Skip to main content

ROM: An Approach to Self-consistency Verification of a Runnable Ontology Model

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 415))

Abstract

In the quest for the highest possible abstraction of software systems, Runnable Knowledge has been proposed for MDA. But in order to be useful in practice as a system design, it must be amenable to verification. This work precisely describes the necessary steps by which ROM – a Runnable Ontology Model tool – concurrently generates a running model and its respective test script from the designed Runnable Knowledge, allowing verification that the model is self-consistent. The novel implementation idea is to use ready-made mock object libraries to efficiently obtain the code for a running model. Detailed examples are provided to illustrate each of the ROM generation steps.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Exman, I., Llorens, J., Fraga, A.: Software Knowledge. In: Exman, I., Llorens, J., Fraga, A. (eds.) Proc. SKY 2010 Int. Workshop on Software Engineering, pp. 9–12 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wynne, M., Hellesoy, A.: The Cucumber Book: Behaviour Driven Development for Testers and Developers, Pragmatic Programmer, New York, USA (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mellor, S.J., Balcer, M.J.: Executable UML – A Foundation for Model-Driven Architecture. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Freeman, S., Pryce, N.: Growing Object-Oriented Software. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Beck, K.: Test Driven Development: By Example. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Adzic, G.: Bridging the Communication Gap: Specification by Example and Agile Acceptance Testing. Neuri, London (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. North, D.: Introducing Behaviour Driven Development. Better Software Magazine (2006), http://dannorth.net/introducing-bdd/

  8. Adzic, G.: Specification by Example – How Successful Teams Deliver the Right Software, Manning, New York, USA (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brown, K.: Taking executable specs to the next level: Executable Documentation, Blog post (2011), http://keithps.wordpress.com/2011/06/26/taking-executable-specs-to-the-next-level-executable-documentation/

  10. Adzic, G.: Test Driven.NET Development with FitNesse. Neuri, London (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. SpecFlow – Pragmatic BDD for .NET (2010), http://specflow.org

  12. Yagel, R.: Can Executable Specifications Close the Gap between Software Requirements and Implementation? In: Exman, I., Llorens, J., Fraga, A. (eds.) Proc. SKY 2011 Int. Workshop on Software Engineering, pp. 87–91. SciTePress, Portugal (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Calero, C., Ruiz, F., Piattini, M. (eds.): Ontologies in Software Engineering and Software Technology. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Meszaros, G.: xUnit Test Patterns: Refactoring Test Code. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Exman, I.: Web Search of New Linearized Medical Drug Leads. In: Exman, I., Llorens, J., Fraga, A. (eds.) Proc. SKY 2011 Int. Workshop on Software Engineering, pp. 108–115. SciTePress, Portugal (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chelimsky, D., Astels, D., Dennis, Z., Hellesoy, A., Helmkamp, B., North, D.: The RSpec Book: Behaviour Driven Developmentwith RSpec, Cucumber, and Friends, Pragmatic Programmer, New York, USA (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. NUnit (2012), http://www.nunit.org

  18. Jetbrains. Resharper – productivity add-on for Microsoft Visual Studio (2013), http://www.jetbrains.com/resharper/

  19. NSubstitute. A friendly substitute for .NET mocking frameworks (2013), http://nsubstitute.github.com/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Exman, I., Yagel, R. (2013). ROM: An Approach to Self-consistency Verification of a Runnable Ontology Model. In: Fred, A., Dietz, J.L.G., Liu, K., Filipe, J. (eds) Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management. IC3K 2012. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 415. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54105-6_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54105-6_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-54104-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-54105-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics