Advertisement

Humangenetische Beratung bei wiederholten Aborten

  • W. Fuhrmann
  • W. Foerster
Conference paper

Zusammenfassung

Die WHO definiert als Abort den Verlust eines Embryos oder Feten mit einem Gewicht von 500 g oder weniger, entsprechend der 20. bis 22. Schwangerschaftswoche, andere Statistiken ziehen die Grenze bei 1000 g oder vor der 28. Schwangerschaftswoche. Vergleichende Statistiken werden dadurch sehr erschwert, da häufig keine genauen Angaben vorliegen. Auch in unserem eigenen Material hatten wir in der Regel keine exakten Angaben über das Alter der abortierten Schwangerschaft und das Gewicht des Feten.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Adinolfi M (1986) Recurrent habitual abortion, HLA sharing and deliberate immunization with partner’s cells: a controversial topic. Hum Reprod 1:45–48PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartels I, Hansmann I, Eiben B (1990) Excess of females in chromosomally normal spontaneous abortuses. Am J Med Genet 35:297–298PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bhasin MK, Foerster W, Fuhrmann W (1973) A cytogenetic study of recurrent abortion. Humangenetik 18:139–148PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boue A, Boue J, Gropp A (1985) Cytogenetics of pregnancy wastage. In: Harris H, Hirschhorn K (eds) Advances in human genetics, vol 14. Plenum Press, New York, pp 1–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bourrouillo G, Colombies P, Dastugue N (1986) Chromosome studies in 2136 couples with spontaneous abortions. Hum Genet 74:399–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Castle D, Bernstein R (1988) Cytogenetic analysis of 688 couples experiencing multiple spontaneous abortions. Am J Med Genet 29:549–556PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eiben B, Bartels I, Bahrporsch S et al (1990) Cytogenetic analysis of 750 spontaneous abortions with the direct-preparation method of chorionic villi and its implications for studying genetic causes of pregnancy wastage. Am J Hum Genet 47:656–663PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Haas G (1986) Chromosomenaberrationen bei Paaren mit wiederholten Aborten. Med Dissertation, Universität GießenGoogle Scholar
  9. Hassold T, Chiu D (1985) Maternal age-specific rates of numerical chromosome abnormalities with special reference to trisomy. Hum Genet 70:11–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ho HN, Gill TJ, Nsich RP (1990) Sharing of human leukocyte antigens in primary and secondary recurrent spontaneous abortions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 163:178–188PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Klebanoff MA, Shiono PH, Rhoads GG (1990) Outcome of pregnancy in a national sample of resident physicians. N Engl J Med 323:1040–1045PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lenz W (1979) Medizinische Genetik, 4. Aufl. Thieme, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  13. Minguillon C, Eiben B, Bahrporsch S, Vogel M, Hansmann I (1989) The predictive value of chorionic villus histology for identifying chromosomally normal and abnormal spontaneous abortions. Hum Genet 82:373–376PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rockelein G, Ulmer R, Schroder J (1990) Karyotype and placental structure of first-trimester spontaneous abortions: a morphometrical study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 38:25–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sachs ES, Jahoda MGJ, Van Hemel JO, Hoogeboom AJM, Sandkuyl LA (1985) Chromosome studies of 500 couples with two or more abortions. Obstet Gynecol 65:375–379PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Schmid W (1962) A familial chromosome abnormality associated with repeated abortions. Cytogenetics 1:199PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Stirrat GM (1990 a) Recurrent miscarriage I: definition and epidemiology. Lancet 336:673–675PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Stirrat GM (1990b) Recurrent miscarriage II: clinical associations, causes, and management. Lancet 336:728–733PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Stray-Pedersen B, Stray-Pedersen S (1988) Recurrent abortion: the role of psychotherapy. In: Beard RW, Sharp F (eds) Early pregnancy loss: mechanisms and treatment. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London, pp 433–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. United Nations Sources and Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation. United Nations Scientific Committe on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (1982) Report to the General Assembly, with Annexes. United Nations Publication No. E82.IX.8, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Vogel F (1985) Gesichertes und Hypothetisches im Bereich der Strahlengenetik. In: Leppin W, Meissner J, Boerner W, Messerschmidt O (Hrsg) Die Hypothesen im Strahlenschutz. Thieme, Stuttgart (Strahlenschutz in Forschung und Praxis, Bd XXV, S 144–168)Google Scholar
  22. Warburton D, Kline J, Stein Z, Hutzler M, Chin A, Hassold T (1987) Does the karyotype of a spontaneous abortion predict the karyotype of a subsequent abortion? — Evidence from 273 women with two karyotyped spontaneous abortions. Am J Hum Genet 41:465–483PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Warburton D, Byrne J, Kline J (1990) Prenatal development in spontaneous abortions with chromosome anomalies. Am J Hum Genet 47/3 (abstracts)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Fuhrmann
  • W. Foerster

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations