Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Contributions to Management Science ((MANAGEMENT SC.))

Abstract

Selected techniques suitable for postoptimality and sensitivity analysis for the optimal value of portfolio management problems based on incompletely known input data are presented. The discussed problems involve Markowitz mean-variance model with estimated expected returns (Section 2), the effect of inclusion of additional scenarios in bond management problems (Section 3) and a treatment of incomplete knowledge of liabilities (Section 4).

Supported by the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic under grant No. 402/93/0631

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Asay, M. R., P. J. Bouyoucos and A. M. Marciano, ‘An economic approach to valuation of single premium deferred annuities’, in: Financial Optimization (Zenios, S. A., ed.), Cambridge University Press, 101–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bank, B., J. Guddat, D. Klatte, B. Kummer and K. Tammer, 1982, Non-Linear Parametric Optimization, Akademie Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Best, M.J. and R. R. Grauer, 1991, ‘Sensitivity analysis for mean-variance portfolio problems’, Management Science 37, 980–989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, F., E. Derman and W. Toy, 1990, ‘A one-factor model of interest rates and its application to treasury bond options’, Financial Analysts Journal, 33–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, S. P. and D. B. Crane, 1972, ‘A dynamic model for bond portfolio management’, Management Science 19, 139–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cariño, D. R., T. Kent, D. H. Meyers, C. Stacy, M. Sylvanus, A. L. Turner, K. Watanabe and W. T. Ziemba, 1994, ‘The Russell — Yasuda Kassai model: An asset/liability model for a Japanese insurance company using multistage stochastic programming’, Interfaces 24, 29–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chopra, V. K. and W. T. Ziemba, 1993, ‘The effect of errors in means, variances and covariances on optimal portfolio choice’, J. Portfolio Mgt. 19, 6–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, J. C., J. E. Ingersoll Jr. and S. A. Ross, 1985, ‘A theory of term structure of interest rates’, Econometrica 53, 385–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, H., A. Meeraus and S. A. Zenios, 1993, ‘Some financial optimization models: I. Risk management’, in: Financial Optimization (Zenios, S. A., ed.), Cambridge University Press, 3–36.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dembo, R. S., 1993, ‘Scenario immunization’, in: Financial Optimization (Zenios, S. A., ed.), Cambridge University Press, 290–308.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dempster, M. A. H. and A. M. Ireland, 1988, ‘A financial expert decision system’, in: Math. Models for Decision Support (Mitra, B., ed.), NATO ASI Series, Vol. F48. Springer, Berlin, 415–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupačová, J., 1984, ‘Stability in stochastic programming with recourse — Estimated parameters’, Math. Progr. 28, 72–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dupačová, J., 1995a, ‘Postoptimality for multistage stochastic linear programs’, Annals of Oper. Res. 56, 65–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dupačová, J., 1995b, ‘Scenario based stochastic programs: Resistance with respect to sample’, to appear in Annals of Oper. Res.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupačová, J. and M. Bertocchi, 1995, ‘Management of bond portfolios via stochastic programming — Postoptimality and sensitivity analysis’, to appear in System Modelling and Optimization, Proc. of the 17-th IFIP Conference, Prague (Doležal, J. and J. Fidler, eds.), Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiacco, A. V., 1983, Introduction to Sensitivity and Stability Analysis in Nonlinear Programming, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gol’shtein, E. G., 1970, Vypukloje Programmirovanie. Elementy Teoriji, Nauka, Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gol’shtein, E. G., [Theory of Convex Programming, Translations of Mathematical Monographs 36, American Mathematical Society, Providence RI, 1972].

    Google Scholar 

  • Golub, B., M. R. Holmer, R. McKendall, L. Pohlman and S. A. Zenios, 1995, ‘A stochastic programming model for money management’, to appear in EJOR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guddal, J., 1976, ‘Stability in convex quadratic parametric programming’, Math. Operationsforsch. u. Statist. 7, 223–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiller, R. S. and J. Eckstein, 1993, ‘Stochastic dedication: Designing fixed income portfolios using massively parallel Benders decomposition’, Management Science 39, 1422–1438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, T. S. Z. and S.-B. Lee, 1986, ‘Term structure movements and pricing interest rates contingent claims’, J. Finance 41, 1011–1129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmer, M. R., D. Yang and S. A. Zenios, 1993, ‘Designing callable bonds using simulated annealing’, Report 93–07–02, Decision Sciences Department, The Wharton School, Univ. of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmer, M. R., R. McKendall, C. Vassiliadou-Zeniou and S. A. Zenios, 1993, ‘Dynamic models for fixed-income portfolio management under uncertainty’, Report 93–11–01, Decision Sciences Department, The Wharton School, Univ. of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huoponen, T., 1994, ‘Stochastic optimization of a multi-currency bond portfolio’, WP-94–98, IIASA, Laxenburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, J. M. and S. A. Zenios, 1991, ‘Financial simulations on a massively parallel connection machine’, Internat. J. Supercomputer Applic. 5, 27–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, P. and S. A. Zenios, 1992, ‘Complete prepayment models for mortgage-backed securities’, Management Science 38, 1661–1685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kusy, M.I. and W. T. Ziemba, 1986, ‘A bank asset and liability management model’, Oper. Res. 34, 356–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madansky, A., 1960, ‘Inequalities for stochastic programming problems’, Management Science 6, 197–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, H. M., 1959, Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulvey, J. M., 1994a, ‘Generating scenarios for the Towers Perrin investment system’, Research Report, Princeton Univ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulvey, J. M., 1994b, ‘Financial planning via multi-stage stochastic programs’, in: Mathematical Programming — State of the Art 1994 (Birge, J. R. and K. G. Murty, eds.), Univ. of Michigan, 151–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulvey, J. M. and H. Vladimirou, 1992, ‘Stochastic network programming for financial planning problems’, Management Science 38, 1642–1664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulvey, J. M., R. J. Vanderbei and S. A. Zenios, 1995, ‘Robust optimization of large scale systems’, Oper. Res. 43, 264–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulvey, J. M. and S. A. Zenios, 1994, ‘Capturing the correlations of fixed-income instruments’, Management Science 40, 1329–1342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, S. S. and S. A. Zenios, 1992, ‘A stochastic programming model for funding Single Premium Deferred Annuities’, Report 92–08–03, Decision Sciences Department, The Wharton School, Univ. of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; to appear in Math. Programming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serfling, R. J., 1980, Approximation Theorems in Mathematical Statistics, Wiley, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, J. F., 1988, ‘Stochastic programming models for dedicated portfolio selection’, in: Math. Models for Decision Support (Mitra, B., ed.), NATO ASI Series, Vol. F48. Springer, Berlin, 587–611.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Worzel, K. J., C. Vassiadou-Zeniou and S. A. Zenios, 1994, ‘Integrated simulation and optimization models for tracking indices of fixed-income securities’, Oper. Res. 42, 223–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zenios, S. A. (ed.), 1993, Financial Optimization, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zenios, S. A. and M. S. Shtilman, 1993, ‘Constructing optimal samples from a binomial lattice’, Journal of Information & Optimization Sciences 14, 125–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zipkin, P., 1992, ‘The structure of structured bond portfolio models’, Oper. Res. 40, S157-S169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Physica-Verlag Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dupačová, J. (1996). Uncertainty about Input Data in Portfolio Management. In: Bertocchi, M., Cavalli, E., Komlósi, S. (eds) Modelling Techniques for Financial Markets and Bank Management. Contributions to Management Science. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-51730-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-51730-3_2

  • Publisher Name: Physica-Verlag HD

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-0928-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-51730-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics