Faugeras, O.: Statistics on the manifold of multivariate normal distributions: theory and application to diffusion tensor MRI processing. J. Math. Imaging Vis. 25(3), 423 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Lenglet, C., Prados, E., Pons, J.P.: Brain connectivity mapping using Riemannian geometry, control theory and PDEs. SIAM J. Imaging Sci. 2(2), 285 (2009)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Pennec, X., Fillard, P., Ayache, N.: A Riemannian framework for tensor computing. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 66(1), 41 (2006)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Prados, E., Soatto, S., Lenglet, C., Pons, J.P., Wotawa, N., Deriche, R., Faugeras, O.: Control theory and fast marching techniques for brain connectivity mapping. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, New York, June 2006, vol. 1, pp. 1076–1083. IEEE Computer Society (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Florack, L., Balmashnova, E.: Two canonical representations for regularized high angular resolution diffusion imaging. In: Alexander, D., Gee, J., Whitaker, R. (eds.) MICCAI Workshop on Computational Diffusion MRI, New York, 10 Sept 2008, pp. 85–96 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Florack, L., Balmashnova, E., Astola, L., Brunenberg, E.: A new tensorial framework for single-shell high angular resolution diffusion imaging. J. Math. Imaging Vis. 3(38), 171 (2010). Published online: doi:10.1007/s10851-010-0217-3

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jensen, J.H., Helpern, J.A., Ramani, A., Lu, H., Kaczynski, K.: Diffusional kurtosis imaging: the quantification of non-Gaussian water diffusion by means of magnetic resonance imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 53(6), 1432 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jian, B., Vemuri, B.C., Özarslan, E., Carney, P.R., Mareci, T.H.: A novel tensor distribution model for the diffusion-weighted MR signal. NeuroImage 37, 164 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu, C., Bammer, R., Acar, B., Moseley, M.E.: Characterizing non-Gaussian diffusion by using generalized diffusion tensors. Magn. Reson. Med. 51(5), 924 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Özarslan, E., Mareci, T.H.: Generalized diffusion tensor imaging and analytical relationships between diffusion tensor imaging and high angular resolution imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 50(5), 955 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Özarslan, E., Shepherd, T.M., Vemuri, B.C., Blackband, S.J., Mareci, T.H.: Resolution of complex tissue microarchitecture using the diffusion orientation transform (DOT). NeuroImage 31, 1086 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Descoteaux, M., Angelino, E., Fitzgibbons, S., Deriche, R.: Apparent diffusion coefficients from high angular resolution diffusion imaging: estimation and applications. Magn. Reson. Med. 56(2), 395 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Descoteaux, M., Angelino, E., Fitzgibbons, S., Deriche, R.: Regularized, fast, and robust analytical Q-ball imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 58(3), 497 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Florack, L.M.J.: Codomain scale space and regularization for high angular resolution diffusion imaging. In: Aja Fernández, S., de Luis Garcia, R. (eds.) CVPR Workshop on Tensors in Image Processing and Computer Vision, Anchorage, 24–26 June 2008. IEEE (2008). Digital proceedings

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hess, C.P., Mukherjee, P., Tan, E.T., Xu, D., Vigneron, D.B.: Q-ball reconstruction of multimodal fiber orientations using the spherical harmonic basis. Magn. Reson. Med. 56, 104 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Tuch, D.S.: Q-ball imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 52, 1358 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Duits, R., Franken, E.M.: Left invariant parabolic evolution equations on SE(2) and contour enhancement via invertible orientation scores, part I: linear left-invariant diffusion equations on SE(2). Q. Appl. Math. 68(2), 255 (2010)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Duits, R., Franken, E.M.: Left invariant parabolic evolution equations on SE(2) and contour enhancement via invertible orientation scores, part II: nonlinear left-invariant diffusion equations on invertible orientation scores. Q. Appl. Math. 68(2), 293 (2010)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Duits, R., Franken, E.: Left-invariant diffusions on the space of positions and orientations and their application to crossing-preserving smoothing of HARDI images. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 12(3), 231 (2011). Published online: doi:10.1007/s11263-010-0332-z

    Google Scholar 

  36. O’Donnell, L., Haker, S., Westin, C.F.: New approaches to estimation of white matter connectivity in diffusion tensor MRI: elliptic PDEs and geodesics in a tensor-warped space. In: Dohi, T., Kikinis, R. (eds.) Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention—MICCAI 2002, Tokyo, 25–28 Sept 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2488–2489, pp. 459–466. Springer, Berlin (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Astola, L.J., Florack, L.M.J.: Finsler geometry on higher order tensor fields and applications to high angular resolution diffusion imaging. In: Tai, X.C., Mørken, K., Lysaker, M., Lie, K.A. (eds.) Scale Space and Variational Methods in Computer Vision: Proceedings of the Second International Conference, SSVM 2009, Voss. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5567, pp. 224–234. Springer, Berlin (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  38. Astola, L.J.: Multi-scale Riemann-Finsler geometry: applications to diffusion tensor imaging and high resolution diffusion imaging. Ph.D. thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology, Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Eindhoven (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Astola, L.J., Florack, L.M.J.: Finsler geometry on higher order tensor fields and applications to high angular resolution diffusion imaging. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 92(3), 325 (2011). doi:10.1007/s11263-010-0377-z

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  40. Astola, L.J., Jalba, A.C., Balmashnova, E.G., Florack, L.M.J.: Finsler streamline tracking with single tensor orientation distribution function for high angular resolution diffusion imaging. J. Math. Imaging Vis. 41(3), 170 (2011)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  41. Melonakos, J., Pichon, E., Angenent, S., Tannenbaum, A.: Finsler active contours. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 30(3), 412 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Bao, D., Chern, S.S., Shen, Z.: An Introduction to Riemann-Finsler Geometry. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 2000. Springer, New York (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Rund, H.: The Differential Geometry of Finsler Spaces. Springer, Berlin (1959)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Shen, Z.: Lectures on Finsler Geometry. World Scientific, Singapore (2001)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Mo, X.: An Introduction to Finsler Geometry. Peking University Series in Mathematics, vol. 1. World Scientific, Singapore (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Riemann, B.: Über die Hypothesen, welche der Geometrie zu Grunde liegen. In: Weber, H. (ed.) Gesammelte Mathematische Werke, pp. 272–287. Teubner, Leibzig (1892)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Finsler, P.: Ueber kurven und Flächen in allgemeinen Räumen. Ph.D. thesis, University of Göttingen,, Göttingen (1918)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Cartan, E.: Les Espaces de Finsler. Hermann, Paris (1934)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  49. Michailovich, O., Rathi, Y., Dolui, S.: Spatially regularized compressed sensing for high angular resolution diffusion imaging. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 30(5), 1100 (2011). doi:10.1109/TMI.2011.2142189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Stejskal, E.O., Tanner, J.E.: Spin diffusion measurements: Spin echoes in the presence of a time-dependent field gradient. J. Comput. Phys. 42(1), 288 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Bloch, F.: Nuclear induction. Phys. Rev. 70, 460 (1946)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Haacke, E.M., Brown, R.W., Thompson, M.R., Venkatesan, R.: Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Physical Principles and Sequence Design. Wiley, New York (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Stejskal, E.O.: Use of spin echoes in a pulsed magnetic-field gradient to study anisotropic, restricted diffusion and flow. J. Comput. Phys. 43(10), 3597 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Torrey, H.C.: Bloch equations with diffusion terms. Phys. Rev. D 104, 563 (1956)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Sinnaeve, D.: The Stejskal-Tanner equation generalized for any gradient shape—an overview of most pulse sequences measuring free diffusion. Concepts Magn. Reson. Part A 40A(2), 39 (2012). doi:10.1002/cmr.a.21223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Panagiotaki, E., Schneider, T., Siow, B., Hall, M.G., Lythgoe, M.F., Alexander, D.C.: Compartment models of the diffusion MR signal in brain white matter: a taxonomy and comparison. NeuroImage 59(3), 2241 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Fieremans, E., Jensen, J.H., Helpern, J.A.: White matter characterization with diffusional kurtosis imaging. NeuroImage 58(1), 177 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Hao, X., Whitaker, R.T., Fletcher, P.T.: Adaptive Riemannian metrics for improved geodesic tracking of white matter. In: Székely, G., Hahn, H.K. (eds.) Proceedings of the Twenty-Second International Conference on Information Processing in Medical Imaging–IPMI 2011, Kloster Irsee. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6801, pp. 13–24. Springer, Berlin (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  59. Fuster, A., Dela Haije, T.C.J., Florack, L.M.J.: On the Riemannian rationale for diffusion tensor imaging. In: Y. Wiaux, E.D. McEwen (eds.) Proceedings of the International BASP Frontiers Workshop 2013, BASP 2013, Villars-Sur-Ollon, 27 Jan–1 Feb 2013, p. 62 (2013) http://baspfrontiers.epfl.ch/proceedings.pdf

  60. Rund, H.: The Hamilton-Jacobi Theory in the Calculus of Variations. Robert E. Krieger Publishing Company, Huntington (1973)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  61. Huygens, C.: Traité de la Lumière. Pierre van der Aa, Leiden (1690)

    Google Scholar 

  62. Kingsley, P.B.: Introduction to diffusion tensor imaging mathematics: part I. Tensors, rotations, and eigenvectors. Concepts Magn. Reson. Part A 28A(2), 101 (2006). doi:10.1002/cmr.a.20048

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luc Florack .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: Horizontal and Vertical Splitting

Appendix: Horizontal and Vertical Splitting

We may consider the partial derivatives with respect to x i and \(\dot{x}^{i}\) as coordinate vector fields on the tangent bundle TM, and consider the effect induced by a change of coordinates of the base manifold M, x = x(ξ) say. Since \(\dot{x}\) is a vector, this induces the following vector transformation law for its components \(\dot{x}^{i}\) expressed in terms of its new components, \(\dot{\xi }^{p}\), say:

$$\displaystyle\begin{array}{rcl} \dot{x}^{i} = \frac{\partial x^{i}} {\partial \xi ^{p}} \dot{\xi }^{p}\,,& &{}\end{array}$$
(63)

or, equivalently,

$$\displaystyle\begin{array}{rcl} \frac{\partial } {\partial \dot{\xi }^{p}} = \frac{\partial x^{i}} {\partial \xi ^{p}} \frac{\partial } {\partial \dot{x}^{i}}\,,& &{}\end{array}$$
(64)

so that, by construction,

$$\displaystyle\begin{array}{rcl} \dot{x}^{i} \frac{\partial } {\partial x^{i}} = \dot{\xi }^{p} \frac{\partial } {\partial \xi ^{p}}\,.& &{}\end{array}$$
(65)

As a result,

$$\displaystyle\begin{array}{rcl} \frac{\partial } {\partial \xi ^{p}} = \frac{\partial x^{i}} {\partial \xi ^{p}} \frac{\partial } {\partial x^{i}} + \frac{\partial ^{2}x^{i}} {\partial \xi ^{p}\partial \xi ^{q}}\dot{\xi }^{q} \frac{\partial } {\partial \dot{x}^{i}}\,.& &{}\end{array}$$
(66)

Given the definition of the horizontal vectors, Eq. (22), and of the nonlinear connection, Eq. (23), it is then a tedious but straightforward exercise to deduce that

$$\displaystyle{ \frac{\delta } {\delta \xi ^{p}} = \frac{\partial x^{i}} {\partial \xi ^{p}} \frac{\delta } {\delta x^{i}}\,, }$$
(67)

similar to the vector transformation law for the vertical components, recall Eq. (64).

Likewise one has the covector transformation law for the components of the horizontal and vertical one-forms, recall Eq. (33):

$$\displaystyle{ \mathit{dx}^{i} = \frac{\partial x^{i}} {\partial \xi ^{p}} d\xi ^{p}\,, }$$
(68)

respectively

$$\displaystyle{ \delta \dot{x}^{i} = \frac{\partial x^{i}} {\partial \xi ^{p}} \delta \dot{\xi }^{i}\,. }$$
(69)

The “natural” transformation behavior expressed by Eqs. (64) and (67)–(69) motivates the definitions of horizontal and vertical vectors and covectors in Sect. 2.6.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Florack, L., Fuster, A. (2014). Riemann-Finsler Geometry for Diffusion Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging. In: Westin, CF., Vilanova, A., Burgeth, B. (eds) Visualization and Processing of Tensors and Higher Order Descriptors for Multi-Valued Data. Mathematics and Visualization. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54301-2_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics