Skip to main content

Abstract

In addition to the strict geometrically defined cases that were mapped in Chap. 3 with the method of dimensionality reduction, we would now like to devote ourselves to the question of whether rough surfaces can also be handled with the reduction method. The importance of surface roughness for tribological processes was already emphasized by Bowden and Tabor in the 1940s and since that time has become generally accepted. The most important fundamental work dealing with the contact mechanics of rough surfaces was conducted in the 1950s by Archard and in the 1960s by Greenwood and Williamson. However, the contact mechanics of rough surfaces remains even today a current and to some extent, controversial topic. In this chapter, we will show that there exist theoretical as well as the empirical reasons for why the method of dimensionality reduction is also able to be applied to randomly rough surfaces. In this way, the method presents itself as a practical tool for the fast calculation of contact problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    As can be seen in the further considerations, this relationship between the Hurst exponent and the form of the power spectrum is valid over an even larger interval: \( 0 < H < 2 \).

  2. 2.

    We will later see that the interactions between the asperities play no role in the method of dimensionality reduction: The only property that is required is the self-affinity of the surface, regardless of whether the profile is regular or randomly rough.

  3. 3.

    It was only after the appearance of paper [8] and of the German edition of this book, the authors were called attention to the fact that dependencies (10.27) an (10.33) have been derived already in 1993 in [9] using almost the same arguments.

References

  1. F.P. Bowden, D. Tabor, The Friction and Lubrication of Solids (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1986)

    Google Scholar 

  2. J.F. Archard, Elastic deformation and the laws of friction. Proc. R. Soc. A 243, 190 (1957)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. J. Greenwood, J. Williamson, Contact of nominally flat surfaces. Proc. R. Soc. Bd. A295, 300 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  4. B.N.J. Persson, Contact mechanics for randomly rough surfaces. Surf. Sci. Rep. 61, 201 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. T. Geike, Theoretische Grundlagen eines schnellen Berechnungsverfahrens für den Kontakt rauer Oberflächen (Techn. Univ., Diss, Berlin, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. Pohrt, V.L. Popov, Normal contact stiffness of elastic solids with fractal rough surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108(4), 104301 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. V.L. Popov, Kontaktmechanik und Reibung, Von der Nanotribologie bis zur Erdbebendynamik. 2., überarbeitete Auflage (Springer, Berlin, 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Pohrt, V.L. Popov, A.E. Filippov, Normal contact stiffness of elastic solids with fractal rough surfaces for one- and three-dimensional systems. Phys. Rev. E. 86, 026710 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. Roux, J. Schmittbuhl, J.-P. Vilotte, A. Hansen, Some physical properties of self-affine rough surfaces. Europhys. Lett. 23(4), 277–282 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. I.N. Sneddon, The relation between load and penetration in the axisymmetric boussinesq problem for a punch of arbitrary profile. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 3, 47–57 (1965)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. J. Barber, Bounds on the electrical resistance between contacting elastic rough bodies. Proc. R. Soc. London A495, 53–60 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. R. Pohrt, V.L. Popov, Contact mechanics of rough spheres: crossover from fractal to hertzian behavior. Adv. Tribol. 2013, 974178 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Valentin L. Popov .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pohrt, R., Popov, V.L., Heß, M. (2015). Normal Contact of Rough Surfaces. In: Method of Dimensionality Reduction in Contact Mechanics and Friction. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-53876-6_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-53876-6_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-53875-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-53876-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics