Skip to main content

Mining Twitter Data for Potential Drug Effects

  • Conference paper
Advanced Data Mining and Applications (ADMA 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 8346))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Adverse drug reactions have become one of the top causes of deaths. For surveillance of adverse drug events, patients have gradually become involved in reporting their experiences with medications through the use of dedicated and structured systems. The emerging of social networking provides a way for patients to describe their drug experiences online in less-structured free text format. We developed a computational approach that collects, processes and analyzes Twitter data for drug effects. Our approach uses a machine-learning-based classifier to classify personal experience tweets, and use NLM’s MetaMap software to recognize and extract word phrases that belong to drug effects. Our results on 5 medications demonstrate the validity of our approach, and its ability to correctly extract potential drug effects from the Twitter data. It is conceivable that social media data can serve to complement and/or supplement traditional time-consuming and costly surveillance methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. World Health Organization. Pharmacovigilance: ensuring the safe use of medicines. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dal Pan, G.J.: Monitoring the safety of medicines used off-label. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 91(5), 787–795 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Edwards, B.J., Gounder, M., McKoy, J.M., Boyd, I., Farrugia, M., Migliorati, C., et al.: Pharmacovigilance and reporting oversight in US FDA fast-track process: bisphosphonates and osteonecrosis of the jaw. Lancet Oncol. 9(12), 1166–1172 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pirmohamed, M., James, S., Meakin, S., Green, C., Scott, A.K., Walley, T.J., et al.: Adverse drug reactions as cause of admission to hospital: prospective analysis of 18 820 patients. BMJ 329(7456), 15–19 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lazarou, J., Pomeranz, B.H., Corey, P.N.: Incidence of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. JAMA 279(15), 1200–1205 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Moore, T.J., Cohen, M.R., Furberg, C.D.: Serious adverse drug events reported to the Food and Drug Administration, 1998-2005. Arch. Intern. Med. 167(16), 1752–1759 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Levinson, D.R., General, I.: Adverse events in hospitals: national incidence among Medicare beneficiaries. Department of Health & Human Services (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Landow, L.: Monitoring adverse drug events: the Food and Drug Administration MedWatch reporting system. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine 23(6), 190–193 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Edwards, I.R.: Pharmacovigilance. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 73(6), 979–982 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Egberts, T.C., Smulders, M., de Koning, F.H., Meyboom, R.H., Leufkens, H.: Can adverse drug reactions be detected earlier? A comparison of reports by patients and professionals. BMJ 313(7056), 530–531 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chunara, R., Andrews, J.R., Brownstein, J.S.: Social and news media enable estimation of epidemiological patterns early in the, Haitian cholera outbreak. Am J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 86(1), 39–45 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Stone, B.: https://blog.twitter.com/2009/whats-happening2009 (cited 2013)

  13. Signorini, A., Segre, A.M., Polgreen, P.: The use of Twitter to track levels of disease activity and public concern in the U.S. during the influenza A H1N1 pandemic. PLoS One 6(5), e19467 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Heaivilin, N., Gerbert, B., Page, J.E., Gibbs, J.L.: Public health surveillance of dental pain via Twitter. J. Dent. Res. 90(9), 1047–1051 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Corley, C.D., Mikler, A.R., Singh, K.P., Cook, D.J.: Monitoring influenza trends through mining social media. In: International Conference on Bioinformatics & Computational Biology (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Knezevic, M.Z., Bivolarevic, I.C., Peric, T.S., Jankovic, S.M.: Using Facebook to increase spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions. Drug Saf. 34(4), 351–352 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Leaman, R., Wojtulewicz, L., Sullivan, R., Skariah, A., Yang, J., Gonzalez, G.: Towards internet-age pharmacovigilance: extracting adverse drug reactions from user posts to health-related social networks. In: Proceedings of the 2010 Workshop on Biomedical Natural Language Processing. Association for Computational Linguistics (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Verma, S., Vieweg, S., Corvey, W.J., Palen, L., Martin, J.H., Palmer, M., et al.: Natural Language Processing to the Rescue?: Extracting ‘Situational Awareness’ Tweets During Mass Emergency. In: Proc ICWSM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Elgersma, E., de Rijke, M.: Personal vs non-personal blogs: Initial classification experiments. In: Proceedings of the 31st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Li, S., Huang, C.-R., Zhou, G., Lee, S.: Employing personal/impersonal views in supervised and semi-supervised sentiment classification. In: Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bird, S.: NLTK: The natural language toolkit. In: Proceedings of the COLING/ACL on Interactive Presentation Sessions. Association for Computational Linguistics (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Aronson, A.R., Lang, F.M.: An overview of MetaMap: historical perspective and recent advances. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 17(3), 229–236 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bian, J., Topaloglu, U., Yu, F.: Towards large-scale twitter mining for drug-related adverse events. In: Proceedings of the 2012 International Workshop on Smart Health and Wellbeing, pp. 25–32. ACM (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jiang, K., Zheng, Y. (2013). Mining Twitter Data for Potential Drug Effects. In: Motoda, H., Wu, Z., Cao, L., Zaiane, O., Yao, M., Wang, W. (eds) Advanced Data Mining and Applications. ADMA 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8346. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-53914-5_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-53914-5_37

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-53913-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-53914-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics