Skip to main content

Assumptions of Individual Preferences in the Theory of Voting Procedures

  • Chapter
Book cover Non-Conventional Preference Relations in Decision Making

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems ((LNE,volume 301))

Abstract

The standard assumption in the group choice theory states that the individuals in the group have complete (connected) and transitive preference relations over the set of alternatives. In this paper we shall consider some alternatives to this assumption in an effort to find out whether a theory of group choice could be built on non-conventional basic assumptions concerning individual attitudes towards options from which the group has to make a choice. We shall be dealing with a specific class of group choice procedures, viz. voting procedures (VP’s, for short). These are commonly used in determining the “socially best” alternatives either with or without preference ranking between them (for a description and analysis of the VP’s mentioned in this paper, see Nurmi [6] and Riker [8]).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aizerman, M.A. and Aleskerov, F.T., “Local operators in models of social choice”, Systems & Control Letters 3, 1–6 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aizerman, M.A. and Aleskerov, F.T., “Voting operators in the space of choice functions”, California Institute of Technology, Social Science Working Paper 559 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fishburn, P.C., “Paradoxes of Voting”, American Political Science Review 68, 537–546 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Grether, D.M. and Plott, C.R., “Economic theory of choice and the preference reversal phenomenon”, American Economic Review 69, 623–638 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A., “Prospect theory”, Econometrica 47, 263–291 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nurmi, H., “Voting procedures: a summary analysis”, British Journal of Political Science 13, 181–208 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nurmi, H., “Mathematical models of elections and their relevance for institutional design”, Electoral Studies 5, 167–181 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Riker, W.H., Liberalism against Populism, San Francisco: W.H. Freeman (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tullock, G., “Why so much stability?”, Public Choice 37, 189–202 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nurmi, H. (1988). Assumptions of Individual Preferences in the Theory of Voting Procedures. In: Kacprzyk, J., Roubens, M. (eds) Non-Conventional Preference Relations in Decision Making. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 301. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-51711-2_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-51711-2_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-18954-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-51711-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics