Abstract
Contract Management becomes increasingly important for companies and public administrations alike. Obligations and liabilities are described in contract clauses that are often buried in documents of a hundred pages and more. Although commercial Contract Management Systems (CMS) are available, with a few exceptions relevant information has to be extracted manually which is time consuming and error prone. But even if information extraction is automated and contracts are managed using a CMS, dealing with obligations is still a challenge. Whereas the CMSs deal well with time triggered obligations like periodical payments by setting up corresponding workflows, they fail to trigger obligations based on events, as this knowledge is out of the systems’ scope. We introduce an approach to fill the gap as we relate information about the obligations managed in a CMS with background knowledge modelled in an ontology. The ontology is a formal representation of an enterprise architecture extended by top-level concepts. Motivating scenario for the approach is the contract management of a large company. For proof of concept a prototype has been developed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anon: Contract Management: Optimizing Revenues and Capturing Savings. Contract Lifecycle Management and the CFO (2007), http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_pwwi/is_200705/ai_n19058810/ (accessed April 19, 2012)
Arenas, M., et al.: 2011. A Direct Mapping of Relational Data to RDF. W3C Working Draft 20 September 2011, pp. 1–11 (September 2011)
Auer, S., et al.: Use Cases and Requirements for Mapping Relational Databases to RDF. W3C Working Draft 2 June 2010, pp. 1–18 (June 2010), http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/use-cases/ (accessed January 26, 2012)
Barrasa, J., Corcho, Ă“., GĂłmez-PĂ©rez, A.: R2O, an Extensible and Semantically Based Database- to-ontology Mapping Language. In: Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Semantic Web and Databases (SWDB 2004), Toronto, Canada (2004)
Bertolazzi, P., et al.: An Approach to the Definition of a Core Enterprise Ontology: CEO. In: International Workshop on Open Enterprise Solutions: Systems, Experiences, and Organizations - OES-SEO 2001, Rome, pp. 104–115 (2001)
Bizer, C., Heath, T., Berners-Lee, T.: Linked Data - The Story So Far. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS) 5(3), 1–22 (2009)
Das, S., Sundara, S., Cyganiak, R. (eds.): R2RM: RDB to RDF Mapping Language. W3C Working Draft 20 September 2011, pp. 1–32 (November 2011), http://www.w3.org/TR/r2rml/ (accessed January 26, 2012)
Dietz, J.L.G.: Enterprise Ontology. Theory and Methodology. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Dimitrakos, T., Golby, D., Kearney, P.: Towards a Trust and Contract Management Framework for dynamic Virtual Organisations. In: Proceedings of the eChallenges Conference (eChallenges 2004), Vienna, Austria (2004)
DoDAF. DoD Architecture Framework Volume I: Definitions and Guidelines. Architecture, I, pp.1-46 (April 2007)
Fox, M.S., Grüninger, M.: Enterprise Modeling. AI Magazine 19(3), 109–121 (1998)
Fox, M.S., Grüninger, M.: On Ontologies and Enterprise Modelling. In: International Conference on Enterprise Integration Modelling Technology, vol. 97. Springer (1997), http://www.eil.utoronto.ca/enterprise-modelling/papers/fox-eimt97.pdf
Goetz, C.J., Scott, R.E.: Mitigation Principle: Toward a General Theory of Contractual Obligation. Virginia Law Review 69(6) (1983), https://litigation-essentials.lexisnexis.com/webcd/app?action=DocumentDisplay&crawlid=1&srctype=smi&srcid=3B15&doctype=cite&docid=69+Va.+L.+Rev.+967&key=2c499ddc896515ef43456ba87a993188
Grosse-Ruyken, P.T., Wagner, S.M.: APPRIS Project Report, ZĂĽrich (2011)
Hert, M., Reif, G., Gall, H.C.: A Comparison of RDB-to-RDF Mapping Languages. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Semantic Systems, Graz, Austria, pp. 25–32 (2001), http://dl.acm.org/ft_gateway.cfm?id=2063522&ftid=1054499&dwn=1&CFID=81605256&CFTOKEN=14608054
Hinkelmann, K., Merelli, E., Thönssen, B.: The Role of Content and Context in Enterprise Repositories. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Advanced Enterprise Architecture and Repositories - AER (2010)
IACCM, Contract Management Software. Market Sizing and Status Report (2007)
Kang, D., et al.: An ontology-based Enterprise Architecture. Expert Systems With Applications 37(2), 1456–1464 (2010), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.06.073
Kontchakov, R., et al.: The Combined Approach to Query Answering in DL-Lite. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on the Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 2010), Toronto, Canada, pp. 247–257 (2010)
Leppänen, M.: A Context-Based Enterprise Ontology. In: Guizzardi, G., Wagner, G. (eds.) Proceedings of the EDOC International Workshop on Vocabularies, Ontologies and Rules for the Enterprise (VORTE 2005), pp. 17–24. Springer, Enschede (2005)
Matthes, D.: Enterprise Architecture Frameworks Kompendium. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Sahoo, S.S., et al.: A Survey of Current Approaches for Mapping of Relational Databases to RDF, pp. 1–15 (2009)
Spanos, D.-E., Stavrou, P., Mitrou, N.: Bringing relational databases into the Semantic Web: A survey. Semantic Web – Interoperability, Usability, Applicability, 1–41 (2011)
The Open Group, ArchiMate 1.0 Specification (2009), http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20087110
Thönssen, B.: An Enterprise Ontology Building the Bases for Automatic Metadata Generation. In: Sánchez-Alonso, S., Athanasiadis, I.N. (eds.) MTSR 2010. CCIS, vol. 108, pp. 195–210. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Thönssen, B., Wolff, D.: A broader view on Context Models to support Business Process Agility. In: Smolnik, S., Teuteberg, F., Thomas, O. (eds.) Semantic Technologies for Business and Information Systems Engineering: Concepts and Applications (2010)
Uschold, M., Williamson, K., Clark, P.: Ontology Reuse and Application. In: Guarino, N. (ed.) Proceedings of the First International Conference FOI 1998, Trento, Italy, pp. 179–192 (1998)
W3C Working Group (2011), RDB2RDF Implementations, http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/Implementations (accessed January 25, 2012)
Wick, M.: GeoNames, http://www.geonames.org/ (accessed April 22, 2012)
Wilson, E.M.: TrustCoM Project Final Report V1 (2007), ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/ist/docs/st/trustcom-finalreport_en.pdf
Wilson, M., Arenas, A., Schubert, L.: The TrustCoM Framework for trust, security and contract management of web services and the Grid - V2, (2006), http://www.clrc.ac.uk/Activity/ACTIVITY=Publications;SECTION=225
Yu, L.: Developer’s Guide to the Semantic Web online. A. Springer (2011), http://lib.myilibrary.com?ID=308236
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Thönssen, B., Lutz, J. (2013). Semantically Enriched Obligation Management: An Approach for Improving the Handling of Obligations Represented in Contracts. In: Fred, A., Dietz, J.L.G., Liu, K., Filipe, J. (eds) Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management. IC3K 2012. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 415. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54105-6_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54105-6_23
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-54104-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-54105-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)