Skip to main content

References

  • Chapter
  • 34 Accesses

Part of the book series: Technology, Innovation and Policy ((3217,volume 7))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aigner, H.; Barisitz, St.; Fink, G. (1993): Unternehmensbewertung in Osteuropa. Methoden und Fallstudien. Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Albach, H.; Witt, P. (Hg.) (1993): Transformationsprozesse in ehemals volkseigenen Betrieben. Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Antalóczy, K. (1996): Nagyvdllalatok a gyógyszeriparban ( Large firms in the pharmaceutical industry ), Pénzügykutató Rt, mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Apolte, Th. (1992): Politische Ökonomie der Systemtransformation. Gruppeninteressen und Interessenkonflikte im Transformationsprozeß. Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Arbeitsgemeinschaft deutscher wirtschaftswissenschaftlicher Forschungsinstitute (1990): Fragen zur Reform der DDR - Wirtschaft. Tagungsband zur Sondertagung am 12.02.1994 in Bonn. Beihefte der Konjunkturpolitik, Zeitschrift für angewandte Wirtschaftsforschung, Heft 37. Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Arbeitsgemeinschaft deutscher wirtschaftswissenschaftlicher Forschungsinstitute (1993): Wirtschaftsreformen in Mittel-und Osteuropa. Tagungsband zur Jahrestagung am 14. und 15. Mai 1992 in Bonn. Beihefte der Konjunkturpolitik, Zeitschrift für angewandte Wirtschaftsforschung, Heft 40. Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Auvinen, H. (1994): Premises and Barriers to Commercialisation of Russian IT, Paper presented at the Six Countries Programme Conference on Innovation ‘Research Co-operation with Countries in Transition’ Vienna, Dec. 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Aydalot, P. (Ed.) (1986): Milieux Innovateurs en Europe, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Balazs, K. (1994): Transition Crisis in the Hungarian RandD Sector, in: in: Economic Systems, Vol. 8, p. 281–306.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bartol, K.; Martin, D. (1994): Management, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Batstone, S.; Weszhead, P. (1996): The development of science parks and new-technology based firms in Russia, in B/F p. 72–93.

    Google Scholar 

  12. BBSRC (1995): Corporate Plan 1995–1999. Swindon.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Becher, G.; Kuhlmann, S. (eds.) (1995): Evaluation of Technology Policy Programmes in Germany, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston, London.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bentley, R. (1992): Research and Technology in the Former German Democratic Republic. Boulder, San Francisco, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Besters, H. (Hg.) (1992): Vitalisierung der ostdeutschen Wirtschaft. Öffentlicher Sektor und private Wirtschaft. Baden-Baden.

    Google Scholar 

  16. BIO (1996): The US Biotechnology Industry Organisation: Facts and Figures 1994/95 Edition. Available through internet.

    Google Scholar 

  17. BioCommerce Data Ltd. (1995): The U. K. Biotechnology Handbook ‘85. London.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Borsos, J. (1994): Foreign Companies in Estonia–FDI Policy Implications, Paper presented at the Six Countries Programme Conference on Innovation ‘Research Co-operation with Countries in Transition’ Vienna, Dec. 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bozeman, B.; Melkers, J. (ed.) (1993): Evaluating RandD Impacts: Methods and Practice, Bosten/Dordrecht/London.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Braun, T.; Schubert, A. (1997): Indicators of Research Output in the Sciences from 5 Central European Countries 1990–1994, in: Scientometrics, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Brezinski, H.; Fritsch, M. (1996): The Economic Impact of New Firms in Post-Socialistic Countries - Bottom-up Transformation in Eastern Europe, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Brookfield.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Brower, V. (1996): Alliance seeks to partner US and Israeli biotech companies. GEN 16/16, September 15, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bullock, W.; Dibner, M. (1994): The changing dynamics of strategic alliances between US biotechnology firms and Japanese corporations and universities. Tibtech 12, 397–400.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bullock, W.; Dibner, M. (1995): The state of the US biotechnology industry. Tibtech 13, 463–467.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft (Ed.) (1996): Wirtschaftslage und Reformprozesse in Mittel-und Osteuropa, Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Business Central Europe (1996a): Hope and Despair. July/August, 53. Business Central Europe (1996b): Institutional Investors Dormant, 57–58.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Cabinet Office, Office of Public Service and Science, Office of Science and Technology (1995): Forward Look of Government-funded Science, Engineering and Technology. Volume 2. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Camagni, R. (1991): Local “milieu”, uncertainty and innovation networks: towards a dynamic theory of economic space. In: Camagni, R. (Ed.): Innovation Networks. London, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Carlberg, M. (1994): Makroökonomische Szenarien für das vereinigte Deutschland. Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Clement, K. et al (1995): Regional Policy and Technology Transfer: A Cross-National Perspective, London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Cohen, S. A. et al. (1973): Construction of biologically functional bacterial plasmids in vitro. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 70, 3240–3244.

    Google Scholar 

  32. CVCP (1995): Research in universities, A Briefing by the Committee of Vice-Chancellors and Principals of Universities of the United Kingdom. Briefing Note, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  33. DesForges, C. (1992): Recent Initiatives in the Commercialisation of Academic Research in Europe - Invention to Innovation, Paper presented at the Conference on Perspectives in Technology Transfer organised by the German Association for the Support of Technology and Innovation, June 1992, Bielefeld.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Dickson, D. (1993): Britain urged to lift barriers to investment in biotechnology. Nature 361, 572.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Dickson, D. (1995a): Millions of Pounds. Confirmed lost to universities over funding switch. Nature 377, 664.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Dickson, D. (1995b): UK goes for generic properties in bid to boost science/industry links. Nature 375, 265.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Dittrich, E.J.; Haferkemper, M.; Schmidt, G.; Stojanov, Ch. (Hg.) (1992): Der Wandel industrieller Beziehungen in Osteuropa. Frankfurt am Main.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Dolgopiatova, T. (1996): The Transitional Model of the Behaviour of Russian Industrial Enterprises (on the basis of regular surveys during 1991–1995), IIASA Working Papers 96–57, Laxenburg.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Dudits, D.; Heszky, L. (1990): Növénybiotechnológia (Plant biotechnology), Mezógazdasâgi Kiadó, Budapest.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Dyker, D. (1994): Technology Policy and the Productivity Crisis in Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union, in: Economic Systems, Vol. 8, p. 71–85.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ernst and Young (1994a): Biotech 95: Reform, Restructure, Renewal. Palo Alto. Ernst and Young (1994b): European Biotech 95: Gathering Momentum. Brussels. Ernst and Young (1996): European Biotech 96 - Volatility and Value. London.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Europäische Kommission Generaldirektion Wirtschaft und Finanzen (1996): Wirtschaftliche Lage und Wirtschaftsreformen in Mittel-und Osteuropa, Beiheft C Wirtschaftsreformen, Nr. 2 - Juli.

    Google Scholar 

  43. European Commission (1995): The European Handbook of Management Consultancy, Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Faust, K. et al (1995): Der Wirtschafts-und Forschungsstandort Baden-Württemberg: Potentiale und Perspektiven, ifo Studien zur Strukturforschung; 19/I and II, München.

    Google Scholar 

  45. FCCSET (1992): Biotechnology for the 21st Century. A Report by the FCCSET Committee on Life Sciences and Health. Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  46. FhG ISI (1995): Wirkungsanalyse zum Programm “Förderung der Biotechnologie in der Wirtschaft”. Karlsruhe.

    Google Scholar 

  47. F1eissner, P. (ed.) (1994): The Transformation of Slovakia. The Dynamics of Her Economy, Environment and Demography. Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Forschungsinstitut für anwendungsorientierte Wissensverarbeitung (FAW) (1993): Wirtschaftliche und politische Öffnung zum Osten.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Freeman, C. (1987): Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan, Pinter London.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Freemann, C. (1982): The economics of industrial innovation. 2nd copy, London.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Frenkel, A.; Reiss, T.; Maital, S.; Koschatzky, K.; Grupp, H. (1993): Technometric evaluation and technology policy: the case of biodiagnostic kits in Israel. Research Policy 23, 281–292.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Frigyesi, Veronika (1990a): A biotechnológiai innovâció hazai lehetöségei. A Meriklón sikerei és kudarcai. (Opportunities in Hungary for biotechnological innovations. Case study on Meriklón.) HAS Institute of Industrial Economics, mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Frigyesi, Veronika (1990b): A kutatâsi és fejlesztési eröforrâsok hasznosulâsânak lehetöségei a biotechnológia példâjân. (Opportunities of applying RandD sources in the case of biotechnology.) Ipargazdasâgi Szemle 1, 18–25, Budapest.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Frigyesi, Veronika (1993): A biotechnológia fejlödésének gazdasâgi feltételei (Nemzetközi tapasztalatok). ( Economic conditions in biotechnological development, international experiences ). Dissertation, mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Fritsch, M.; Bröskamp, A.; Schwirten, C. (1996): Innovationen in der sächsischen Industrie - Erste empirische Ergebnisse, Freiberger Working Papers 96/13, Freiberg.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Fröhlich, Z.; Padjen, J.; Svaljek, S. (1995): Partnerships between the public and private sectors - Croatian case, in: Steiner, M. (Ed.): Regionale Innovation: Durch Technologiepolitik zu neuen Strukturen, Leykam Graz.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Gehrig, G.; Welfe, W. (ed.) (1993): Economies in Transition. A System of Models and Forecasts for Germany and Poland. Heidelberg, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Gehrke, B.; Grupp, H. (1994): Innovationspotential und Hochtechnologie: Technologische Position Deutschlands im internationalen Wettbewerb, zweite, vollständig bearbeitete und erweiterte Auflage, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Georghiou, L. (1995): Research evaluation in European national science and technology systems, in: Research Evaluation, Vol 5, p. 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Gerhardt, U.; Mochmann, E. (1992): Gesellschaftlicher Umbruch 1945–1990. Re-Demokratisierung und Lebensverhältnisse. München.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Gibbons, J. H. (1994): Biotechnology: Opportunity and Challenge. National Biotechnology Summit. Washington. Available through intemet.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Glismann, H.; Horn, E.-J.; Stanovnik, P. (1995): Institutional Change in Search of the Market: The Case of Slovenia, Kiel Working Paper No. 706, Kiel.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Grabher, G. (1993): The embedded firm. On the socioeconomics of industrial networks. Routledge, London/New York.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Grupp, H. (Ed.) (1993): Technologien am Beginn des 21. Jahrhundert. Heidelberg. Grupp, H.; Schmoch, U. ( 1992 ): Wissenschaftsbindung der Technik. Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Guerrieri, P. (1994): Technology, Structural Change and Trade Pattern of Eastern Europe, Paper presented at the Six Countries Programme Conference on Innovation ‘Research Co-operation with Countries in Transition’ Vienna Dec 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  66. György, Katalin (1994): RandD and Co-operation in the Hungarian Pharmaceutical Industry. Report to the World Bank, mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  67. György, Katalin; Vincze, Janos (1993): Privatisation and Innovation in the Pharmaceutical Industry in a Post-Socialist Economy. Rivista Internationale di Scienze Sociali, Vol C, No. 3, 403–417.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Hauer et al. (1993): Der Mittelstand in Transformationsprozeß Ostdeutschlands und Osteuropas. Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Hernisniemi, H.; Hyvärinen, J. (1995): Industrial Strategies for Lithuania and Industrial Strategies for Latvia, ETLA, Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Hickel, R.; Priewe, J. (1994): Nach dem Fehlstart. Ökonomische Perspektiven der deutschen Einigung. Frankfurt am Main.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Hilbert, A. (1994): Industrieforschung in den neuen Bundesländern. Ausgangsbedingungen und Reorganisation. Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Hirschmann, K.; Hirschmann, E.; Bode, O.F. (Hg.) (1993): Weltwirtschaftliche Anpassung und Öffnung der osteuropäischen Reformstaaten Transformationskosten, Handelsstrategien, ökologische Modernisierung, Konsumentenverhalten, Humankapital.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Hohmeyer, O.; Hüsing, B.; Maßfeiler, S.; Reiss, T. (1994): Internationale Regulierung der Gentechnik. Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Holland, D. (1995): Evaluation und Transfer eines “Technology Audit”-Verfahrens für MOEL, Zwischenbericht - Ergebnisse der Begleituntersuchung des OECD-Audits in Ungarn, Fraunhofer-Institut für Systemtechnik und Innovationsforschung (ISI), Karlsruhe, März 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Hutschenreiter, G. (1994): Research Co-operation with Countries in Transition, Paper presented at the Six Countries Programme Conference on Innovation ‘Research Co-operation with Countries in Transition’ Vienna, Dec. 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  76. ifo (1994): Stand und Entwicklung der Beschäftigung von Biotechnologen in Deutschland. München.

    Google Scholar 

  77. ifo-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (1991): The Role of EC Investment in Promoting RandD Capabilities and Technological Innovation in Eastern European Countries: Scientific Goals and Financial Instruments“ Interim Report, Part I, CSFR and Poland, München.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Indruch, R. (1994): Der Übergang zur sozialen Marktwirtschaft in den Ländern des ehemaligen RGW am Beispiel der CSFR und Ungarns. Konstanz.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung Halle (IWH) (Hg.) (1994): Wirtschaft im System- schock. Die schwierige Realität der ostdeutschen Transformation. Essen.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Inzelt, A. (1995a): For a better understanding of the innovation process in Hungary, SPRU, STEEP Discussion Paper No 22, University of Sussex.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Inzelt, A. (1995b): Workshop on the Implementation of OECD Methodologies for the Collection and Compilation of RandD/SandT Statistics in the Partner in Transition Countries and the Russian Federation: Methodological Lessons of the Hungarian Pilot Innovation Survey, 4–5 December, Draft version.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Inzelt, A. (1995c): Review of Recent Developments in Science and Technology in Hungary. OECD Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Inzelt, A. (1996a): The Hungarian Industry, in: Widmaier, B., Potratz, W. (ed.): The Future of Industry in Central and Eastern Europe, Institut Arbeit und Technik.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Inzelt, A. (1996b): Institutional Transfer in a Post-Socialist Country (the Case of the Bay Zoltan Foundation for Applied Research and its Institutes), in: CERNA: Innovation in Eastern Europe and Russia - Technical Modernization, Combinates and Enterprises, April, Ecole des Mines, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Inzelt, A. (1996c): Institutional and Behavioural Conditions for Innovativeness in Central and East Europe, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  86. JBA (1993): Japan Bioindustry Letter, 10 /36, 4–7.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Kaiser, K.-A.; Tamm, A. (1992): Osteuropa auf dem Weg zur Marktwirtschaft. Zehn Fallstudien mit Lösungsansätzen. Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Keren, M. (1996): A dynamic evolutionary perspective on transformation, in: Brezinski/Fritsch, p. 35–51.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Kinoshita, J. (1993): Is Japan a boon or a burden to US industry’s leadership? Science 259, 596–598.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Kline, S.J.; Rosenberg, N. (1986): An Overview of Innovation, in: Rosenberg, N./Landau, R., eds.: The Positive Sum Strategy, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Klodt, H.; Paqué, H. (1993): Am Tiefpunkt der Transformationskrise: Industrie-und lohnpolitische Weichenstellungen in den jungen Bundesländern. Kieler Diskussionsbeiträge, Nr. 213.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Klodt, Henning (1993): Perspektiven des Ost-West-Handels: Die komparativen Vorteile der mittel-und osteuropäischen Reformländer, in: Die Weltwirtschaft, S. 424–440.

    Google Scholar 

  93. König, H.; Steiner, V. (Hg.) (1994): Arbeitsdynamik und Unternehmensentwicklung in Osteuropa. Erfahrungen und Perspektiven des Transformationsprozesses. Beiträge eines Workshops des Zentrums für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung (LEW) am 4. und 5. März 1993 in Mannheim.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Kosals, L. (1996): Military RandD Institutes in the Context of Demilitarization in Russia, IIASA Working Papers WP-94–002, Laxenburg.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Kuhlmann, S. (1994): Ideas for Discussion, Technology Audit For Central and Eastern European Countries - Workshop on Assessment Approaches of Competitive Technological Innovation Potentials for Transformation Economies, February, Karlsruhe.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Kuhlmann, S. (1995): Patterns of science and technology policy evaluation in Germany, in: Research Evaluation, Vol 5, p. 23–33.

    Google Scholar 

  97. Kuhlmann, S.; Holland, D. (1995a): Evaluation von Technologiepolitik in Deutschland: Konzepte, Anwendungen, Perspektiven, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  98. Kuhlmann, S.; Holland, D. (1995b): Erfolgsfaktoren der wirtschaftsnahen Forschung, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  99. Kuhlmann, S.; Reger, G. (1996): Technology-Intensive SMEs: Policies Supporting the Management of Growing Technological Complexity, in: Cannel, W., Dankbaar, B.: Technology Management and Public Policy in the European Union, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Lipsitz, I. (1996): The Dynamics of Russian Industrial Enterprises’ Financial Situation (1992–1994), IIASA Working Paper 96–064, Vienna.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Luft, Ch. (1992): Treuhandreport. Werden, Wachsen und Vergehen einer deutschen Behörde. Berlin, Weimar.

    Google Scholar 

  102. Lundvall, B.-A. (1992): Introduction in Lundvall, B.-A. National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, Pinter London.

    Google Scholar 

  103. Mayntz, R.; Schimank, U.; Weingart, P. (Ed.) (1995): Transformation mittel-und osteuropäischer Wissenschaftssysteme. Länderberichte. Opladen.

    Google Scholar 

  104. Meyer-Krahmer, F. (1987): Evaluating Innovation Policies: The German Experience, in: Technovation, Vol. 5, p. 317–330.

    Google Scholar 

  105. Meyer-Krahmer, F. (1991): Technology Policy Evaluation in Germany, Contribution to the SPRU international Conference on Science and technology Policy Evaluation, October 1991, London.

    Google Scholar 

  106. Mohâcsi, Kâlmän (1996): The Hungarian Food Industry. In: The Future of Industry in Central and Eastern Europe. Institut Arbeit und Technik.

    Google Scholar 

  107. Muller, E.; Gundrum, U.; Koschatzky, K. (1995): Methodology in Design, Construction and Operation of Regional Technology Frameworks. Needs analysis of the innovation and technology support requirements of firms within a region, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research, Karlsruhe.

    Google Scholar 

  108. Müller, W. (1993): Die Wirtschaftstransformation in Mittel-und Osteuropa als theoretisches Problem. In: Zapotoczky, K. 1993: Mittel-und Osteuropa: Eine Herausforderung für die Unternehmensberatung. Stuttgart, Berlin, Köln.

    Google Scholar 

  109. Münt, G. (1996): Dynamik von Innovation und Außenhandel: Entwicklung technologischer und wirtschaftlicher Spezialisierungsmuster, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  110. Nature, Vol 381, 23 May 1996, 262.

    Google Scholar 

  111. Nauwelaers, C.; Reid, A. (1995): Innovative regions? A comparative review of methods of evaluating regional innovation potential, RIDER/European Commission, Louvain-La-Neuve/Luxembourg.

    Google Scholar 

  112. OECD (1991a): OECD Wirtschaftsberichte Tschechische und Slowakische Föderative Republik 1991, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  113. OECD (199 lb): OECD Wirtschaftsberichte Deutschland 1991/1992, Paris. OECD ( 1991c ): OECD Wirtschaftsberichte Ungarn 1991, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  114. OECD (1992): OECD Wirtschaftsberichte Polen 1992, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  115. OECD (1993a): Science, Technology and Innovation Policies Hungary, Paris. OECD ( 1993b ): OECD Economic Surveys Hungary 1993, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  116. OECD (1994a): Barriers to Trade with the Economies in Transition. Centre for Cooperation with the Economies in Transition. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  117. OECD (1994b): Science, Technology and Innovation Policies. Federation of Russia. Volume 1. Evaluation Report. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  118. OECD (1994c): OECD Wirtschaftsberichte Tschechische Republik und Slowakische Republik1994, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  119. OECD (1994d): OECD Economic Surveys Poland 1994, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  120. OECD (1994e): Industry in the Czech and Slovak Republics, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  121. OECD (1995a): OECD Economic Surveys. Hungary, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  122. OECD (1995b): Review of Industry and Industrial Policy in Hungary. OECD, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  123. OECD (1995c): Methodology of Technology Audit, Draft by the OECD Secretariate February 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  124. OECD (1995d): OECD Wirtschaftsberichte Die Russische Föderation 1995, Paris. OECD ( 1996 ): Main Science and Technology Indicators, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  125. OMFB (1995): Innovâciós folyamatok a gazdasâgban. ( Innovation Processes in the Hungarian Economy.) OMFB, Budapest.

    Google Scholar 

  126. Oppenländer, K. (Hg.) (1992): Aktuelle Probleme beim Übergang von der Plan-zur Marktwirtschaft. ifo - IMEMO-Symposium am 2. und 3. September 1991 in Moskau.

    Google Scholar 

  127. OTA (1991): Biotechnology in a global economy. Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  128. Patent and Trademark Office (1992): Highlights in Patent Activity. U.S. Department of Commerce, October.

    Google Scholar 

  129. Porter, M. (1990): The Competitive Advantage of Nations, The Macmillan Press Ltd. London, Basingstoke.

    Google Scholar 

  130. Powell, W.; Brantley, P. (1992): Competitive Cooperation in Biotechnology: Learning through Networks? In: Nohria, N.; Eccles, R. (eds.): Networks and Organisations: Structure, Form, and Action. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (Massachusetts).

    Google Scholar 

  131. Pradetto, A. (Hg.) (1994): Die Rekonstruktion Ostmitteleuropas. Politik, Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft im Umbruch. Opladen.

    Google Scholar 

  132. PROGNOS AG (Hg.) (1992): Vom Umbruch zum Aufbruch. Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  133. Reiss, T. (1996): Knowledge Transfer in Biotechnology–The Case of Germany. In: Inzelt, A.; Coenen, R (eds.): Knowledge, Technology Transfer and Forecasting, 25–31. Kluwer, Dordercht. Boston, London.

    Google Scholar 

  134. Reiss, T.; Hüsing, B. (1992): Potentialanalyse für Auftragsforschung in der Biotechnologie. Karlsruhe.

    Google Scholar 

  135. Reiss, T.; Jaeckel, G. (1994): Analyse der baden-württembergischen FuE-Strukturen und Potentiale in der Biotechnologie. Karlsruhe.

    Google Scholar 

  136. Research Evaluation (1995): Special issue on National systems for evaluation of RandD in the European Union, Vol 5, No 1 April.

    Google Scholar 

  137. Roeger, W. (1994): Wage Behaviour and Convergence in Open Economies. Lessons for eastern Germany, in: König/Steiner (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  138. Rossi, P.H.; Freeman, H.E. (1985): Evaluation, A Systematic Approach, 3rd ed., Sage Publications, Beverly Hills et al.

    Google Scholar 

  139. Saage, D. et al (1992): Technology Auditing in Germany, Final Report, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research, Karlsruhe.

    Google Scholar 

  140. Saage, D.; Hemer, J. (1981): Möglichkeiten für den zukünftigen Ausbau des Produktprogramms der Fa. Inovan-Stroebe GmbH and Co. KG, Final Report, Fraunhofer Institut for Systems and Innovation Research, Karlsruhe.

    Google Scholar 

  141. Schikora, A.; Fiedler, A.; Hein, E. (1992): Politische Ökonomie im Wandel. Marburg.

    Google Scholar 

  142. Schimank, U. (1995): Die Transformation der Forschung in Mittel-und Osteuropa: Gelegenheiten, Ziele und Zwänge, in: Wollmann, H., Wiesenthal, Böänker, F. (Ed.): Transformation sozialistischer Gesellschaften: Am Ende des Anfangs, Leviathan Sonderheft 15/1995 Westdeutscher Verlag, p. 321–345.

    Google Scholar 

  143. Schmid, R. et al. (1995): Biotechnology in the Asian-Pacific Region. In: Rehm, H.-J.; Reed, G. (eds.): Biotechnology 12, 369–432. Weinheim.

    Google Scholar 

  144. Schmidt, R. (Hg.) (1993): Zwischenbilanz. Analysen zum Transformationsprozeß der ostdeutschen Industrie. Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  145. Schmoch, U.; Grupp, H.; Laube, T. (1996): Standortvoraussetzungen und technologische Trends, in: Bundesamt für Konjunkturfragen (ed.): Modernisierung am Technikstandort Schweiz, Vdf Hochschulverlag AG an der ETH Zürich, Zürich.

    Google Scholar 

  146. Schmoch, U.; Strauss, E.; Grupp, H.; Reiss, T. (1993): Indicators of the Scientific Base of European Patents. Karlsruhe.

    Google Scholar 

  147. Schmoch, U.; Strauss, E.; Reiss, T. (1992): Patent law and patent analysis in biotechnology. Biotech Forum Europe 9, 379–384.

    Google Scholar 

  148. Schneider, C. (1994): Research and Development Management: From the Soviet Union to Russia. Heidelberg, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  149. Schneider, C. (1996): Post-socialism and Impact of the Economic Reforms on Industrial Research: A Study of Czech and Slovak Research Institutes in the Electrotechnical Sector, in: CERNA: Innovation in Eastern Europe and Russia - Technical Modernization, Combinates and Enterprises, April, Ecole des Mines, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  150. Schneider, R. (1992): CIM Planning in Small and Medium-Sized Companies, in: Saage, D. (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  151. Schwitalla, B. (1993): Messung und Erklärung industrieller Innovationsaktivitäten: mit einer empirischen Analyse für die westdeutsche Industrie, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  152. Segal Quince Wicksteed Limited (1995): Technical Assistance for the Restructuring of Science and Technology in Romania, Working materials, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  153. Shama, A. (1995): Developing and Testing a Theory of Management Transformation from Planned to Market Economy: The Case of Russia, in: Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 48, 77–100.

    Google Scholar 

  154. Shapira, P.; Paskaleva, K. (1994): After Central Planning: The Restructuring of State Industry in Bulgaria’s Bourgas Region, in: European Planning Studies, Vol. 2, p. 131–157.

    Google Scholar 

  155. Shaw, B. (1996): Networking in the Russian aerospace industry, in: RandD Management, Vol. 26 No 3, 255–265.

    Google Scholar 

  156. Siebert, H. (Ed.) (1993): Overcoming the transformation crisis: Lessons for the successor states of the Soviet Union, Mohr Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  157. Smallbone, D.; Venesaar, U.; Piasecki, B. (1996): Employment Change and Labour Market Issues in Manufacturing SMEs in Poland and the Baltic States: Some Implications for Policy, paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on SME Development Policy in Transition Economies: Centre for Urban Studies, University of Bristol, 24–25 October 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  158. Somogyi, L. (1993): The Political Economy of the Transition Process in Eastern Europe. Proceedings of the 13th Arne Ryde Symposium, Rungsted Kyst, 11 and 12 June 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  159. Spencer, V.; Kirk, D. (1994): U.K. boasts Europe’s biggest public sector.

    Google Scholar 

  160. Statistisches Bundesamt (1995): Ausgaben für biotechnologische Forschung. Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  161. Stoyanovska, A.; Krastenova, E. (1996): Development of the SMEs in Bulgaria, paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on SME Development Policy in Transition Economies: Centre for Urban Studies, University of Bristol, 24–25 October 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  162. Szântó, B. (1995): Science Policy Dilemma: Justification of Unbound Research or Strategic Support of Technology Policy, prepared for Symposium on “Changing Trends in Science Policy: Theory and Practice, Göteborg, Nov. 2325, Budapest.

    Google Scholar 

  163. Tournemine, R.; Muller, E. (1996): Transition and Development of Innovation Ca- pacities in Hungary, in Research Management, Vol. 26 No 2, 101–113.

    Google Scholar 

  164. United Nations (1996): Review of Changes in National Policies, priorities and Institutions, and International Cooperation. Economic and Social Council.

    Google Scholar 

  165. United Nations (UN) (1992): Biotechnology and Development. Expanding the Capacity to Produce Food. In: Mary Pat, Williams Silviera (eds.): United Nations (UN) 9, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  166. Valigra, L. (1994): Academic biotech deals offer more promise than product. Science 263, 168–169.

    Google Scholar 

  167. Wagener, H.-J. (ed.) (1993): The Political Economy of Transformation. Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  168. Ward, M. ( 1994 a): UK biotech will boom over next few years. BioTechnology 12, 230.

    Google Scholar 

  169. Ward, M. ( 1994 b): Dramatic growth forecast for UK biotechnology firms. Nature 367, 674.

    Google Scholar 

  170. Westphal, A.; Herr, H.; Heine, M.; Busch, U. (1991): Wirtschaftspolitische Konsequenzen der deutschen Vereinigung. Frankfurt am Main, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  171. World Bank (1996): World Development Report 1996. From Plan to Market, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  172. Zapotoczky, K. (Hg.) (1993): Mittel-und Osteuropa: Eine Herausforderung für die Unternehmensberatung. Stuttgart, Berlin, Köln.

    Google Scholar 

  173. Zeschmann, P. (1993): Ideen für ein wirtschaftliches Überleben Ostdeutschlands. Eine wirtschaftspolitische Konzeption zur Bewältigung des Strukturwandels in den neuen Bundesländern. Thun, Frankfurt am Main.

    Google Scholar 

Related Literature

  • Balmer, B.; Sharp, M. (1993): The Battle for biotechnology: Scientific and technological paradigms and the management of biotechnology in Britain in the 1980s. Research Policy 22, 463–478, Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biotechnology (1996): U.S. Senate defining, agency defining, FDA reforms 14, 138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boldogköi, Z. (1995): Biotechnológia: Tudomâny a gazdasâgban. ( Biotechnolgy: Science in the Economy.) Gödöllöi Agrârtudomanyi Egyetem, mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • CIS Survey (1993): OECD/EC Harmonised Questionnaire 1992/93, OECDEUROSTAT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crafts-Lighty, A.; Burak Reed, E.; Gallagher, A.; Da Gama, L.: The UK Biotechnology Handbook ‘84. BioCommerce Data Ltd. and Biolndustry Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faulkner, W.; Senker, J. (1995): Knowledge Frontiers. Public Sector Research and Industrial Innovation in Biotechnology, Engineering Ceramics and Parallel Computing, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fazekas-Horvath, Z.; Csorba, J. (eds.) (1987): A biotechnológia gazdasâgi vonatkozâsai (Economic aspects of biotechnology) Orszâgos Mûszakí Infor-mâciós Központ és Könyvtâr, Témadokumentâciós Kiadvânyok 151. sz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fildes, R.A. (1990): Strategic Challenges in Commercialising Biotechnology. California Management Review Vol. 32 No. 3, 63–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrest, E.; Martin M. J. (1992): Strategic alliances between large and small research intensive organisations: experiences in the biotechnology industry. RandD Management, Vol. 22, No. 1, 41–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grieve, J.; Fleck V. (1988): Strategies of New Biotechnology Firms. Long Range Planning, Vol. 21, No. 3, 51–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S.S. (1988): Invisible Frontiers. The Race to Synthesise a Human Gene. Sidgwick and Jackson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W.F.; Villa, J.; Dibner, M.D. (1990): Patterns of Strategic Choice in Emerging Firms: Positioning for Innovation in Biotechnology. California Management Review, Vol. 32, No. 3, 73–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howells, J. (1994): Managers and Innovation. Strategies for a biotechnology, Routledge. London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inzelt, A.; Coenen, R. (1996): Knowledge, Technology Transfer and Forecasting. Kluwer, Dordercht. Boston, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S. (1992): The biotechnologists and the evolution of biotechnology enterprises in the USA and Europe. Macmillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey, M. (1996): Redefining Transfer in Biotechnology and Software: Multiple Creation of Knowledge and Issues of Ownership. In: Inzelt, A.; Coenen, R. (eds.): Knowledge, Technology Transfer and Forecasting, 33–47. Kluwer. Dordercht. Boston, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. (1993): National Innovation Systems, a Comparative Analysis. Oxford University Press, New York, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakey, R.; Faulkner, W.; Cooper, S.; Walsh, V. (1990): New Firms in the Biotechnology Industry: Their Contribution to Innovation and Growth. Pinter Publishers, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orsenigo, L. (1989): The Emergence of Biotechnology. Institutions and Markets in Industrial Innovation. Pinter Publishers, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oslo Manual 1992, OECD, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pisano, G.P. (1990): The RandD Boundaries of the Firm: An Empirical Analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 153–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pisano, Gary P. (1994): Knowledge, Integration, and the Locus of Learning: an Empirical Analysis of Process Development. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 15, 85–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudân, F. (1996): Biotechnológia és biztonsâg. (Biotechnology and Biosafety). Európa Fórum, 2, Budapest, 127–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapienza, A.M. (1989): Technology transfer: an assessment of the major institutional vehicles for diffusion of U.S. biotechnology. Technovation, 9, 463–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senker, J.; Sharp, M. (1988): The Biotechnology directorate of the SERC. Report and Evaluation of its Achievements 1981–1987, SPRU working paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, M. (1985): The New Biotechnology, European Governments in Search of a Strategy, Sussex European Papers No. 15, SPRU, University of Sussex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, M. (1989): Biotechnology in the UK. OTA Conference on Biotechnology in a global environment, Washington, SPRU mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, M. (1989): The management and coordination of biotechnology in the U.K. 1980–88, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B 324, 509–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, M. (1993): The Protein Engineering Club. An Assessment of the Club as an Experiment in Promoting a Programme of Strategic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tylecote, A. (1995): Environment, Technology and Economic Growth: Challenge to Sustainable Development, Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bross, U., Inzelt, A., Reiß, T. (1998). References. In: Bio-Technology Audit in Hungary. Technology, Innovation and Policy, vol 7. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-52472-1_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-52472-1_12

  • Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-1092-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-52472-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics