Advertisement

Bridging the Gap between Rich Supply Chain Problems and the Effective Application of Metaheuristics through Ontology-Based Modeling

  • Corinna Engelhardt-Nowitzki
  • Stefan Rotter
  • Michael Affenzeller
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8111)

Abstract

Supply chains (SC) are exposed to dynamic markets and enlarged network structures. This induces abundant decision complexity and the need to frequently adapt decisions. Metaheuristics are most suitable for rich SC optimization problems. However, effectiveness and adaptability of these approaches are impaired through extensive modeling efforts and intricate data representation issues. Therefore we propose using ontological modeling to mitigate these disadvantages.

Keywords

Supply Chain Optimization Metaheuristics Supply Chain Ontology 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Benyoucef, L., Jain, V.: Editorial note for the special issue on ‘Artificial Intelligence Techniques for Supply Chain Management’. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 22(6), 829–831 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mirzapour Al-e-hashem, S.M.J., Malekly, H., Aryanezhad, M.B.: A multi-objective robust optimization model for multi-product multi-site aggregate production planning in a supply chain under uncertainty. International Journal of Production Economics 134(1), 28–42 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schmid, V., Doerner, K.F., Laporte, G.: Rich routing problems arising in supply chain management. European Journal of OR 224(3), 435–448 (2013)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Affenzeller, M., et al.: Genetic Algrothims and Genetic Programming - Modern Concepts and Practical Applications. CRC Taylor & Francis Group (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Arthofer, K., et al.: Servicing Individual Product Variants within Value Chains with an Ontology. In: Modelling Value. Selected Papers of the 1st International Conference on Value Chain Management, pp. 333–354 (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gruber, T.R.: A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition 5(2), 199–220 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Williamson, O.E.: The economic institutions of capitalism. Firms, markets, relational contracting. Free Press, Collier Macmillan, New York, London (1985)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bendoly, E., et al.: Bodies of Knowledge for Research in Behavioral Operations. Production & Operations Management 19(4), 434–452 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Studer, R., Fensel, D.: Knowledge engineering: Principles and methods. Data & Knowledge Engineering 25(1-2), 161–197 (1998)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Grubic, T., Fan, I.-S.: Supply Chain Ontology: Review, analysis and synthesis. Computers in Industry 61(8), 776–786 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Swartout, B., et al.: Toward Distributed Use of Large-Scale Ontologies. In: AAAI 1997 Spring Symposium on Ontological Engineering, Stanford University, CA, USA, pp. 138–148 (1997)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hillier, F.S., Lieberman, G.: Introduction to Operations Research. McGraw-Hill International Edition, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ahlert, K.-H., Corsten, H., Gössinger, R.: Capacity management in order-driven production networks - A flexibility-oriented approach to determine the size of a network capacity pool. Int. Journal of Production Economics 118(2), 430–441 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lee, J., et al.: Design of product ontology architecture for collaborative enterprises. Expert Systems with Applications 36(2), 2300–2309 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Brock, D.L., et al.: An Introduction to semantic modeling for logistical systems. Journal of Business Logistics 26(2), 97–117 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chi, Y.-L.: Rule-based ontological knowledge base for monitoring partners across supply networks. Expert Systems with Applications 37(2), 1400–1407 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Horridge, M., et al.: A Practical Guide to Building OWL Ontologies using the Protege-OWL Plugin and CO-ODE Tools Edition 1.0 (2004)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lacy, L.W.: Owl: Representing Information Using the Web Ontology Language. Trafford Publishing, Victoria (2005)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Prud’hommeaux, E., Seaborne, A.: SPARQL Query Language for RDF (2008)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Latha Shankar, B., et al.: Location and allocation decisions for multi-echelon supply chain network - A multi-objective evolutionary approach. Expert Systems with Applications 40(2), 551–562 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rotter, S.: Supply Chain Network Design - A Facility Location and Allocation Model for Biomass-based Energy Carrier Production in Upper Austria (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Corinna Engelhardt-Nowitzki
    • 1
  • Stefan Rotter
    • 1
  • Michael Affenzeller
    • 2
  1. 1.Upper Austria University of Applied SciencesSteyrAustria
  2. 2.Upper Austria University of Applied SciencesHagenbergAustria

Personalised recommendations