Skip to main content

Normal Contact Problems with Axially-Symmetric Bodies Without Adhesion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Method of Dimensionality Reduction in Contact Mechanics and Friction
  • 1733 Accesses

Abstract

The method of dimensionality reduction (MDR) is based on the observation that certain types of three-dimensional contacts can be exactly mapped to one-dimensional linearly elastic foundations. The MDR consists essentially of two simple steps: (a) substitution of the three-dimensional continuum by a uniquely defined one-dimensional linearly elastic or viscoelastic foundation (Winkler foundation) and (b) transformation of the three-dimensional profile of the contacting bodies by means of the MDR-transformation. As soon as these two steps are done, the contact problem can be considered to be solved. For axially-symmetric contacts, only a small calculation by hand is required which not exceed elementary calculus and will not be a barrier for any practically-oriented engineer. In spite of its simplicity, all results are exact. The present chapter describes the basic ideas of MDR in its application to normal contacts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This result can be found in any book dealing with contact mechanics (see, for example [1]).

  2. 2.

    Strictly speaking, a parabolic profile with the radius of curvature R is considered.

  3. 3.

    German–Russian Workshop “Numerical simulation methods in tribology: possibilities and limitations”, Berlin University of Technology, March 14–17, 2005. Published in [2].

  4. 4.

    Let it be pointed out here that, as in the introductory examples, a one-dimensional profile is generally denoted with \( g\left( x \right) \) and a three-dimensional profile with \( f\left( r \right) \). Both are defined as being positive from the tip of the indenter upwards, which is additionally introduced as the coordinate \( \tilde{z} \) (see Fig. 3.4).

  5. 5.

    For self-affinity, the following property is understood: If the profile (3.14) is stretched in the horizontal direction by the factor \( C \) and simultaneously in the vertical direction by a factor \( C^{n} \), then one obtains the original profile. The exponent \( n \) is known as the Hurst exponent.

  6. 6.

    Frequently, the one-dimensional profile is referred to in the following; this is to be understood, of course, as the profile in the one-dimensional model.

References

  1. K.L. Johnson, Contact Mechanics, Nachdruck der 1. Auflage (s.l.: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001), p. 6

    Google Scholar 

  2. V.L. Popov, S.G. Psakhie, Numerical simulation methods in tribology. Tribol. Int. 40(6), 916–923 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Heß, Über die exakte Abbildung ausgewählter dreidimensionaler Kontakte auf Systeme mit niedrigerer räumlicher Dimension (Cuvillier, Berlin, 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. G.M. Pharr, W.C. Oliver, F.R. Brotzen, On the generality of the relationship among contact stiffness, contact area, and elastic modulus during indentation. J. Mater. Res. 7(3), 613–617 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. V.L. Popov, Contact Mechanics and Friction. Physical Principles and Applications (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg 2010), pp. 69–70.

    Google Scholar 

  6. U.B.C.O. Ejike, The stress on an elastic half-space due to sectionally smooth-ended punch. J. Elast. 11(4), 395–402 (1981)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. R.B. King, Elastic analysis of some punch problems for a layered medium. Int. J. Solids Struct. 23(12), 1657–1664 (1987)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. A.E.H. Love, Boussinesq’s problem for a rigid cone. Q. J. Math. 10, 161–175 (1939)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. J.R. Barber, Indentation of the semi-infinite elastic solid by a concave rigid punch. J. Elast. 6(2), 149–159 (1976)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. H.Y.A. Yu, Concise treatment of indentation problems in transversely isotropic half-spaces. Int. J. Solids Struct. 38(10), 2213–2232 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. C.M. Segedin, The relation between load and penetration for a spherical punch. Mathematika 4, 156–161 (1957)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Valentin L. Popov .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Popov, V.L., Heß, M. (2015). Normal Contact Problems with Axially-Symmetric Bodies Without Adhesion. In: Method of Dimensionality Reduction in Contact Mechanics and Friction. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-53876-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-53876-6_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-53875-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-53876-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics