Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Allgemeine Psychologie pp 437–465Cite as

Worterkennung und -produktion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Zusammenfassung

Worterkennung und -produktion sind für das Verstehen, Planen und Produzieren geschriebener, gesprochener und gebärdeter Sprache unverzichtbare kognitive Prozesse. Die beteiligten Repräsentationen bilden semantische, syntaktische, morphologische und phonetisch-phonologische Eigenschaften ab. Dieses Kapitel bietet einen Überblick über unbeeinträchtigte und beeinträchtigte Worterkennung- und -produktion. Prozesse, Repräsentationen, Modelle sowie (erworbene) Störungen (Aphasien) der Sprachverarbeitung und -produktion und des Lesens und Verstehens geschriebener Wörter (Dyslexie) werden beschrieben.

Schlüsselwörter: Spracherkennung; Sprachproduktion; Sprachstörung (Aphasie); Wort; Mentales Lexikon (Wortgedächtnis); Konzept (Wortbedeutung); Lemma; Wortform; Morphem; Phonem; Worterkennung; Wortproduktion

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Acheson, D. J., & Hagoort, P. (2014). Twisting tongues to test for conflict-monitoring in speech production. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 1–16. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aguiar, V. de, Paolazzi, C. L., & Miceli, G. (2015). tDCS in post-stroke aphasia: The role of stimulation parameters, behavioral treatment and patient characteristics. Cortex, 63, 296–316. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2014.08.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aitchison, J. (1994). Words in the mind. An introduction to the mental lexicon (2. Aufl.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amsel, B. D., Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M. (2014). Empirically grounding grounded cognition: The case of color. NeuroImage, 99, 149–157. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.05.025.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bagley, W. C. (1900). The apperception of the spoken sentence: A study in the psychology of language. American Journal of Psychology, 12, 80–120. doi:10.2307/1412429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, H. (1929). Über das Elektrenkephalogramm des Menschen. Archiv für Psychiatrie, 87, 527–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkum, J. J. A. van, Brown, C. M., Zwitserlood, P., Kooijman, V., & Haggort, P. (2005). Anticipating Upcoming Words in Discourse: Evidence from ERPs and Reading Times. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 443–467. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.3.443.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berndt, R. S., & Mitchum, C. C. (Hrsg.). (1995). Cognitive neuropsychological approaches to the treatment of language disorders. Neuropsychological rehabilitation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bölte, J. (1997). The role of mismatching information in spoken word recognition. Hamburg: Dr. Kovaç.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bölte, J. (2001). Graded lexical activation by pseudowords in cross-modal semantic priming: Spreading of activation, backward priming, or repair? Proceedings Cognitive Science Meeting, Edinburgh, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bölte, J., & Coenen, E. (2002). Is phonological information mapped onto semantic information in a one-to-one manner? Brain and Language, 81, 384–397. doi:10.1006/brln.2001.2532.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Breitenstein, C., & Knecht, S. (2002). Development and validation of a language learning model for behavioral and functional-imaging studies. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 114, 173–179.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Breitenstein, C., Kamping, S., Jansen, A., Schomacher, M., & Knecht, S. (2004). Word learning can be achieved without feedback: implications for aphasia therapy. Restorative neurology and neuroscience, 22, 445–458.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Browman, C. P., & Goldstein, L. (1992). Articulatory phonology: An overview. Phonetica, 49, 155–180.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C., & Hagoort, P. (Hrsg.). (1999). The Neurocognition of Language. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bush, V. (1960). Science the endless frontier. Oxford, England: National Science Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butterworth, B. (1983). Lexical representation. In B. Butterworth (Hrsg.), Language production Bd. II New York, NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrd, D. (1992). Perception of assimilation in consonant clusters: A gestural model. Phonetica, 49, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cappa, S. F. (2011). The neural basis of aphasia rehabilitation: Evidence from neuroimaging and neurostimulation. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 21(5), 742–754. doi:10.1080/09602011.2011.614724.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Caramazza, A. (1997). How many levels of processing are there in lexical access? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, 177–208. doi:10.1080/026432997381664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carreiras, M., Perea, M., Vergara, M., & Pollatsek, A. (2009). The time course of orthography and phonology: ERP correlates of masked priming effects in Spanish. Psychophysiology, 46, 1113–1122. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00844.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, J. M. (1886). The time it takes to see and name objects. Mind, 1, 63–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1959). A review of B.F. Skinner’s verbal behavior. Language, 35, 26–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chrystal, D. (2010). The Cambridge Encyclopaedia of Language. Cambridge, UK: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chwilla, D., Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. (1998). The mechanism underlying backward priming in a lexical decision task: Spreading of activation versus semantic matching. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 15, 531–560. doi:10.1080/027249898391521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clahsen, H. (1999). Lexical entries and rules of language: A multidisciplinary study of German inflection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 991–1060.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coenen, E., Zwitserlood, P., & Bölte, J. (2001). Variation and assimilation in German: Consequences for lexical access and representation. Language and Cognitive Processes, 16, 535–564. doi:10.1080/01690960143000155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coltheart, M. (1978). Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In G. Underwood (Hrsg.), Strategies of information processing (S. 151–216). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coltheart, M. (1981). Disorders of reading and their implications for models of normal reading. Visible Language, 15, 245–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coltheart, M. (2013). Acquired dyslexia. In H. Pashler (Hrsg.), The Encyclopaedia of the Mind. New York: Sage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connine, C. M., Blasko, D. G., & Titone, D. (1993). Do the beginnings of spoken words have a special status in auditory word recognition? Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 193–210. doi:10.1006/jmla.1993.1011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornelissen, K., Laine, M., Tarkiainen, A., Järvensivu, T., Martin, N., & Salmelin, R. (2003). Adult brain plasticity elicited by anomia treatment. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15(3), 444–461. doi:10.1162/089892903321593153.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cree, G. S., McRae, K., & McNorgan, C. (1999). An attractor model of lexical conceptual processing: Simulating semantic priming. Cognitive Science, 23, 371–414. doi:10.1016/S0364-0213(99)00005-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, A., & Norris, D. (1988). The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 113–121. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.14.1.113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, A., Mehler, J., Norris, D., & Segui, J. (1986). The syllable’s differing role in the segmentation of French and English. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 385–400. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(86)90033-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutting, C. J., & Ferreira, V. S. (1999). Semantic and phonological information flow in the production lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 25, 318–344. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.25.2.318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daneman, M., & Reingold, E. (1995). What eye fixations tell us about phonological recoding during reading? In J. M. Henderson, M. Singer, & F. Ferreira (Hrsg.), Reading and language processing (S. 25–50). Mawah, NY: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dell, G. S., & O’Sheaghdha, P. G. (1992). Stages of lexical access in language production. Cognition, 42, 287–314. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(92)90046-K.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dell, G. S., Schwartz, M. F., Martin, N., Saffran, E. M., & Gagnon, D. A. (1997). Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers. Psychological Review, 104, 801–838. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.104.4.801.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dell, G. S., Nozari, N., & Oppenheim, G. M. (2014). Word production: Behavioral and computational considerations. In The Oxford Handbook of Language Production (S. 88–104). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra, T., & Kempen, G. (1993). Einführung in die Psycholinguistik. Bern: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drews, E., & Zwitserlood, P. (1995). Effects of morphological and orthographic similarity in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1098–1116.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Drews, E., Zwitserlood, P., Bolwiender, A., & Heuer, U. (1994). Lexikalische Repräsentation morphologischer Strukturen. In S. W. Felix, C. Habel, & G. Rickheit (Hrsg.), Kognitive Linguistik: Repräsentationen und Prozesse (S. 273–298). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag..

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dumay, N., Frauenfelder, U. H., & Content, A. (2002). The role of the syllable in lexical segmentation in French: Word-spotting data. Brain and Language, 81, 144–161. doi:10.1006/brln.2001.2513.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eddington, C. M., & Tokowicz, N. (2014). How meaning similarity influences ambiguous word processing: The current state of the literature. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 13–37. doi:10.3758/s13423-014-0665-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elman, & McClelland, J. L. (1986). Exploiting lawful variability in the speech wave. In J. S. Perkell, & D. H. Klatt (Hrsg.), Invariance and variability in Speech perception (S. 360–385). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, L. B., & Fowler, C. A. (1987). The inflectional noun system in Serbo-Croatian: Lexical representation of morphological structure. Memory & Cognition, 15, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleischer, W. (1982). Wortbildung der deutschen Sprache. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. A. (1983). The modularity of the mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forster, K. I. (1979). Levels of processing and the structure of the language processor. In W. E. Cooper, & E. C. T. Walker (Hrsg.), Sentence processing: Psycholinguistic studies presented to Merill Garrett (S. 27–85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foss, D. J., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (1983). Cracking the dual code: Toward a unitary model of phoneme identification. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 609–632. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(83)90365-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Frauenfelder, U. H., & Peeters, G. (1998). Simulating the time course of spoken word recognition. In J. Grainger, & A. M. Jacobs (Hrsg.), Localist connectionist approaches to human cognition (S. 101–146). London, UK: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friederici, A. D. (1999). The neurobiology of language processing. In A. D. Friederici (Hrsg.), Language comprehension: A biological perspective (S. 265–304). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Friederici, A. D. (2011). The Brain Basis of Language Processing: From Structure to Function. Physiological Reviews, 91, 1357–1392. doi:10.1152/physrev.00006.2011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fromkin, V. A. (1971). The non-anomalous nature of anomalous utterances. Language, 47, 27–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frost, R., Katz, L., & Bentin, S. (1987). Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographical depth: A multilingual comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 104–115. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.13.1.104.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ganong, W. F. (1980). Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6, 110–115. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.6.1.110.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garnsey, S. M. (Ed.) (1993). Event-related brain potentials in the study of language: An introduction. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 337–640. doi:10.1080/01690969308407581

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, M. F. (1988). Processes in language production. In F. J. Newmeyer (Hrsg.), Linguistcs: The Cambridge Survey: III. Language: Psychological and biological aspects (S. 69–96). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaskell, M. G. (2003). Modelling regressive and progressive effects of assimilation in speech perception. Journal of Phonetics, 31, 447–463. doi:10.1016/S0095-4470(03)00012-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaskell, M. G., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1996). Phonological variation and inference in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 144–158. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.22.1.144.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gaskell, M. G., Hare, M., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1995). A connectionist model of phonological representation in speech perception. Cognitive Science, 19, 407–439. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1904_1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gollan, T. H., & Kroll, J. F. (2001). Bilingual lexical access. In B. Rapp (Hrsg.), The Handbook of Cognitive Neuropsychology. What deficits reveal about the human mind (S. 321–345). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosjean, F. & Frauenfelder, U. H. (Eds.). (1997). A guide to spoken word recognition paradigms. Language and Cognitive Processes, 6, 553–699.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosjean, F., & Li, P. (2013). The Psycholinguistics of Bilingualism. Malden, MA & Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gumnior, H., Bölte, J., & Zwitserlood, P. (2005). Assimilation in existing and novel German compounds. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20, 465–488. doi:10.1080/01690960444002174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagoort, P. (2003). Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 883–899. doi:10.1162/089892903322370807.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hartsuiker, R. J., Jong, N. H. de, & Pickering, M. J. (2005). Semantic and Phonological Context Effects in Speech Error Repair. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 921–932. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.5.921.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heuven, W. J. B. van, Dijkstra, T., & Grainger, J. (1998). Orthographic neighborhood effects in bilingual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 458–483. doi:10.1006/jmla.1998.2584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hickok, G., & Poeppel, D. (2007). The cortical organization of speech perception. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8, 393–402. doi:10.1038/nrn2113.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huey, E. B. (1990). On the psychology and physiology of reading. The American Journal of Psychology, 11, 283–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Indefrey, P. (2011). The Spatial and Temporal Signatures of Word Production Components: A Critical Update. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 1–16. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Indefrey, P., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2004). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition, 92, 101–144. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2002.06.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jescheniak, J., & Schriefers, H. (1997). Lexical access in speech production: Serial or cascaded processing? Language and Cognitive processes, 12, 847–852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klatt, D. H. (1979). Speech perception. A model of acoustic-phonetic analysis and lexical access. In R. A. Cole (Hrsg.), Perception and production of fluent speech (S. 243–288). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klatt, D. H. (1986). The problem of variability in speech recognition and in models of speech perception. In J. Perkell, & D. Klatt (Hrsg.), Invariance and variability in speech processes (S. 300–319). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, B., & Whishaw, I. Q. (1996). Neuropsychologie. Heidelberg: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosslyn, S. M. (1994). On cognitive neuroscience. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6, 297–303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kroll, J. F., & Stewart, E. (1994). Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 149–174. doi:10.1006/jmla.1994.1008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krott, A., & Lebib, R. (2013). Electrophysiological evidence for a neural substrate of morphological rule application in correct wordforms. Brain Research, 1496, 70–83. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2012.12.012.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhl, P. K. (1991). Human adults and human infants show a „perceptual magnet effect“ for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 93–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutas, M., & DeLong, K. A. A. (2008). Sampler of Event-Related Brain Potential (ERP) Analyses of Language Processing. In Z. Breznitz (Hrsg.), Brain Research in Language (S. 153–186). New York, NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kutas, M., Federmeier, K. D., & Urbach, T. (2014). The „negatives“ and „positives“ of prediction in language. In M. S. Gazzaniga, & G. R. Mangun (Hrsg.), The Cognitive Neurosciences (5. Aufl. S. 649–656). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Heij, W. (1988). Components of Stroop-like interference in picture naming. Memory & Cognition, 16(5), 400–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahiri, A., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1991). The mental representation of lexical form: A phonological approach to the recognition lexicon. Cognition, 38, 245–294.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lahiri, A., & Reetz, H. (2002). Underspecified recognition. In C. Gussenhoven, & N. Werner (Hrsg.), Laboratory Phonology VII (S. 637–675). Berlin: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leinenger, M. (2014). Phonological coding during reading. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1534–1555. doi:10.1037/a0037830.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Leuninger, H. (1993). Reden ist Schweigen, Silber ist Gold. Gesammelte Versprecher. Zürich: Ammann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levelt, W. J. M. (2013). A history of psycholinguistics: The pre-Chomskyan era. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levelt, W. J. M., Schriefers, H., Vorberg, D., Meyer, A., Pechmann, T., & Havinga, J. (1991). The time course of lexical access in speech production: A study of picture naming. Psychological Review, 98, 122–142. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.98.1.122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levelt, W. J. M., Praamstra, P., Meyer, A. S., Helenius, P., & Salmelin, R. (1998). A MEG study of picture naming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 553–567. doi:10.1162/089892998562960.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1–75. doi:10.1017/S0140525X99001776.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, A. M., & Mattingly, I. G. (1986). The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition, 21, 2–36. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(85)90021-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lüttmann, H., Zwitserlood, P., Böhl, A., & Bölte, J. (2011). Evidence for morphological composition at the form level in speech production. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23(7), 818–836. doi:10.1080/20445911.2011.575774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word recognition. Cognition, 25, 71–102. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(87)90005-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1993). Issues of process and representation in lexical access. In G. Altmann, & R. Shillcock (Hrsg.), Cognitive models of speech processing: The second Sperlonga meeting (S. 187–210). Hove: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Zwitserlood, P. (1989). Accessing spoken words: The importance of word onsets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 576–585. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.15.3.576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Tyler, L. K., Waksler, R., & Older, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101, 3–33. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.101.1.3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Moss, H. E., & Halen, S. van (1996). Perceptual distance and competition in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1376–1392. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.22.6.1376.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, A., & Orth, J. (1901). Zur qualitativen Untersuchung der Association. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 26, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, & Elman, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1–86. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(86)90015-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McMurray, B., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Aslin, R. N. (2002). Gradient effects of within-category phonetic variation on lexical access. Cognition, 86, B33–B42. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00157-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, A. S., & Schriefers, H. (1991). Phonological facilitation in picture-word interference experiments: Effects of stimulus-onset asynchrony and types of interfering stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 1146–1160. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.17.6.1146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A. (1993). Wörter. Streifzüge durch die Psycholinguistik. Heidelberg: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A., Heise, G. A., & Lichten, W. (1951). The intelligibility of speech as a function of the context and the test materials. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41, 329–335.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moss, H. E., McCormick, S. F., & Tyler, L. K. (1997). The time course of activation of semantic information of spoken word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 695–731. doi:10.1080/016909697386664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neely, J. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In D. Besner, & G. W. Humphreys (Hrsg.), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (S. 264–336). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, R., Jared, D., & Haigh, C. A. (2012). Does phonology play a role when skilled readers read high-frequency words? Evidence from ERPs. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27, 1361–1384. doi:10.1080/01690965.2011.603932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nickels, L. (Hrsg.). (1997). Spoken word production and its breakdown in aphasia. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble, C. E., & McNeely, D. A. (1957). The role of meaningfulness (m) in paired-associate learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 16–22. doi:10.1037/h0041215.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, D. (1994). Shortlist: A connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition, 52, 189–234. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(94)90043-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, D., McQueen, J., Cutler, A., & Butterfield, S. (1997). The possible-word constraint in the segmentation of continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 34, 191–243. doi:10.1006/cogp.1997.0671.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, D., McQueen, J., & Cutler, A. (2000). Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is not necessary. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 299–370. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00003241.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1958). The measurement of meaning. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paap, K. R., Newsome, S. L., McDonald, J. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1982). An activation-verification model for letter and word recognition: The word superiority effect. Psychological Review, 89, 573–594. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.89.5.573.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Penfield, W., & Roberts, L. (1959). Speech and brain mechanisms. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peuser, G. (1978). Aphasie.Eine Einführung in die Patholinguistik. München: Fink.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piai, V., Roelofs, A., & Schriefers, H. (2011). Semantic interference in immediate and delayed naming and reading: Attention and task decisions. Journal of Memory and Language, 64(4), 404–423. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2011.01.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct. New York, NY: Morrow.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S. (1999). Words and Rules. New York: Basic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pisoni, D. B., & Luce, P. A. (1987). Acoustic-phonetic representations in word recognition. Cognition, 25, 21–52. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(87)90003-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Plaut, D. C. (1999). A connectionist approach to word reading and acquired dyslexia: Extension to sequential processing. Cognitive Science, 23, 543–568. doi:10.1016/S0364-0213(99)00015-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potter, M. C., So, K.-F., Eckhardt, B. von, & Feldman, L. B. (1984). Lexical and conceptual representation in beginning and more proficient bilinguals. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 23–38. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(84)90489-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pulvermüller, F., & Fadiga, L. (2010). Active perception: Sensorimotor circuits as a cortical basis for language. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(5), 351–360. doi:10.1038/nrn2811.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Repp, B. H. (1984). Categorical perception: Issues, methods, findings. In N. J. Lass (Hrsg.), Speech and Language: Advances in basic research and practice (S. 243–335). New York, NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Repp, B. H., & Liberman, A. M. (1987). Phonetic category boundaries are flexible. In S. Harnad (Hrsg.), Categorical perception (S. 89–112). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roelofs, A. (1992). A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking. Cognition, 42, 107–142. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(92)90041-F.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Salmelin, R. (2007). Clinical neurophysiology of language: The MEG approach. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118, 237–254. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2006.07.316.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Samuel, A. (1996). Does lexical information influence the perceptual restoration of phonemes? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 28–51. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.125.1.28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saussure, F. de (1960). Cours de linguistique generale. In C. Bally, & A. Sechehaye (Hrsg.), Course in general linguistics (S. 25–50). London, UK: Owen. Übersetzung: W. Baskin; Original veröffentlicht 1916

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer, B., Fricke, S., Szczerbinski, M., Fox-Boyer, A. V., Stackhouse, J., & Wells, B. (2009). Development of a test battery for assessing phonological awareness in German-speaking children. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 23(6), 404–430. doi: 10.1080/02699200902770187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreuder, R., & Baayen, H. (1995). Modelling morphological processing. In L. B. Feldman (Hrsg.), Morphological aspects of language processing (S. 131–154). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schriefers, H., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, P. (1990). Exploring the time course of lexical access in speech production: Picture-word interference studies. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 86–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sebastian-Gallés, N., Dupoux, E., Segui, J., & Mehler, J. (1992). Contrasting syllabic effects in Catalan and Spanish. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 18–32. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(92)90003-G.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidenberg, M., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523–568. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.523.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sejnowski, T. J., & Churchland, P. S. (1989). Brain and cognition. In M. I. Posner (Hrsg.), Foundations of cognitive science (S. 301–358). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shallice, T., Warrington, E. K., & McCarthy, R. (1983). Reading without semantics. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35(A), 112–138. doi:10.1080/14640748308402120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Croft.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smolka, E., Zwitserlood, P., & Rösler, F. (2007). Stem access in regular and irregular inflection: Evidence from German participles. Journal of Memory and Language, 57(3), 325–347. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.04.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starreveld, P. A., & La Heij, W. (1995). Semantic interference, orthographic facilitation, and their interaction in naming tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(3), 686.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinney, D. A. (1979). Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 645–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabossi, A. (1998). Accessing lexical ambiguity in different types of sentential context. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 324–340. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(88)90058-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taft, M. (1985). Lexical access codes in visual and auditory word recognition. Language & Cognitive Processes, 1, 297–308. doi:10.1080/01690968608404679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turennout, M. van, Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (1998). Brain activity during speaking: From syntax to phonology in 40 ms. Science, 280, 787–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verplank, W. S. (1955). The control of the content of conversation: Reinforcement of statements of opinion. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 668–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wahrig, G. (2012). Deutsches Wörterbuch (9. Aufl.). Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Lexikon Verlag. Wahrig-Burfeind (Hrsg.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zatorre, R. J., Meyer, E., Gjedde, A., & Evans, A. C. (1996). PET studies of phonetic processing of speech: Review, replication, and reanalysis. In M. Raichle, & P. S. Goldman-Rakic (Hrsg.), Special issue: Cortical imaging – microscope of the mind, Cerebral Cortex (Bd. 6, S. 21–30).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwitserlood, P. (1989). The locus of the effects of sentential-semantic context in spoken word processing. Cognition, 32, 25–64. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(89)90013-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zwitserlood, P. (1994a). The role of semantic transparency in the processing and representation of Dutch compounds. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 341–368. doi:10.1080/01690969408402123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwitserlood, P. (1994b). Access to phonological form representations in language comprehension and production. In C. Clifton, L. Frazier, & K. Rayner (Hrsg.), Perspectives on sentence processing (S. 83–106). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwitserlood, P. (1999). Gesprochene Wörter im Satzkontext. In A. D. Friederici (Hrsg.), Sprachrezeption. Enzyklopädie der Psychologie, Themenbereich C, Serie 3 Bd. 2 Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwitserlood, P. (2004). Sublexical and morphological information in speech processing. Brain and Language, 90, 368–377. doi:10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00448-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zwitserlood, P., Schriefers, H., Lahiri, A., & Donselaar, W. van (1993). The role of syllables in the perception of spoken Dutch. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 260–271. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.19.2.260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwitserlood, P., Bölte, J., & Dohmes, P. (2000). Morphological effects on speech production: Evidence from picture naming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 563–591. doi:10.1080/01690960050119706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwitserlood, P., Bölte, J., & Dohmes, P. (2002). Where and how morphologically complex words interplay with naming pictures. Brain and Language, 81, 358–367. doi:10.1006/brln.2001.2530.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Psychologie, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Fliednerstr. 21, 48149, Münster, Deutschland

    Prof. Dr. Pienie Zwitserlood & Prof. Dr. Jens Bölte

Authors
  1. Prof. Dr. Pienie Zwitserlood
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Prof. Dr. Jens Bölte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pienie Zwitserlood .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Psychologie, RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany

    Jochen Müsseler

  2. UMIT – Private Universität für Gesundheitswissenschaften, Medizinische Informatik und Technik, Institut für Psychologie, Hall in Tirol, Austria

    Martina Rieger

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zwitserlood, P., Bölte, J. (2017). Worterkennung und -produktion. In: Müsseler, J., Rieger, M. (eds) Allgemeine Psychologie. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-53898-8_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-53898-8_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-53897-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-53898-8

  • eBook Packages: Psychology (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation