Skip to main content

Relationships between Modern Austrian and SRAFFA’s Capital Theory

  • Conference paper
Studies in Austrian Capital Theory, Investment and Time

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems ((LNE,volume 277))

  • 59 Accesses

Abstract

Capital theory is notoriously known to be a field of controversies not few of which are due to misunderstandings. There are, for example, many articles and books which deal with the two Cambridge schools. As far as I know there is no paper dealing with relationships between the Austrian and SRAFFA’s capital theory. Since I have repeatedly been questioned on this topic I will try to fill some part of this gap. In Section 2 I outline our approach of modern Austrian capital theory and in Section 3 I give a brief introduction to SRAFFA’s book PRODUCTION OF COMMODITIES BY MEANS OF COMMODITIES (SRAFFA [1960]), which will be the basis of our comparison with the neo-Austrian capital theory in Secton 4.

I am grateful to PETER BERNHOLZ (Basel), FRIEDRICH BREYER, ALEXANDER GERYBADZE, JOHANN IRSIGLER, HANS-JÜRGEN JAKSCH, WINFRIED REISS, GUNTER STEPHAN (Heidelberg), PETER FLASCHEL, KIAUS JAEGER (Berlin), HARALD HAGEMANN, H.D. KURZ (Kiel), DIETER RENNING (Turlock, Cal.), S.ZAMAGNIE (Bologna) for critical comments. Of course, I assume full responsibility for anv errors. First published in: Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft 136, 1980, pp. 617–629.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arrow, K.J. and D.A. Starrett, [1973], “Cost and Demand-Theoretical Approaches to the Theory of Price Determination,” in: J.R. Hicks and W. Weber (eds.), Carl Menger and the Austrian School of Economics, Oxford/129–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atlantic Economic Journal 6, No.3, September [19 78]. (This volume contains solely papers on Carl Menger.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckmann, M.J.[1971], “The Period of Production in a von Neumann Model/” Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie, Suppl.1,3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernholz, P. [1971], “Superiority of Roundabout Processes and Positive Rate of Interest. A Simple Model of Capital and Growth,” Kyklos, 24, 687–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernholz, P. [1972], Grundlagen der Politischen Ökonomie, Vol.1, Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernholz, P. and M. Faber, [1973], “Technical Productivity of Roundabout Processes and Positive Rate of Interest. A Capital Model with Depreciation and η-Period Horizon,” Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft, 129, 46–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernholz, P. and M. Faber [1978], “Steady State and Superiority of Roundaboutness: A Comparison between the Neoclassical and a Neo-Austrian Approach,” Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft, 134, 703–711.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernholz, P., M. Faber, and W. Reiss [1978], “A Neo-Austrian Two Period Multi-Sector Model of Capital,” Journal of Economic Theory, 17, 38–50. (Reprinted in this volume.)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Böge, W., M. Faber and W. Güth [1982], “A Dynamic Game with Macroeconomic Investment Decisions under Alternative Market Structure,” in: Games, Economic Dynamics, and Time Series Analysis, Physica-Verlag Wien, Würzburg, 227–250. (Reprinted in this volume.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Böhm-Bawerk, E.v. [1962], “Macht oder ökonomisches Gesetz?”, Zeitschrift für Volkswirtschaft, Sozialpolitik und Verwaltung, 23, 1914, 205–271. (Translated into English: “Control or Economic Law?,” in: Shorter Classics of Böhm-Bawerk, Libertarian Press 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Böhm-Bawerk, E.v. [1921], Positive Theorie des Kapitals, Volume 1, 4th edition, Jena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borch, K. [1973], “The Place of Uncertainty in Theories of the Austrian School,” in: J.R. Hicks and W. Weber (eds.), Carl Menger and the Austrian School of Economics, Oxford 61–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruno, M., E. Burmeister, and E. Sheshinski [1966], “The Nature and Implications of the Reswitching of Techniques,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80, 526–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burmeister, E. [1968], “On a Theorem of Sraffa,” Economica, 35, 83–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burmeister, E. [1974], “Synthesizing the Neo-Austrian and Alternative Approaches to Capital Theory: A Survey,” Journal of Economic Literature, 12, 413–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burmeister, E. [1975], “A Comment on ‘This Age of Leontief... and Who?’,” Journal of Economic Literature, 13, 454–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burmeister, E. [1977], “The Irrelevance of Sraffa’s Analysis without Constant Returns to Scale,” Journal of Economic Literature, 15, 68–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eatwell, J. [1977], “The Irrelevance of Returns to Scale in Sraffa’s Analysis,” Journal of Economic Literature, 15, 61–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faber, M. [1973], “Einstimmigkeitsregel und Einkommensumverteilung,” Kyklos, 26, 836–857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faber, M. [1979], Introduction to Modem Austrian Capital Theory, Lecture Notes in Economies and Mathematical Systems, 167, Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fehl, U. [1973], Produktionsfunktion und Produktionsperiode. Eine Auseinandersetzung mit dem Grundbegriff der temporalen Kapitaltheorie, Göttingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehl, U. [1975], “Technischer Fortschritt und Beschäftigung in kapitaltheoretischer Sicht,” Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts-und Sozialwissenschaften, 95, 135–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehl, U. [1976], “Die durchschnittliche Produktionsperiode als Grundbegriff der temporalen Kapitaltheorie,” Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, 190, 289–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gram, H.N. and V.C. Walsh [1978], “Menger and Jevons in the Setting of Post-von Neumann-Sraffa Economics,” Atlantic Economic Journal, 6, 46–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagemann, H. and H.-D. Kurz [1976], “The Return of the Same Truncation Period and Reswitching of Techniques in Neo-Austrian and More General Models,” Kyklos, 29, 678–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harcourt, G.C. [1972], Some Cambridge Controversies in the Theory of Capital, Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, J.R. [1970], “The Neo-Austrian Growth Theory,” The Economic Journal, 80, 257–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, J.R. [1973], Capital and Time. A Neo-Austrian Theory, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, J.R. [1973a], “The Austrian Theory of Capital and its Rebirth in Modern Economics,” in: J.R. Hicks and W. Weber (eds.), Carl Menger and the Austrian School of Economics, Oxford, 190–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, J.R. [1976], “Some Questions of Time in Economics,” in: A.M. Tang, F.M. Westfield and J.S. Worley (eds.), Evolution, Welfare, Time in Economics, Toronto, 135–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, J.R. and W. Weber (eds.) [1973], Carl Menger and the Austrian School of Economics, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, M.C. [1980], “Austrian Capital Theory: An Evaluation in Terms of Piero Sraffa’s Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities,” Metroeconomica, 32, 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaksch, H.J. [1975a], “Die Mehrergiebigkeit längerer Produktionsumwege in einem linearen Vielsektorenmodell,” Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft, 131, 92–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaksch, H.J. [1975b], “Effizienz und Minderschätzung künftiger Bedürfnisse in einem linearen Vielsektorenmodell,” 87–104, in: O. Becker und R. Richter (eds.), Dynamische Wirtschaftsanalyse, Heinz Sauermann zum 70.Geburtstag, Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, J.M. [1978], “The Entrepreneurial Role in Menger’s System,” Atlantic Economic Journal, 6, 31–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, A.L. [1974], “This Age of Leontief... and Who? An Interpretation,” Journal of Economic Literature, 12, 872–881.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, A.L. [1975], “This Age of Leontief... and Who? A Reply,” Journal of Economic Literature, 13, 457–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, A.L. [1977], “The Irrelevance of Returns to Scale in Sraffa’s Analysis: A Comment,” Journal of Economic Literature, 15, 70–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maier, G. [1984], Rohstoffe und Innovation. Eine dynamische Untersuchung, Mathematical Systems in Economics, Vol.89, Verlagsgruppe Athenäum, Hain, Hanstein.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menger, C. [1923], Grundsätze der Volkswirtschaftslehre, 2nd. ed., Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menger, K. [1934], “Das Unsicherheitsmoment in der Wertlehre,” Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie, 5, 459–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miyao, T. [1977], “A Generalization of Sraffa’s Standard Commodity and its Complete Characterization,” International Economic Review, 18, 151–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss, L.S. [1978], “Carl Menger’s Theory of Exchange Atlantic,” Economic Journal, 6, 17–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nell, E.J. [1971], “Theories of Growth and Theories of Value,” in: G.C. Harcourt and N.F. Laing (eds.), Capital and Growth, Harmondsworth, 196–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, P. [1962], “Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities,” Schweizer Zeitschrift für Volkswirtschaft und Statistik, 98, 58–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orosel, G.O. [1979], “A Reformulation of the Austrian Theory of Capital and its Application to the Debate on Reswitching and Related Paradoxa,” Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie, 39, 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasinetti, L. [1959/60], “A Mathematical Formulation of the Ricardian System,” Review of Economic Studies, 27, 78–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasinetti, L. [1977], Lectures on the Theory of Production, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reetz, N. [1971], Produktionsfunktion und Produktionsperiode. Kritische Darstellung des Produktionsperiodenmodells Böhm-Bawerkschen Typs und Vergleich mit der neoklassischen Wachstumstheorie, Göttingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reetz, N. [1976], Zeitlicher Produktionsablauf und Kapitalakkumulation, Göttingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, W. [1979], “Substitution in a Neo-Austrian Model of Capital,” Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie, 39, 33–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, W. and M. Faber [1982], “Own Rates of Interest in a General Multisector Model of Capital,” in: M. Deistler, E. Fürst, and G. Schwödiauer (eds.), Games, Economic Dynamics, and Time Series Analysis, Physica-Verlag, Wien, Würzburg, 194–209. (Reprinted in this volume.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricardo, D. [1817], On the Priciples of Political Economy and Taxation, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. [1960a], “The Rate of Interest,” in: J. Robinson, Collected Economic Papers, Vol.2, Oxford, 246–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. [1960b], “Prelude to a Critique of Economic Theory,” in: J. Robinson, Collected Economic Papers, Vols.3, Oxford, 7–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. [1965], “Solow on the Rate of Return,” in: J. Robinson: Collected Economic Papers, Vol.3, Oxford, 36–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, K.W. [1973], “Distributive Aspects of the Austrian Theory,” in: J.R. Hicks and W. Weber (eds.), Carl Menger and the Austrian School of Economics, Oxford, 205–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schefold, B. [1976], “Einige Grundthesen des Buchs, mathematisch formuliert,” in: P. Sraffa, Warenproduktion mittels Waren, Nachworte von B.Schefold, Frankfurt a.M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schefold, B. [1978], “On Counting Equations,” Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie, 38, 253–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schefold, B. [1980], “Von Neumann and Sraffa: Mathematical Equivalence and Conceptual Difference,” Economic Journal, 90, 140–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sraffa, P. (ed.) [1951], The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sraffa, P. [1960], Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities. Prelude to Critique of Economic Theory, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streissler, E. [1969], “Structural Economic Thought. On the Significance of the Austrian School today,” Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie, 29, 237–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Streissler, E. [1972], “To what Extent Was the Austrian School Marginalist?,” History of Political Economy, 4, 426–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tintner, E. [1970], “Lineare Methoden der Nationalökonomie und die Produktionsperiode von Böhm-Bawerk,” Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie, 30, 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weizsäcker, C.C.v. [1971a], Steady State Capital Theory, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weizsäcker, C.C.v. [1971b], “Die zeitliche Struktur des Produktionsprozesses und das Problem der Einkommensverteilung zwischen Kapital und Arbeit,” Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 106, 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weizsäcker, C.C.v. [1974], “Substitution Along the Time Axis,” Kyklos, 27, 732–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Faber, M. (1986). Relationships between Modern Austrian and SRAFFA’s Capital Theory. In: Faber, M. (eds) Studies in Austrian Capital Theory, Investment and Time. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 277. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-51701-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-51701-3_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-16804-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-51701-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics