Skip to main content

Semantically Enriched Obligation Management: An Approach for Improving the Handling of Obligations Represented in Contracts

  • Conference paper
Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (IC3K 2012)

Abstract

Contract Management becomes increasingly important for companies and public administrations alike. Obligations and liabilities are described in contract clauses that are often buried in documents of a hundred pages and more. Although commercial Contract Management Systems (CMS) are available, with a few exceptions relevant information has to be extracted manually which is time consuming and error prone. But even if information extraction is automated and contracts are managed using a CMS, dealing with obligations is still a challenge. Whereas the CMSs deal well with time triggered obligations like periodical payments by setting up corresponding workflows, they fail to trigger obligations based on events, as this knowledge is out of the systems’ scope. We introduce an approach to fill the gap as we relate information about the obligations managed in a CMS with background knowledge modelled in an ontology. The ontology is a formal representation of an enterprise architecture extended by top-level concepts. Motivating scenario for the approach is the contract management of a large company. For proof of concept a prototype has been developed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anon: Contract Management: Optimizing Revenues and Capturing Savings. Contract Lifecycle Management and the CFO (2007), http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_pwwi/is_200705/ai_n19058810/ (accessed April 19, 2012)

  2. Arenas, M., et al.: 2011. A Direct Mapping of Relational Data to RDF. W3C Working Draft 20 September 2011, pp. 1–11 (September 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Auer, S., et al.: Use Cases and Requirements for Mapping Relational Databases to RDF. W3C Working Draft 2 June 2010, pp. 1–18 (June 2010), http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/use-cases/ (accessed January 26, 2012)

  4. Barrasa, J., Corcho, Ă“., GĂłmez-PĂ©rez, A.: R2O, an Extensible and Semantically Based Database- to-ontology Mapping Language. In: Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Semantic Web and Databases (SWDB 2004), Toronto, Canada (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bertolazzi, P., et al.: An Approach to the Definition of a Core Enterprise Ontology: CEO. In: International Workshop on Open Enterprise Solutions: Systems, Experiences, and Organizations - OES-SEO 2001, Rome, pp. 104–115 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bizer, C., Heath, T., Berners-Lee, T.: Linked Data - The Story So Far. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS) 5(3), 1–22 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Das, S., Sundara, S., Cyganiak, R. (eds.): R2RM: RDB to RDF Mapping Language. W3C Working Draft 20 September 2011, pp. 1–32 (November 2011), http://www.w3.org/TR/r2rml/ (accessed January 26, 2012)

  8. Dietz, J.L.G.: Enterprise Ontology. Theory and Methodology. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Dimitrakos, T., Golby, D., Kearney, P.: Towards a Trust and Contract Management Framework for dynamic Virtual Organisations. In: Proceedings of the eChallenges Conference (eChallenges 2004), Vienna, Austria (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. DoDAF. DoD Architecture Framework Volume I: Definitions and Guidelines. Architecture, I, pp.1-46 (April 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fox, M.S., Grüninger, M.: Enterprise Modeling. AI Magazine 19(3), 109–121 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fox, M.S., Grüninger, M.: On Ontologies and Enterprise Modelling. In: International Conference on Enterprise Integration Modelling Technology, vol. 97. Springer (1997), http://www.eil.utoronto.ca/enterprise-modelling/papers/fox-eimt97.pdf

  13. Goetz, C.J., Scott, R.E.: Mitigation Principle: Toward a General Theory of Contractual Obligation. Virginia Law Review 69(6) (1983), https://litigation-essentials.lexisnexis.com/webcd/app?action=DocumentDisplay&crawlid=1&srctype=smi&srcid=3B15&doctype=cite&docid=69+Va.+L.+Rev.+967&key=2c499ddc896515ef43456ba87a993188

  14. Grosse-Ruyken, P.T., Wagner, S.M.: APPRIS Project Report, ZĂĽrich (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hert, M., Reif, G., Gall, H.C.: A Comparison of RDB-to-RDF Mapping Languages. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Semantic Systems, Graz, Austria, pp. 25–32 (2001), http://dl.acm.org/ft_gateway.cfm?id=2063522&ftid=1054499&dwn=1&CFID=81605256&CFTOKEN=14608054

  16. Hinkelmann, K., Merelli, E., Thönssen, B.: The Role of Content and Context in Enterprise Repositories. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Advanced Enterprise Architecture and Repositories - AER (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. IACCM, Contract Management Software. Market Sizing and Status Report (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kang, D., et al.: An ontology-based Enterprise Architecture. Expert Systems With Applications 37(2), 1456–1464 (2010), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.06.073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kontchakov, R., et al.: The Combined Approach to Query Answering in DL-Lite. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on the Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 2010), Toronto, Canada, pp. 247–257 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Leppänen, M.: A Context-Based Enterprise Ontology. In: Guizzardi, G., Wagner, G. (eds.) Proceedings of the EDOC International Workshop on Vocabularies, Ontologies and Rules for the Enterprise (VORTE 2005), pp. 17–24. Springer, Enschede (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Matthes, D.: Enterprise Architecture Frameworks Kompendium. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Sahoo, S.S., et al.: A Survey of Current Approaches for Mapping of Relational Databases to RDF, pp. 1–15 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Spanos, D.-E., Stavrou, P., Mitrou, N.: Bringing relational databases into the Semantic Web: A survey. Semantic Web – Interoperability, Usability, Applicability, 1–41 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  24. The Open Group, ArchiMate 1.0 Specification (2009), http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20087110

  25. Thönssen, B.: An Enterprise Ontology Building the Bases for Automatic Metadata Generation. In: Sánchez-Alonso, S., Athanasiadis, I.N. (eds.) MTSR 2010. CCIS, vol. 108, pp. 195–210. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Thönssen, B., Wolff, D.: A broader view on Context Models to support Business Process Agility. In: Smolnik, S., Teuteberg, F., Thomas, O. (eds.) Semantic Technologies for Business and Information Systems Engineering: Concepts and Applications (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Uschold, M., Williamson, K., Clark, P.: Ontology Reuse and Application. In: Guarino, N. (ed.) Proceedings of the First International Conference FOI 1998, Trento, Italy, pp. 179–192 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  28. W3C Working Group (2011), RDB2RDF Implementations, http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/Implementations (accessed January 25, 2012)

  29. Wick, M.: GeoNames, http://www.geonames.org/ (accessed April 22, 2012)

  30. Wilson, E.M.: TrustCoM Project Final Report V1 (2007), ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/ist/docs/st/trustcom-finalreport_en.pdf

  31. Wilson, M., Arenas, A., Schubert, L.: The TrustCoM Framework for trust, security and contract management of web services and the Grid - V2, (2006), http://www.clrc.ac.uk/Activity/ACTIVITY=Publications;SECTION=225

  32. Yu, L.: Developer’s Guide to the Semantic Web online. A. Springer (2011), http://lib.myilibrary.com?ID=308236

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Thönssen, B., Lutz, J. (2013). Semantically Enriched Obligation Management: An Approach for Improving the Handling of Obligations Represented in Contracts. In: Fred, A., Dietz, J.L.G., Liu, K., Filipe, J. (eds) Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management. IC3K 2012. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 415. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54105-6_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54105-6_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-54104-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-54105-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics