Abstract
Usually, inferences on the reliability function R(t 0) at time t 0 assuming different parametrical models and censored lifetime observations are obtained by using asymptotical methods. One of these asymptotical results is given by the asymptotical normality of the maximum likelihood estimators. Under the Bayesian approach, we get marginal posterior densities or posterior moments for R(t 0) based on numerical or approximation methods. These results, usually depend on an appropriate transformation of R(t 0 ), to get accurate results. One way to find an appropriate reparametrization, is to search for a one-to-one transformation of R(t 0) that gives close “normality” for the likelihood function (see for example, Anscombe, 1964; Sprott, 1973, 1980; Kass and Slate, 1992; or Hills and Smith, 1993). Assuming a Weibull distribution for the lifetimes in a reliability experiment, we explore the use of some popular transformations for proportions (see for example, Guerrero and Johnson, 1982; or Aranda-Ordaz, 1981) and a measure to nonnormality of likelihood functions or posterior densities given by the standardized form of the third derivative of the logarithm of the likelihood or posterior density (see Sprott, 1973; or Kass and Slate, 1992). We also check the adequability of the proposed reparametrization, by using the t-plot proposed by Hills and Smith (1993).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
ANSCOMBE, F.J. (1964) Normal likelihood functions, Ann. Inst. Stat. Math., 16, 1–19.
ARANDA-ORDAZ, F.J. (1981). On two families of transformations to additivity for binary response data, Biometrika, 68, 357–363.
ATKINSON, A.C. (1985). Plots, transformations and regression. Oxford: Clarendon press.
GUERRERO, V.M.; JOHNSON, R.A. (1982). Use of the Box-Cox transformation with binary response models, Biometrika, 69, 309–314.
HILLS, S.E.; SMITH, A.F.M. (1993). Diagnostic plots for improved parametrization in Bayesian inference, Biometrika, 80, 1, 61–74.
KASS, R.E., SLATE, E.H. (1992). Reparametrization and diagnostics of posterior nonnormality. In Bayesian Statistics 4, Ed. J.M. Bernardo
J.O. BERGER, A.P. DAWID and A.F.M. SMITH, pp. 289–306. Oxford University Press.
LAWLESS, J.F. (1982). Statistical models and methods for lifetime data. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
MARTZ, H.F.; WALLER, R.A. (1982). Bayesian Reliability Analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
SPROTT, D.A. (1973). Normal likelihoods and their relation to large sample theory of estimation, Biometrika, 60, 457–465.
SPROTT, D.A. (1980). Maximum likelihood in small samples: estimation in the presence of nuisance parameters, Biometrika, 67, 515–523.
TIERNEY, L.; KADANE, J.B. (1986). Accurate approximations for posterior moments and marginal densities, Jour. of American Stat. Association, 81, 82–86.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1994 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Achcar, J.A. (1994). Approximate Bayesian Inferences for the Reliability in the Weibull Case: Some Aspects of Reparametrization. In: Dutter, R., Grossmann, W. (eds) Compstat. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-52463-9_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-52463-9_19
Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-0793-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-52463-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive