Skip to main content

Risikostratifikation anhand präoperativer Parameter in der Erwachsenen-Herzchirurgie

  • Conference paper
Dokumentationsverfahren in der Herzchirurgie II
  • 23 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Die richtige präoperative Einschätzung des Schweregrades der Erkrankung eines Patienten ist für die Behandlung und weitere Prognose von großer Bedeutung. Wünschenswert ist zu diesem Zweck eine wissenschaftlich fundierte Methode, deren Standardisierung und Reproduzierbarkeit über die subjektive Beurteilung des behandelnden Arztes hinausgeht. Auch für die interne und externe Qualitätssicherung ist die Stratifizierung von Patienten nach ihrem präoperativen Zustand unerläßlich, da ansonsten ein aussagefähiger Vergleich erheblich erschwert wird. Gleiches gilt auch für die Bearbeitung wissenschaftlicher Fragestellungen, wo Vergleiche zwischen Patientengruppen nur unter Berücksichtigung des präoperativen Schweregrades sinnvoll sind. Auch zur effizienten Planung des OP-Betriebes ist die korrekte Einschätzung der zu erwartenden Mortalität und Morbidität von großer Bedeutung. Nur so ist eine angemessene Terminierung des Eingriffes möglich, um z.B. einen Stau auf der Intensivstation zu vermeiden. Schließlich kann und muß auch zur leistungsgerechten Patientenabrechnung die zu erwartende Komplikationshäufigkeit bestimmter Patientenkollektive für die Zuteilung von Ressourcen herangezogen werden.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Bickell NA, Pieper KS, Lee KL, Mark DB, Glower DD, Pryor DB, Califf RM (1992) Referral patterns for coronary artery disease treatment: gender bias or good clinical judgement? Ann Int Med 116; 791–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Christakis GT, Weisel RD, Buth KJ, Fremes SE, Rao V, Panagiotopoulos KP, Ivanov J, Goldman BS, David TE (1995) Is body size the cause for poor outcomes of coronary artery bypass operations in women? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 110: 1344–58

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Douglas JS, King SB, Jones EL, Craver JM, Bradford JM, Hatcher CR (1 981) Reduced efficacy of coronary bypass surgery in women. Circulation 64 (Suppl II ): II - 6

    Google Scholar 

  4. Edwards FH, Clark RE, Schwartz M: Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (1994) The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database experience. Ann Thorac Surg 57: 12–9

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fernandez J, Laub GW, Adkins MS, Andereon WA, Chen C, Bailey BM, Nealon LM, McGrath LB (1994) Early and late-phase events after valve replacement with the St. Jude Medical prosthesis in 1,200 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 107 (2): 394–406

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fisher LD, Kennedy JW, Davis KB, Maynard C, Fritz JK, Kaiser G, Myers WO, and the Participating CASS Clinics (1982) Association of sex, physical size, and operative mortality after coronary artery bypass in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study ( CASS ). J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 84: 334–41

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fremes SE, Goldman BS, Ivanov J, Weisel RD, David TE, Salerno T (1989) Valvular surgery in the elderly. Circulation 80: I77–90

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gardner TJ, Horneffer PJ, Bott VL, Watkins L, Baumgartner WA, Borkon AM, Reitz BA (1985) Coronary artery bypass grafting in women. Ann Surg 201: 780–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hammermeister KE, Burchfiel C, Johnson R, Grover FL (1990) Identification of patients at greatest risk for developing major complications at cardiac surgery. Circulation 82: IV - 380

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hannan EL, Kilburn H, O’Donnell JF, Lukacik G, Shields EP (1990) Adult open heart surgery in New York State. JAMA 264: 2768–74

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. I. He GW, Acuff TE, Ryan WH, Douthit MB, Bowman RT, He YH, Mack MJ (1994) Aortic valve replacement: determinants of operative mortality. Ann Thorac Surg 57 (5): 1140–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Holper K, Federkiel H, Hoelzel D, Sebening F (1987) Estimation of the operative risk of mitral valve replacement by multivariate logistic regression analysis. Thorac Cardiovasc Surgeon 35: 33–41

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Higgins TL, Estafanous FG, Loop FD, Beck GJ, Blum JM, Paranandi L (1992) Stratification of morbidity and mortality outcome by preoperative risk factors in coronary artery bypass patients: a clinical severity score. JAMA 267: 2344–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Katz NM, Ahmed SW, Clatk BK, Wallace RB (1988) Predictors of length of hospitalization after cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 45 (6): 656–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kennedy JW, Kaiser GC, Lloyd DF, Maynard C, Fritz JK (1980) Multivariate discriminant analysis of the clinical and angiographic predictors of the operative mortality from the Collaborative Study in Coronary Artery Surgery ( CASS ). J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 80: 876–87

    Google Scholar 

  16. Khan S, Nessim S, Gray R, Czer LS, Chanx A, Matloff T (1990) Increased mortality of women in coronary artery bypass surgery: evidence for referral bias. Ann Intern Med 112: 561–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. King KB, Clark PC, Hicks GL Jr (1992) Patterns of referral and recovery in women and men undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Am J Cardiol 69: 179–82

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kouchoukos NT, Obermann A, Kirklin JW, Russel RO, Karp RB (1980) Coronary bypass surgery: analysis of factors affecting hospital mortality. Circulation 62 (Suppl I): 84–9

    Google Scholar 

  19. Krumholz HM, Douglas PS, Lauer MS, Pasternak RC (1992) Selection of patients for coronary angiography and coronary revascularization early after myocardial infarction: is there evidence for a gender bias? Ann Int Med 116: 785–90

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM, Taylor PC, Gill CC, Goormastic M, Golding LR, Strewart RW, Loop FD (1986) Reoperations for valve surgery: perioperative mortality and determinants of risk for 1,000 patients, 1958–1984. Ann Thorac Surg 42 (6): 632–43

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Nair CK, Biddle WP, Kaneshige A, Cook C, Ryschon K, Sketch MH Sr (1992) Ten-year experience with mitral valve replacement in the elderly. Am Heart J 124 (1): 154–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Naunheim KS, Swartz MT, Pennington DG, Fiore AC, McBride LR, Peigh PS, Barnett MG, Vaca KJ (1992) Intraaortic balloon pumping in patients requiring cardiac operations. Risk analysis and longterm follow-op. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 104 (6): 1654–60

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Naylor CD, Levinton CM (1993) Sex-related differences in coronary revascularisation practices: the perspective from a Canadia queue management project. Can Med Assoc 149: 449–59

    Google Scholar 

  24. O’Connor GT, Plume SK, Olmstead EM, Coffin LH, Morton JR, Maloney CT, Nowicki ER, Levy DG, Tryzelaar JF, Hernandez F, Adrian L, Casey KJ, Bundy D, Soule DN, Marrin CAS, Nugent W, Charlesworth DC, Clough R, Katz S, Leavitt BJ, Wennberg JE (1992) Multivariate prediction of in-hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Circulation 85: 2110–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. O’Connor GT, Morton JR, Diehl MJ, Olmstead EM, Coffin LH, Levy DG, Maloney CT, Plume SK, Nugent W, Malenka DJ, Hernandez F, Clough R, Birkmeyer J, Marrin CAS, Leavitt BJ (1993) Differences between men and women in hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Circulation 88: 2104–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Orsinelli DA, Aurigemma GP, Battista S, Krendel S, Gaasch WH (1993) Left ventricular hypertrophy and mortality after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis. A high risk subgroup identified by preoperative relative wall thickness. J Am Coll Cardiol 22 (6): 1679–83

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Parsonnet V, Dean D, Bernstein AD (1989) A method of uniform stratification of risk for evaluation the results of surgery in acquired adult heart disease. Circulation 79 (Suppl I): 3–12

    Google Scholar 

  28. Richardson JV, Cyrus R (1986) Reduced efficacy of coronary artery bypass grafting in women. Ann Thorac Surg 42 (Suppl): s16 - s22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Tobin JN, Wassertheil-Smoller S, Wexler JP, Steingart RM, Budner N, Lense L, Wachspress J (1987) Sex bias in considering coronary bypass surgery. Ann Intern Med 107: 19–25

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Tyras DH, Barner HB, Kaiser GC, Codd JE, Laks H, Willman VL (1978) Myocardial revascularization in women. Ann Thorac Surg 25: 449–53

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Haehnel, J.C., Weipert, J., Barankay, A., Wottke, M., Meisner, H. (1997). Risikostratifikation anhand präoperativer Parameter in der Erwachsenen-Herzchirurgie. In: Krian, A., Scheld, H.H. (eds) Dokumentationsverfahren in der Herzchirurgie II. Steinkopff, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-53772-1_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-53772-1_16

  • Publisher Name: Steinkopff, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-53773-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-53772-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics