Skip to main content

On Paradoxes and Progress in Theoretical Immunology, and Evidence for a New Symmetry

  • Conference paper
Immunology and Epidemiology

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Biomathematics ((LNBM,volume 65))

Abstract

A view is offered on how we might collectively and perhaps objectively judge which of a variety of theories of regulation are the best, and thus decide which theories should be adopted as standard models for more detailed work. A new theoretical symmetry relationship is then presented for pairs of anti-sera of the type A anti-B and B anti-A, together with experimental evidence validating the relationship. The evidence includes a new phenomenon relevant to transplantation immunology, that we call “reverse enhancement”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. “Paradoxes in Immunology”, G. W. Hoffmann, J.G. Levy and G.T. Nepom, Editors, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, 1986. (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jerne, N.K. “Towards a network theory of the immune system”. Ann. Immunol., 125C (1974) 373–389.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Richter, P.H. “A network theory of the immune response”. Eur. J. Immunol. 5, 350–354 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ivanov, V.V., Janenko, V.M., Fontalin, L.N. and Nesterenko, V.G. “Modelling of idiotype-anti-idiotypic interactions of immune network with regard to distinctive subpopulations among lymphocytes” in “Mathematical Modelling in Immunology and Medicine”. G.I. Marchuk and L.N. Belykh, Editors, North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam 1983, pp. 141–149.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Herzenberg, L.A., Black, S.J. and Herzenberg, L.A. “Regulatory circuits and antibody responses”. Eur. J. Immunol. 10, 1–11, 1980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hoffmann, G.W. “On Network Theory and H-2 Restriction”, in Contemporary Topics in Immunology (N. Warner, Ed.) vol. 11, 1980, pp. 185–226.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Hoffmann, G.W. and Cooper-Willis, A. “Symmetry, complexity and stability in immune system network theory” in “Mathematical Modelling in Immunology and Medicine”, G.I. Marchuk and L.N. Belykh, Editors, North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1983, pp. 31–42.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Günther, N. and Hoffmann, G.W. “Qualitative dynamics of a network model of regulation of the immune system: A rationale for the IgM to IgG switch”. J. Theoret. Biol. 44, 815–855 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jerne, N.K. “Clonal selection in a lymphocyte network” in “Cellular Selection and Regulation in the Immune Response”, G.M. Edelman, Ed., Raven Press, New York, 1974 pp. 39–48.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hoffmann, G.W. “The Application of Stability Criteria in Evaluating Network Regulation Models”, in “Regulation of Immune Response Dynamics”, C. DeLisi and J.R.J. Hiernaux (Eds.), CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, 1982 pp. 137–162.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Spouge, J.L. “Increasing stability with complexity in a system composed of unstable subsystems”. J. Math. Analysis and Applications, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Urbain, J., Wailmart, C. and Cazenave, P.A. “Idiotypic regulation in immune networks” In Contemp. Topics in Molecular Immunology, vol. 8, eds. Inwan, F.P. and Mandy, W.J., pp. 113–148, Plenum Press, New York, 1981.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Cooper-Willis, A. and Hoffmann, G.W. “Symmetry of effector function in the immune system network”. Mol. Immunol. 20 (8), 865–870, 1983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Steinmetz, M., Minard, K., Horvath, S., McNicholas, J., Frelinger, J., Wake C., Mack, B. and Hood, L. “A molecular map of the immune response region from the major histocompatibility complex of the mouse”. Nature (London) 300, 35–42, 1982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Klein, J. and Nagy, Z.A. “Trouble in the J-land”. Nature (London) 300, 12–13, 1982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Munro, A. “The I-J paradox remains unsolved”. Nature (London) 306, 537–538, 1983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sachs, D.L., Lynch, D.H. and Epstein, S.L. “The I-J dilemma: new developments”. Immunology Today, 5, 94–95, 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Schrader, J.W. “Nature of the T cell receptor. Both T cell receptor and antigen-specific T cell derived factors are coded for by V genes, but express anti-self idiotypes indirectly determined by major histocompatibility genes”. Scand. J. Immunol. 10, 387–393, 1979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tada, T. “Are there unique I region-controlled determinants on T cells?” in “Paradoxes in Immunology”, Hoffmann, G.W., Nepom, G.T. and Levy, J.G., eds., CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Carpenter, C.B., d’Apice, A.J.F., Abbas, A.K. “The Role of Antibodies in the Rejection and Enhancement of Organ Allografts”. Advances in Immunol. 22, 1, 1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Voisin, G.A. “Role of antibody classes in the regulatory facilitation reaction”. Immunol. Reviews, 49, 3, 1980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Morris, P.J. “Suppression of rejection of organ allografts by alloantibody”. Immunol. Rev., 49., 93, 1980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ramseier, H. and Lindenmann, J. “Aliotypic antibodies”. Transpl. Rev. 10, 57–96, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Binz, H. and Wigzell, H. “Shared idiotypic determinants on B and T lymphocytes reactive against the same antigenic determinants. I. Demonstration of similar or identical idiotypes on IgG molecules and T cell receptors with specificity for the same alloantigens”. J. Exp. Med. 142, 197–211.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hoffmann, G.W., Cooper-Willis, A., Chow, M. (1986). On Paradoxes and Progress in Theoretical Immunology, and Evidence for a New Symmetry. In: Hoffmann, G.W., Hraba, T. (eds) Immunology and Epidemiology. Lecture Notes in Biomathematics, vol 65. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-51691-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-51691-7_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-16431-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-51691-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics