A Semantic Web Information Integration System Based on Ontology-Mapping and Multilevel Query Interface

  • Zhicheng Wan
  • Yifan Zhai
  • Haibo Yu
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 406)


The Semantic Web has introduced various distributed and dynamically increasing knowledge bases that are built on formal logic. At present, however, each knowledge base has merely a certain or some limited types of information, which are insufficient in consideration that users demands may involve extra information in most cases. Moreover, current knowledge bases are generally constructed on a mixture of ontologies, which more or less cause difficulties in the searching and integration of semantic data. Besides, a great majority of users are incapable of utilizing semantic searching. Above all, therefore, this study designed and implemented a system that allows different groups of users to query semantic information from multiple sources through a unified user-friendly interface by introducing a multilevel searching interface, which provides four fundamental input methods that allows users to generate formal query as well as proposing a processing method that achieves ontology mapping, automatic searching and integration of data from different knowledge bases. The evaluation experiments were conducted and the results of which showed that the usability and performance of our system are reasonable.


information integration ontology mapping semantic search interface query method 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Lopez, V., Motta, E., Uren, V.S.: PowerAqua: Fishing the Semantic Web. In: Sure, Y., Domingue, J. (eds.) ESWC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4011, pp. 393–410. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Bowen, P.L., Chang, C.J.A., Rohde, F.H.: Non-Length Based Query Challenges: An Initial Taxonomy. In: WITS 2004, Washington, D.C., pp. 74–79 (2004)Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Schwitter, R., Tilbrook, M.: Dynamic Semantics at Work. In: International Workshop on Logic and Engineering of Natural Language Semantics, Kanazawa, Japan, pp. 49–60 (2004)Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Hermes: Data Web search on a pay-as-you-go integration infrastructure. J. Web Sem. 7(3), 189–203 (2009)Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Andreason, T.: An Approach to Knowledge-based Query Evaluation. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 140(1), 75–91 (2003)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Minock, M.: A Phrasal Approach to Natural Language Interfaces over Databases. Umeå Techreport UMINF-05.09. University of Umeå, Sweden (2005)Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Wang, H., Zhang, K., Liu, Q., Tran, T., Yu, Y.: Q2Semantic: A lightweight keyword interface to semantic search. In: Bechhofer, S., Hauswirth, M., Hoffmann, J., Koubarakis, M. (eds.) ESWC 2008. LNCS, vol. 5021, pp. 584–598. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Distelhorst, G., et al.: A Prototype Natural Language Interface to a Large Complex Knowledge Base, the Foundational Model of Anatomy. In: American Medical Informatics Association Annual Fall Symposium, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 200–204 (2003)Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Katz, B., et al.: Natural Language Annotations for the Semantic Web. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds.) CoopIS/DOA/ODBASE 2002. LNCS, vol. 2519, pp. 1317–1331. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Dittenbach, M., Merkl, D., Berger, H.: A Natural Language Query Interface for Tourism Information. In: ENTER 2003, Helsinki, Finland, pp. 152–162 (2003)Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Fazzinga, B., Gianforme, G., Gottlob, G., Lukasiewicz, T.: Semantic Web search based on ontological conjunctive queries. J. Web Sem. 9(4), 453–473 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Search Interface based on Domain Knowledge Extraction: Drexel University College of Info Science & Technology Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA (2012)Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Kaufmann, E., Bernstein, A.: Evaluating the usability of natural language query languages and interfaces to Semantic Web knowledge bases. J. Web Sem. 8(4), 377–393 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Aumueller, D., Do, H.H., Massmann, S., Rahm, E.: Schema and ontology matching with COMA++. In: Ã-zcan, F. (ed.) SIGMOD Conference, pp. 906–908. ACM (2005)Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    David, J., Guillet, F., Briand, H.: Matching directories and OWL ontologies with AROMA. ACM (2006)Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Deutsch, A., Ludascher, B., Nash, A.: Rewriting queries using views with access patterns under integrity constraints. Theoretical Computer Science 371(3), 200–226 (2007)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Calì, A., Calvanese, D., Giacomo, G.D., Lenzerini, M.: Data Integration under Integrity Constraints. In: CAiSE (2006)Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Fazzinga, B., Lukasiewicz, T.: Semantic search on the Web. Semantic Web 1(1-2), 89–96 (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zhicheng Wan
    • 1
  • Yifan Zhai
    • 1
  • Haibo Yu
    • 1
  1. 1.Shanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiP.R. China

Personalised recommendations