Skip to main content

A Neo-Austrian Two-Period Multisector Model of Capital

  • Conference paper
  • 56 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems ((LNE,volume 277))

Abstract

In the seventies there have been various attempts to revive Austrian capital theory,1 which may be classified into three groups: (1) HICKS’ [20,22]2 approach has received most attention [8,9,10,12,16,23]. But HICKS is only so far a Neo-Austrian as he takes into consideration the time-consuming nature of capital production [10]. He does, however, not use the Austrian concepts of superiority of roundabout methods, of impatience and of the period of production. (2) To the second group belong TINTNER [33], VON WEIZSÄCKER [34,35,36], REETZ [31] and FEHL [11,12,13] who resume the concept of the period of production. But as proved by the great capital controversy of the thirties [26] this is a dubious tool for the analysis of non-steady state developments (see e.g. [30]). Furthermore WICKSELL [37], ÅKERMAN [1], V.STACKELBERG [32] and VON HAYEK [17] demonstrated the possibility of deriving the conclusions of the Austrian capital theory without this concept. (3) The autors of the third group employ superiority, roundaboutness and time preference to prove that the rate of interest is positive. JAKSCH [24,25] shows in a general linear multisector model that investment implies a positive rate of interest under certain rather strong conditions. Using a weak definition of superiority he is able to show that superiority follows from efficiency and roundaboutness.

First published in Journal of Economic Theory, Vol.17, 1978, pp.38–50.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. G. Åkerman, “Realkapital und Kapitalzins,” Heft 1 und 2, Stockholm, 1923–1924.

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. Bernholz, Superiority of roundabout processes and positive rate of interest. A simple model of capital and growth, Kyklos 24 (1971), 687–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. P. Bernholz and M. Faber, Technical productivity of roundabout processes and positive rate of interest. A capital model with depreciation and n-period horizon, Z.Ges.Staatswiss. 129 (1973), 46–61.

    Google Scholar 

  4. P. Bernholz and M. Faber, A note on Stackeiberg’s hypothesis concerning a relationship between the price of land, the real rate of interest and impatience to consume, Z.Nationalökon.3 3 (1973), 375–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. P. Bernholz and M. Faber, Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der neoklassischen Betrachtungsweise für ungleichgewichtige Wachstumsprozesse. (Possibilities and limits of the neoclassical approach for non-steady-state growth paths.) Z.Ges.Staatswiss. 130 (1974), 525–532.

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. Bernholz and M. Faber, Interest Rate, Growth Rate, Roundaboutness and Impatience. A Comment on Gale and Rockwell, Discussion Paper No.2, Institut für Sozialwissenschaften, Universität Basel, December 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  7. P. Bernholz and M. Faber, Time consuming innovation and positive rate of interest, Z.Nationalökon.36 (1976), 347–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. E. Burmeister, Synthesizing the neo-Austrian and alternative approaches to capital theory: A survey, J.Econ.Lit.12 (1974), 413–456.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Faber, Die österreichische Zinstheorie und das von Neumann-Modell. (The Austrian Theory of Interest and the von Neumann-Model), Discussion Paper No.10, Department of Economics, Technical University of Berlin, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Faber, Mehrergiebigkeit und Hicks’ neuer Begriff des technischen Wandels (Superiority and Hicks’ new concept of technical change). Kyklos 28 (1975), 474–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. U. Fehl, “Produktionsfunktion und Produktionsperiode. Eine Auseinandersetzung mit dem Grundbegriff der temporalen Kapitaltheorie,” (“Production Function and the Period of Production. A Discussion of the Fundamental Concept of Temporal Capital Theory”), Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  12. U. Fehl, Technischer Fortschritt und Beschäftigung in kapitaltheoretischer Sicht.(Technical progress and employment from the view of capital theory), Z.Wirtschaftswiss.Sozialwiss. (1975), 135–170.

    Google Scholar 

  13. U. Fehl, Die durchschnittliche Produktionsperiode als Grundbegriff der temporalen Kapitaltheorie. (The average period of production as fundamental concept of temporal theory of capital), Jahr.Nationalökon.Statist. 190 (1976), 289–315.

    Google Scholar 

  14. D. Gale and R. Rockwell, On the interest rate theorems of Malinvaud and Starrett, Econometrica 43 (1975), 347–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. G. Hadley, “Linear Programming,” Addison-Wesley, Reading,Mass. Menlo Park, Calif./London/Sidney/Manila, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  16. H. Hagemann and H.D. Kurz, The return of the same truncation period and reswitching of techniques in neo-Austrian and more general models, Kyklos 29 (1976), 678–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. F.A.v. Hayek, “The Pure Theory of Capital,” Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  18. J.R. Hicks, “Value and Capital,” Oxford Univ.Press, New York/London, 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  19. J.R. Hicks, “Capital and Growth,” Oxford Univ.Press, New York/London, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  20. J.R. Hicks, The neo-Austrian growth theory, The Economic Journal 90 (1970), 257–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. J.R. Hicks, Die österreichische Kapitaltheorie und ihre Wiedergeburt in der modernen Wirtschaftswissenschaft. (The Austrian capital theory and its renaissance in modern economics), Z.Nationalökon. 32 (1972), 91–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. J.R. Hicks, “Capital and Time: A Neo-Austrian Theory,” Oxford Univ.Press, New York/London, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  23. E. Heuss, Das Versagen der deutschsprachigen Wirtschaftstheorie, Bemerkungen zu ‘Capital and Time’ von J. Hicks. (The failure of the German speaking economic theory. Remarks to ‘Capital and Time’ by J. Hicks), Ordo 26 (1975), 291–297.

    Google Scholar 

  24. H.J. Jaksch, Die Mehrergiebigkeit längerer Produktionsumwege in einem linearen Vielsektorenmodell. (Superiority of roundabout processes in a linear multisector-model), Z.Ges.Staatswiss. 131 (1975), 92–105.

    Google Scholar 

  25. H.J. Jaksch, Effizienz und Minderschätzung künftiger Bedürfnisse in einem linearen Vielsektorenmodell. (Efficiency and Impatience to Consume in a Linear Multisector Model), in “Dynamische Wirtschaftsanalyse,” edited by (O. Becker und R. Richter, Eds.) J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), Tübingen, 1975, 87–104.

    Google Scholar 

  26. N. Kaldor, Annual survey of economic theory: The recent controversy on the theory of capital, Econometrica 5 (1937), 201–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. T.C. Koopmans, Allocation of Resources and the Price System, in “Three Essays on the State of Economic Sciences,” pp.1–126, McGraw-Hill, New York/Toronto/London, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  28. T.C. Koopmans, Stationary ordinal utility and impatience, Econometrica 28 (1960), 287–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. F.A. Lutz, “Zinstheorie,” 2nd.ed., J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), Tübingen, Zürich, 1967. English translation: “The Theory of Interest,” Chicago, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  30. O. Morgenstern, Zur Theorie der Produktionsperiode. (On the theory of production period), Z.Nationalökon. 6 (1935), 196–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. N. Reetz, “Produktionsfunktion und Produktionsperiode.” Kritische Darstellung des Produktionsperiodenmodells Böhm-Bawerkschen Typs und Vergleich mit der neoklassischen Wachstumstheorie (“Production Function and Production Period. Critical Representation of the Production Period-Model of Böhm-Bawerk and Comparision with the Neoclassical Growth Theory”), Göttingen, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  32. H.V. Stackelberg, Kapital und Zins in der stationären Verkehrswirtschaft. (Capital and interest in the stationary economy), Z.Nationalökon. 10 (1941/43), 25–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. G. Tintner, Lineare Methoden der Nationalökonomie und die Produktionsperiode von Böhm-Bawerk. (Linear methods in economics and the period of production of Böhm-Bawerk), Z.Nationalökon.30 (1970), 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. C.C.V. Weizsäcker, “Steady State Capital Theory,” Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York, 1971.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  35. C.C.v. Weizsäcker, Die zeitliche Struktur des Produktionsprozesses und das Problem der Einkommensverteilung zwischen Kapital und Arbeit. (The time structure of the production process and the problem of income distribution between capital and labor), Weitwirtsch.Arch. 106 (1971), 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. C.C.v. Weizsäcker, Substitution along the time axis, Kyklos 27 (1974), 732–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. K. Wicksell, “Lectures on Political Economy,” Vol.1, General Theory, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1967; first German ed., 1913.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bernholz, P., Faber, M., Reiss, W. (1986). A Neo-Austrian Two-Period Multisector Model of Capital. In: Faber, M. (eds) Studies in Austrian Capital Theory, Investment and Time. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 277. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-51701-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-51701-3_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-16804-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-51701-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics