Scheidung: Verläufe und Determinanten der psychischen Adaptation

  • Pasqualina Perrig-Chiello
  • Bina Knöpfli
Part of the Springer Reference Psychologie book series (SRP)


Eheliche Trennungen und Scheidungen gehören zu den häufigsten und zugleich schwierigsten biografischen Transitionen des mittleren Erwachsenenalters. In der Scheidungsforschung sind vor allem die negativen Auswirkungen der Scheidung gut belegt. Allerdings gibt es große individuelle Unterschiede bei der psychischen Adaptation, die noch nicht genügend verstanden werden. In diesem Beitrag sollen zunächst die Auswirkungen einer Scheidung sowie die individuellen Unterschiede bei der psychischen Adaptation ausgeleuchtet werden. Des Weiteren interessieren die Determinanten, die zu den unterschiedlichen Adaptationsverläufen führen.


Eheliche Trennung Krise Biografische Transition Psychische Adaptation Individuelle Unterschiede Resilienz Vulnerabilität 


  1. Amato, P. R. (2000). The consequences of divorce for adults and children. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62(4), 1269–1287. Scholar
  2. Amato, P. R. (2010). Research on divorce: Continuing trends and new developments. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 650–666. Scholar
  3. Amato, P. R., & Hohmann-Marriott, B. (2007). A comparison of high- and low-distress marriages that end in divorce. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69(3), 621–638. Scholar
  4. Bierman, A., Fazio, E. M., & Milkie, M. A. (2006). A multifaceted approach to the mental health advantage of the married: Assessing how explanations vary by outcome measure and unmarried group. Journal of Family Issues, 27(4), 554–582. Scholar
  5. Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2008). Is well-being U-shaped over the life cycle? Social Science & Medicine, 66(8), 1733–1749. Scholar
  6. Bonanno, G. A. (2004). Loss, trauma, and human resilience: Have we underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely aversive events? American Psychologist, 59(1), 20–28. Scholar
  7. Braver, S. L., Shapiro, J. R., & Goodman, M. (2006). The consequences of divorce for parents. In M. A. Fine & J. H. Harvey (Hrsg.), Handbook of divorce and relationship dissolution (S. 313–337). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  8. Brickman, P., & Campbell, D. T. (1971). Hedonic relativism and planning the good society. In M. H. Appley (Hrsg.), Adaptation level theory: A symposium (S. 287–302). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, A., & Jones, J. M. (2012). Separation, divorce linked to sharply lower wellbeing- married Americans have highest wellbeing. Gallup. Zugegriffen am 28.01.2014.
  10. Bundesamt für Statistik. (2012a). Bevölkerungsbewegung – Indikatoren: Zusammengefasste Scheidungsziffer. Bundesamt für Statistik. Zugegriffen am 01.02.2014.
  11. Bundesamt für Statistik. (2012b). Scheidungen nach gegenseitigem Alter der Ehegatten 1969–2012. Bundesamt für Statistik. Zugegriffen am 02.02.2014.
  12. Chiriboga, D. A., Brierton, P., Krystal, S., & Pierce, R. C. (1982). Antecedents of symptom expression during marital separation. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38(4), 732–741.<732::aid-jclp2270380407>;2-3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Clark, A.E., & Georgellis, Y. (2010). Back to baseline in Britain: Adaptation in the BHPS (PSE Working Paper No. 02). Paris School of Economics.Google Scholar
  14. Clarke-Stewart, A., & Brentano, C. (2006). Divorce: Causes and consequences. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  15. De Jong Gierveld, J., & Van Tilburg, T. (2006). A 6-Item scale for overall, emotional, and social loneliness: Confirmatory tests on survey data. Research on Aging, 28(5), 582–598. Scholar
  16. De Jong Gierveld, J., & Van Tilburg, T. (2010). The De Jong Gierveld short scales for emotional and social loneliness: Tested on data from 7 countries in the UN generations and gender surveys. European Journal of Ageing, 7(2), 121–130. Scholar
  17. Demografie Portal. (2010). Hohe Scheidungsziffer hat sich in Deutschland etabliert. Zusammengefasste Ehescheidungsziffer in West-, Ost- und Gesamtdeutschland, 1990–2010. Demografie Portal. Zugegriffen am 03.02.2014.
  18. Dykstra, P. A., & Fokkema, T. (2007). Social and emotional loneliness among divorced and married men and women: Comparing the deficit and cognitive perspectives. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 29(1), 1–12. Scholar
  19. Emmerling, D. (2007). Ehescheidungen 2005. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt.Google Scholar
  20. Emery, R. E. (1994). Renegotiating family relationships: Divorce, child custody, and mediation. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  21. Gähler, M. (2006). „To Divorce Is to Die a Bit …“: A longitudinal study of marital disruption and psychological distress among Swedish women and men. The Family Journal, 14(4), 372–382. Scholar
  22. Hetherington, E. M. (2003). Intimate pathways: Changing patterns in close personal relationships across time. Family Relations: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied Family Studies, 52(4), 318–331. Scholar
  23. Hetherington, E. M., & Kelly, J. (2002). For better or for worse: Divorce reconsidered. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  24. Hewitt, B., & Turrell, G. (2011). Short-term functional health and well-being after marital separation: Does initiator status make a difference? American Journal of Epidemiology, 173(11), 1308–1318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Holmes, T., & Rahe, R. (1967). The social readjustment rating scale. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 11(2), 213–218. Scholar
  26. Hughes, M. E., & Waite, L. J. (2009). Marital biography and health at mid-life. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 50(3), 344–358. Scholar
  27. Johnson, D. R., & Wu, J. (2002). An empirical test of crisis, social selection, and role explanations of the relationship between marital disruption and psychological distress: A pooled time-series analysis of four-wave panel data. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64(1), 211–224. Scholar
  28. Joseph, S., & Linley, P. (2005). Positive adjustment to threatening events: An organismic valuing theory of growth through adversity. Review of General Psychology, 9(3), 262–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kalmijn, M., & Monden, C. W. (2006). Are the negative effects of divorce on well-being dependent on marital quality? Journal of Marriage and Family, 68(5), 1197–1213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Krumrei, E., Coit, C., Martin, S., Fogo, W., & Mahoney, A. (2007). Post-divorce adjustment and social relationships: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 46(3–4), 145–166. Scholar
  31. Kulik, L., & Heine-Cohen, E. (2011). Coping resources, perceived stress and adjustment to divorce among Israeli women: Assessing effects. The Journal of Social Psychology, 151(1), 5–30. Scholar
  32. Lorenz, F. O., Wickrama, K., Conger, R. D., & Elder, G. H., Jr. (2006). The short-term and decade-long effects of divorce on women’s midlife health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 47(2), 111–125. Scholar
  33. Lucas, R. E. (2005). Time does not heal all wounds. A longitudinal study of reaction and adaptation to divorce. Psychological Science, 16(12), 945–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lucas, R. E. (2007). Adaptation and the set-point model of subjective well-being: Does happiness change after major life events? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(2), 75–79. Scholar
  35. Lucas, R. E., Clark, A. E., Georgellis, Y., & Diener, E. (2003). Reexamining adaptation and the set point model of happiness: Reactions to changes in marital status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(3), 527–539. Scholar
  36. Mancini, A. D., Bonanno, G. A., & Clark, A. E. (2011). Stepping off the hedonic treadmill: Individual differences in response to major life events. Journal of Individual Differences, 32(3), 144–152. Scholar
  37. Marks, N. F., & Lambert, J. D. (1998). Marital status continuity and change among young and midlife adults. Journal of Family Issues, 19(6), 652–686. Scholar
  38. Perrig-Chiello, P. (2011). In der Lebensmitte. Die Entdeckung der mittleren Lebensjahre. Zürich: NZZ libro.Google Scholar
  39. Perrig-Chiello, P. (2014). Wenn Kinder gross und Eltern alt werden – Familiale Veränderungen im mittleren Lebensalter. Staatsinstitut für Frühpädagogik (IFP).
  40. Perrig-Chiello, P., & Perren, S. (2005). Biographical transitions from a midlife perspective. Journal of Adult Development, 12(4), 169–181. Scholar
  41. Perrig-Chiello, P., Hutchison, S., & Hoepflinger, F. (2008). Role involvement and well-being in middle-aged women. Women & Health, 48(3), 303–323. Scholar
  42. Perrig-Chiello, P., Knöpfli, B., & Gloor, U. (2013). Späte Scheidungen: Fakten, Gründe und Auswirkungen. Ein interdisziplinärer Blick auf Ergebnisse einer Schweizer Studie., Die Praxis des Familienrechts, 4, 845–866.Google Scholar
  43. Perrig-Chiello, P., Hutchison, S., & Morselli, D. (2015). Patterns of psychological adaptation to divorce after a long-term marriage. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 32(3), 386–405. Scholar
  44. Peters, A., & Liefbroer, A. C. (1997). Beyond marital status: Partner history and well-being in old age. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59(3), 687–699. Scholar
  45. Pudrovska, T., & Carr, D. (2008). Psychological adjustment to divorce and widowhood in mid- and later life: Do coping strategies and personality protect against psychological distress? Advances in Life Course Research, 13, 283–317. Scholar
  46. Sbarra, D. A., Law, R. W., & Portley, R. M. (2011). Divorce and death: A meta-analysis and research agenda for clinical, social, and health psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(5), 454–474. Scholar
  47. Schulz, F., & Blossfeld, H.-P. (2006). Wie verändert sich die häusliche Arbeitsteilung im Eheverlauf? KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 58(1), 23–49. Scholar
  48. Statista. (2014). Durchschnittliches Alter der Männer und Frauen bei der Scheidung im Jahr 1990 und 2008. Statista. Zugegriffen am 01.02.2014.
  49. Stone, A. A., Schwartz, J. E., Broderick, J. E., & Deaton, A. (2010). A snapshot of the age distribution of psychological well-being in the United States. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(22), 9985–9990. Scholar
  50. Tashiro, T., Frazier, P., & Berman, M. (2006). Stress-related growth following divorce and relationship dissolution. In Handbook of divorce and relationship dissolution (S. 361–384). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  51. Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (2004). Target article: „Posttraumatic growth: Conceptual foundations and empirical evidence“. Psychological Inquiry, 15(1), 1–18. Scholar
  52. Wagner, M., & Weiß, B. (2003). Bilanz der deutschen Scheidungsforschung. Versuch einer Meta-Analyse. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 32, 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Waite, L. J., Luo, Y., & Lewin, A. C. (2009). Marital happiness and marital stability: Consequences for psychological well-being. Social Science Research, 38(1), 201–212. Scholar
  54. Wang, H., & Amato, P. R. (2000). Predictors of divorce adjustment: Stressors, resources, and definitions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62(3), 655–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zhang, Z., & Hayward, M. D. (2006). Gender, the marital life course, and cardiovascular disease in late midlife. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68(3), 639–657. Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.BaselSchweiz
  2. 2.icommit GmbHKüsnachtSchweiz

Personalised recommendations