Abstract
Capital theory is notoriously known to be a field of controversies not few of which are due to misunderstandings. There are, for example, many articles and books which deal with the two Cambridge schools. As far as I know there is no paper dealing with relationships between the Austrian and SRAFFA’s capital theory. Since I have repeatedly been questioned on this topic I will try to fill some part of this gap. In Section 2 I outline our approach of modern Austrian capital theory and in Section 3 I give a brief introduction to SRAFFA’s book PRODUCTION OF COMMODITIES BY MEANS OF COMMODITIES (SRAFFA [1960]), which will be the basis of our comparison with the neo-Austrian capital theory in Secton 4.
I am grateful to PETER BERNHOLZ (Basel), FRIEDRICH BREYER, ALEXANDER GERYBADZE, JOHANN IRSIGLER, HANS-JÜRGEN JAKSCH, WINFRIED REISS, GUNTER STEPHAN (Heidelberg), PETER FLASCHEL, KIAUS JAEGER (Berlin), HARALD HAGEMANN, H.D. KURZ (Kiel), DIETER RENNING (Turlock, Cal.), S.ZAMAGNIE (Bologna) for critical comments. Of course, I assume full responsibility for anv errors. First published in: Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft 136, 1980, pp. 617–629.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Arrow, K.J. and D.A. Starrett, [1973], “Cost and Demand-Theoretical Approaches to the Theory of Price Determination,” in: J.R. Hicks and W. Weber (eds.), Carl Menger and the Austrian School of Economics, Oxford/129–148.
Atlantic Economic Journal 6, No.3, September [19 78]. (This volume contains solely papers on Carl Menger.)
Beckmann, M.J.[1971], “The Period of Production in a von Neumann Model/” Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie, Suppl.1,3–10.
Bernholz, P. [1971], “Superiority of Roundabout Processes and Positive Rate of Interest. A Simple Model of Capital and Growth,” Kyklos, 24, 687–721.
Bernholz, P. [1972], Grundlagen der Politischen Ökonomie, Vol.1, Tübingen.
Bernholz, P. and M. Faber, [1973], “Technical Productivity of Roundabout Processes and Positive Rate of Interest. A Capital Model with Depreciation and η-Period Horizon,” Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft, 129, 46–61.
Bernholz, P. and M. Faber [1978], “Steady State and Superiority of Roundaboutness: A Comparison between the Neoclassical and a Neo-Austrian Approach,” Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft, 134, 703–711.
Bernholz, P., M. Faber, and W. Reiss [1978], “A Neo-Austrian Two Period Multi-Sector Model of Capital,” Journal of Economic Theory, 17, 38–50. (Reprinted in this volume.)
Böge, W., M. Faber and W. Güth [1982], “A Dynamic Game with Macroeconomic Investment Decisions under Alternative Market Structure,” in: Games, Economic Dynamics, and Time Series Analysis, Physica-Verlag Wien, Würzburg, 227–250. (Reprinted in this volume.)
Böhm-Bawerk, E.v. [1962], “Macht oder ökonomisches Gesetz?”, Zeitschrift für Volkswirtschaft, Sozialpolitik und Verwaltung, 23, 1914, 205–271. (Translated into English: “Control or Economic Law?,” in: Shorter Classics of Böhm-Bawerk, Libertarian Press 1962.
Böhm-Bawerk, E.v. [1921], Positive Theorie des Kapitals, Volume 1, 4th edition, Jena.
Borch, K. [1973], “The Place of Uncertainty in Theories of the Austrian School,” in: J.R. Hicks and W. Weber (eds.), Carl Menger and the Austrian School of Economics, Oxford 61–74.
Bruno, M., E. Burmeister, and E. Sheshinski [1966], “The Nature and Implications of the Reswitching of Techniques,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80, 526–553.
Burmeister, E. [1968], “On a Theorem of Sraffa,” Economica, 35, 83–87.
Burmeister, E. [1974], “Synthesizing the Neo-Austrian and Alternative Approaches to Capital Theory: A Survey,” Journal of Economic Literature, 12, 413–456.
Burmeister, E. [1975], “A Comment on ‘This Age of Leontief... and Who?’,” Journal of Economic Literature, 13, 454–457.
Burmeister, E. [1977], “The Irrelevance of Sraffa’s Analysis without Constant Returns to Scale,” Journal of Economic Literature, 15, 68–72.
Eatwell, J. [1977], “The Irrelevance of Returns to Scale in Sraffa’s Analysis,” Journal of Economic Literature, 15, 61–67.
Faber, M. [1973], “Einstimmigkeitsregel und Einkommensumverteilung,” Kyklos, 26, 836–857.
Faber, M. [1979], Introduction to Modem Austrian Capital Theory, Lecture Notes in Economies and Mathematical Systems, 167, Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.
Fehl, U. [1973], Produktionsfunktion und Produktionsperiode. Eine Auseinandersetzung mit dem Grundbegriff der temporalen Kapitaltheorie, Göttingen.
Fehl, U. [1975], “Technischer Fortschritt und Beschäftigung in kapitaltheoretischer Sicht,” Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts-und Sozialwissenschaften, 95, 135–170.
Fehl, U. [1976], “Die durchschnittliche Produktionsperiode als Grundbegriff der temporalen Kapitaltheorie,” Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, 190, 289–315.
Gram, H.N. and V.C. Walsh [1978], “Menger and Jevons in the Setting of Post-von Neumann-Sraffa Economics,” Atlantic Economic Journal, 6, 46–56.
Hagemann, H. and H.-D. Kurz [1976], “The Return of the Same Truncation Period and Reswitching of Techniques in Neo-Austrian and More General Models,” Kyklos, 29, 678–708.
Harcourt, G.C. [1972], Some Cambridge Controversies in the Theory of Capital, Cambridge.
Hicks, J.R. [1970], “The Neo-Austrian Growth Theory,” The Economic Journal, 80, 257–281.
Hicks, J.R. [1973], Capital and Time. A Neo-Austrian Theory, Oxford.
Hicks, J.R. [1973a], “The Austrian Theory of Capital and its Rebirth in Modern Economics,” in: J.R. Hicks and W. Weber (eds.), Carl Menger and the Austrian School of Economics, Oxford, 190–206.
Hicks, J.R. [1976], “Some Questions of Time in Economics,” in: A.M. Tang, F.M. Westfield and J.S. Worley (eds.), Evolution, Welfare, Time in Economics, Toronto, 135–151.
Hicks, J.R. and W. Weber (eds.) [1973], Carl Menger and the Austrian School of Economics, Oxford.
Howard, M.C. [1980], “Austrian Capital Theory: An Evaluation in Terms of Piero Sraffa’s Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities,” Metroeconomica, 32, 1–23.
Jaksch, H.J. [1975a], “Die Mehrergiebigkeit längerer Produktionsumwege in einem linearen Vielsektorenmodell,” Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft, 131, 92–105.
Jaksch, H.J. [1975b], “Effizienz und Minderschätzung künftiger Bedürfnisse in einem linearen Vielsektorenmodell,” 87–104, in: O. Becker und R. Richter (eds.), Dynamische Wirtschaftsanalyse, Heinz Sauermann zum 70.Geburtstag, Tübingen.
Kirzner, J.M. [1978], “The Entrepreneurial Role in Menger’s System,” Atlantic Economic Journal, 6, 31–45.
Levine, A.L. [1974], “This Age of Leontief... and Who? An Interpretation,” Journal of Economic Literature, 12, 872–881.
Levine, A.L. [1975], “This Age of Leontief... and Who? A Reply,” Journal of Economic Literature, 13, 457–461.
Levine, A.L. [1977], “The Irrelevance of Returns to Scale in Sraffa’s Analysis: A Comment,” Journal of Economic Literature, 15, 70–72.
Maier, G. [1984], Rohstoffe und Innovation. Eine dynamische Untersuchung, Mathematical Systems in Economics, Vol.89, Verlagsgruppe Athenäum, Hain, Hanstein.
Menger, C. [1923], Grundsätze der Volkswirtschaftslehre, 2nd. ed., Leipzig.
Menger, K. [1934], “Das Unsicherheitsmoment in der Wertlehre,” Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie, 5, 459–485.
Miyao, T. [1977], “A Generalization of Sraffa’s Standard Commodity and its Complete Characterization,” International Economic Review, 18, 151–166.
Moss, L.S. [1978], “Carl Menger’s Theory of Exchange Atlantic,” Economic Journal, 6, 17–30.
Nell, E.J. [1971], “Theories of Growth and Theories of Value,” in: G.C. Harcourt and N.F. Laing (eds.), Capital and Growth, Harmondsworth, 196–210.
Newman, P. [1962], “Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities,” Schweizer Zeitschrift für Volkswirtschaft und Statistik, 98, 58–75.
Orosel, G.O. [1979], “A Reformulation of the Austrian Theory of Capital and its Application to the Debate on Reswitching and Related Paradoxa,” Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie, 39, 1–31.
Pasinetti, L. [1959/60], “A Mathematical Formulation of the Ricardian System,” Review of Economic Studies, 27, 78–98.
Pasinetti, L. [1977], Lectures on the Theory of Production, New York.
Reetz, N. [1971], Produktionsfunktion und Produktionsperiode. Kritische Darstellung des Produktionsperiodenmodells Böhm-Bawerkschen Typs und Vergleich mit der neoklassischen Wachstumstheorie, Göttingen.
Reetz, N. [1976], Zeitlicher Produktionsablauf und Kapitalakkumulation, Göttingen.
Reiss, W. [1979], “Substitution in a Neo-Austrian Model of Capital,” Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie, 39, 33–51.
Reiss, W. and M. Faber [1982], “Own Rates of Interest in a General Multisector Model of Capital,” in: M. Deistler, E. Fürst, and G. Schwödiauer (eds.), Games, Economic Dynamics, and Time Series Analysis, Physica-Verlag, Wien, Würzburg, 194–209. (Reprinted in this volume.)
Ricardo, D. [1817], On the Priciples of Political Economy and Taxation, London.
Robinson, J. [1960a], “The Rate of Interest,” in: J. Robinson, Collected Economic Papers, Vol.2, Oxford, 246–265.
Robinson, J. [1960b], “Prelude to a Critique of Economic Theory,” in: J. Robinson, Collected Economic Papers, Vols.3, Oxford, 7–14.
Robinson, J. [1965], “Solow on the Rate of Return,” in: J. Robinson: Collected Economic Papers, Vol.3, Oxford, 36–47.
Rothschild, K.W. [1973], “Distributive Aspects of the Austrian Theory,” in: J.R. Hicks and W. Weber (eds.), Carl Menger and the Austrian School of Economics, Oxford, 205–225.
Schefold, B. [1976], “Einige Grundthesen des Buchs, mathematisch formuliert,” in: P. Sraffa, Warenproduktion mittels Waren, Nachworte von B.Schefold, Frankfurt a.M.
Schefold, B. [1978], “On Counting Equations,” Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie, 38, 253–285.
Schefold, B. [1980], “Von Neumann and Sraffa: Mathematical Equivalence and Conceptual Difference,” Economic Journal, 90, 140–156.
Sraffa, P. (ed.) [1951], The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, Cambridge.
Sraffa, P. [1960], Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities. Prelude to Critique of Economic Theory, Cambridge.
Streissler, E. [1969], “Structural Economic Thought. On the Significance of the Austrian School today,” Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie, 29, 237–266.
Streissler, E. [1972], “To what Extent Was the Austrian School Marginalist?,” History of Political Economy, 4, 426–441.
Tintner, E. [1970], “Lineare Methoden der Nationalökonomie und die Produktionsperiode von Böhm-Bawerk,” Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie, 30, 1–5.
Weizsäcker, C.C.v. [1971a], Steady State Capital Theory, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.
Weizsäcker, C.C.v. [1971b], “Die zeitliche Struktur des Produktionsprozesses und das Problem der Einkommensverteilung zwischen Kapital und Arbeit,” Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 106, 1–33.
Weizsäcker, C.C.v. [1974], “Substitution Along the Time Axis,” Kyklos, 27, 732–756.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1986 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Faber, M. (1986). Relationships between Modern Austrian and SRAFFA’s Capital Theory. In: Faber, M. (eds) Studies in Austrian Capital Theory, Investment and Time. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 277. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-51701-3_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-51701-3_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-16804-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-51701-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive