A Self-organising Approach for Smart Meter Communication Systems

  • Markus Gerhard Tauber
  • Florian Skopik
  • Thomas Bleier
  • David Hutchison
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8221)


Future energy grids will need to cope with a multitude of new, dynamic situations. Having sufficient information about energy usage patterns is of paramount importance for the grid to react to changing situations and to make the grid ‘smart’. We present preliminary results from an investigation on whether autonomic adaptation of intervals with which individual smart meters report their meter readings can be more effective than commonly used static configurations. A small reporting interval provides close to real-time knowledge about load changes and thus gives the opportunity to balance the energy demand amongst consumers rather than ‘burning’ surplus capacities. On the other hand, a small interval results in a waste of processing power and bandwidth in case of customers that have rather static energy usage behaviour. Hence, an ideal interval cannot be predicted a priori, but needs to be adapted dynamically.We provide an analytical investigation of the effects of autonomic management of smart meter reading intervals, and we make some recommendations on how this scheme can be implemented.


Smart Grid Power Grid Energy Usage Surplus Capacity Congestion Game 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Ibars, C., Navarro, M., Giupponi, L.: Distributed demand management in smart grid with a congestion game. In: SmartGridComm, pp. 495–500 (October 2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kephart, J.O., Chess, D.M.: The Vision of Autonomic Computing. IEEE Computer 36(1), 41–50 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Khurana, H., Hadley, M., Lu, N., Frincke, D.A.: Smart-grid security issues. IEEE Security & Privacy 8(1), 81–85 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Metke, A.R., Ekl, R.L.: Security technology for smart grid networks. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid 1(1), 99–107 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Molina-Markham, A., Shenoy, P., Fu, K., Cecchet, E., Irwin, D.: Private memoirs of a smart meter. In: ACM Build Sys, pp. 61–66 (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    NIST: Nistir 7628: Guidelines for smart grid cyber security, Vol. 2, privacy and the smart grid. Tech. rep. (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sensus: Flexnet ami system,
  8. 8.
    Skopik, F.: Security is not enough! on privacy challenges in smart grids. Int’l J. of Smart Grid and Clean Energy 1(1), 7–14 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tauber, M., et al.: Self-adaptation applied to peer-set maintenance in chord via a generic autonomic management framework. In: SASOW, pp. 9–16 (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wei, D., et al.: An integrated security system of protecting smart grid against cyber attacks. In: Innov. Smart Grid Tech., pp. 1–7 (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Markus Gerhard Tauber
    • 1
  • Florian Skopik
    • 1
  • Thomas Bleier
    • 1
  • David Hutchison
    • 2
  1. 1.AIT, Austrian Institute of TechnologyAustria
  2. 2.Lancaster UniversityUK

Personalised recommendations