Skip to main content

An Energy Model for Network Community Structure Detection

  • Conference paper
Advanced Data Mining and Applications (ADMA 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 8346))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Community detection problem has been studied for years, but no common definition of community has been agreed upon till now. Former modularity based methods may lose the information among communities, and blockmodel based methods arbitrarily assume the connection probability inside a community is the same. In order to solve these problems, we present an energy model for community detection, which considers the information of the whole network. It does the community detection without knowing the type of network structure in advance. The energy model defines positive energy produced by attraction between two vertices, and negative energy produced by the attraction from other vertices which weakens the attraction between the two vertices. Energy between two vertices is the sum of their positive energy and negative energy. Computing the energy of each community, we may find the community structure when maximizing the sum of these communities energy. Finally, we apply the model to find community structure in real-world networks and artificial networks. The results show that the energy model is applicable to both unipartite networks and bipartite networks, and is able to find community structure successfully without knowing the network structure type.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahn, Y.Y., Bagrow, J.P., Lehmann, S.: Link communities reveal multiscale complexity in networks. Nature 466, U761-U711 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Newman, M.E.J.: Communities, modules and large-scale structure in networks. Nature Physics 8, 25–31 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Spirin, V., Mirny, L.A.: Protein complexes and functional modules in molecular networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100, 12123–12128 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Flake, G.W., Lawrence, S., Giles, C.L., Coetzee, F.M.: Self-organization and identification of web communities. Computer 35, 66 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dourisboure, Y., Geraci, F., Pellegrini, M.: Extraction and Classification of Dense Implicit Communities in the Web Graph. ACM Transactions on the Web 3 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Moody, J., White, D.R.: Structural cohesion and embeddedness: A hierarchical concept of social groups. American Sociological Review 68, 103–127 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wellman, B.: The development of social network analysis: A study in the sociology of science. Contemporary Sociology-A Journal of Reviews 37, 221–222 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Barnes, E.R.: An Algorithm for Partitioning the Nodes of a Graph. Siam Journal on Algebraic and Discrete Methods 3, 541–550 (1982)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Doreian, P., Batagelj, V., Ferligoj, A.: Generalized blockmodeling of two-mode network data. Social Networks 26, 29–53 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Reichardt, J., Bornholdt, S.: Statistical mechanics of community detection. Physical Review E 74, 14 (2006)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Newman, M.E.J.: Finding community structure in networks using the eigenvectors of matrices. Physical Review E 74 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Karrer, B., Newman, M.E.J.: Stochastic blockmodels and community structure in networks. Physical Review E 83 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rosvall, M., Bergstrom, C.T.: An information-theoretic framework for resolving community structure in complex networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104, 7327–7331 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Barber, M.J.: Modularity and community detection in bipartite networks. Physical Review E 76 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Barber, M.J., Clark, J.W.: Detecting network communities by propagating labels under constraints. Physical Review E 80 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Newman, M.E.J., Girvan, M.: Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Physical Review E 69 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Clauset, A., Moore, C., Newman, M.E.J.: Hierarchical structure and the prediction of missing links in networks. Nature 453, 98–101 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Guimera, R., Sales-Pardo, M.: Missing and spurious interactions and the reconstruction of complex networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106, 22073–22078 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Karrer, B., Newman, M.E.J.: Stochastic blockmodels and community structure in networks. Physical Review E 83 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lancichinetti, A., Fortunato, S., Radicchi, F.: Benchmark graphs for testing community detection algorithms. Physical Review E 78 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Danon, L., Diaz-Guilera, A., Arenas, A.: The effect of size heterogeneity on community identification in complex networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics-Theory and Experiment (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lusseau, D., Schneider, K., Boisseau, O.J., Haase, P., Slooten, E., Dawson, S.M.: The bottlenose dolphin community of Doubtful Sound features a large proportion of long-lasting associations - Can geographic isolation explain this unique trait? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 54, 396–405 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zachary, W.W.: An information flow model for conflict and fission in small groups. Journal of Anthropological Research 33, 452–473 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Girvan, M., Newman, M.E.J.: Community structure in social and biological networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99, 7821–7826 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Adamic, L.A., Adar, E.: Friends and neighbors on the Web. Social Networks 25, 211–230 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Davis, B.B., Garder, M.R.: Deep South. University of Chicago Press, USA (1941)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Scott, J., Hughes, M.: The anatomy of Scottish capital: Scottish companies and Scottish capital. The anatomy of Scottish capital: Scottish companies and Scottish capital (1980)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pang, Y., Li, K. (2013). An Energy Model for Network Community Structure Detection. In: Motoda, H., Wu, Z., Cao, L., Zaiane, O., Yao, M., Wang, W. (eds) Advanced Data Mining and Applications. ADMA 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8346. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-53914-5_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-53914-5_35

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-53913-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-53914-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics