Skip to main content
Book cover

Compstat pp 81–93Cite as

Construction of Decision Procedures for Selecting Populations

  • Conference paper
  • 114 Accesses

Abstract

Selection procedures are considered in a significance testing point of view. Recent results on the equivalence between selection procedures and multiple tests for a certain class of hypotheses are reviewed and then first applied to construct selection rules for choosing the best population. When under design aspects certain power requirements are incorporated, the classical indifference zone approach of Bechhofer as well as Gupta’s subset selection formulation can be shown to fit into this general framework. The equivalence results are moreover demonstrated to provide efficient stepwise procedures for the problem of selecting a subset of populations that contains all good ones. Treating this latter problem by imposing the additional requirement to select none of the bad populations leads to partitioning rules. Selection rules for the one-way layout under a normal distributional set-up are dealt with in detail, and the resulting numerical problems are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, P. 0., Bishop, T. A., AND Dudewicz, E. J. (1977). Indifference-zone ranking and selection: confidence intervals for true achieved P(CD). Commun. Statist.–Theor. Meth A6, 1121–1132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechhofer, R. E. (1954). A single-sample multiple decision procedure for ranking normal populations with known variances. Ann. Math. Statist 25, 16–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brent, R. P. (1973). Algorithms for minimization without derivates. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broström, G. (1981). On sequentially rejective subset selection procedures. Comm. Statist.–Theor. Meth. A10, 203–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finner, H AND Giani, G. (1994a). Closed subset selection procedures for selecting good populations. J. Statist. Planning Infer 38 179–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finner, H AND Giani, G. (1994b). Duality between multiple testing and selecting. To appear in a special issue of: J. Statist. Planning Infer

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, K. R. (1969). Simultaneous test procedures–some theory of multiple comparisons. Ann. Math. Statist 40, 224–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giani, G. AND Finner, H. (1991). Some general results on least favourable parameter configurations with special reference to equivalence testing and the range statistic. J. Statist. Planning Infer 28, 33–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S. S. (1956). On a decision rule for a problem in ranking means. Ph. D. Thesis (Mimeo Ser. No. 150). Inst. of Statist, Univ. of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S. S. (1965). On some multiple decision (selection and ranking) rules. Technometrics 7, 225–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutmann, S. AND Maymin, Z. (1987). Is the selected population the best? Ann. Statist 15, 456–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, I. D. (1973). Algorithm AS66: The normal integral. Appl. Statist 22, 424–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahaner, D. K. AND Stoer, J. (1983). Extrapolated adaptive quadrature. Siam J. Sci. Statist. Comput. Vol. 4, No. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, W.-C. (1986). A lower confidence bound on the probability of a correct selection. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc 81, 1012–1017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, K. (1986). A new procedure for selecting good populations. Biometrika 73, 201–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naik, U. D. (1975). Some selection rules for comparing p processes with a standard. Comm. Statist 4, 519–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naik, U. D. (1977). Some subset selection problems. Comm. Statist.–Theor. Meth A6, 955–966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stefansson, G. Kim, W.-C. AND Hsu, J. C. (1988). On confidence sets in multiple comparisons. In: Statistical Decision Theory and related Topics, Vol. IV. Ed.: S. S. Gupta and J. O. Berger. Academic Press, New York, 89–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroud, A. H AND Don Secrest (1966). Gaussian quadrature formulas. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Tong, Y. L. (1969). On partitioning a set of populations by their locations with respect to a control. Ann. Math. Statist 40, 1300–1324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Giani, G. (1994). Construction of Decision Procedures for Selecting Populations. In: Dutter, R., Grossmann, W. (eds) Compstat. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-52463-9_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-52463-9_9

  • Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-0793-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-52463-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics