Advertisement

On Perfectly Competitive Economies: Loeb Economies

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems book series (LNE, volume 244)

Abstract

An exchange economy consists of a set of economic agents, each of whom is characterized by an endowment of goods and a “preference ordering” over all possible combinations of goods, who engage in the exchange of commodities so as to make themselves as well off as possible. This process of exchange is said to take place under perfect competition if, and only if, no agent is able to influence the terms of trade in other agents1 transactions. If the terms of trade are expressed via prices for the commodities, and if agents1 actions result in “market clearing”, i.e., in equality between the aggregate demand and aggregate supply for each commodity, then a competitive equilibrium is said to exist.

Keywords

Measure Space Exchange Economy Competitive Equilibrium Internal Mapping Perfect Competition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, R. M. (1982), “Star-Finite Representation of Measure Spaces”, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 271:667–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, R. M. (1978), “An Elementary Core Equivalence Theorem”, Econometrica 46:1483–1487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, R. M. (1976), “A Non-Standard Representation for Brownian Motion and Itô Integration”, Israel Journal of Mathematics 25:15–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson, R. M., M. Alikhan and S. Rashid (1982), “Approximate Equilibria With Bounds Independent of Preferences”, Review of Economic Studies XLIV: 473–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arrow, K., and G. Debreu (1954), “Existence of Equilibrium for a Competitive Economy”, Econometrica 22:265–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Aumann, R. J. (1964), “Markets With a Continuum of Traders”, Econometrica 32:29–50.Google Scholar
  7. Aumann, R. J. (1966), “Existence of a Competitive Equilibria in Markets With a Continuum of Traders”, Econometrica 34:1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, D. J., and A. Robinson (1975), “Nonstandard Exchange Economies”, Econometrica 43:41–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown, D. J., and L. M. Lewis (1981), “Existence of Equilibrium in a Hyperfinite Exchange Economy”, Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper #581.Google Scholar
  10. Cutland, N. J. (1983), “Nonstandard Measure Theory and its Applications”, Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society 15:529–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dunford, N., and J. Schwartz (1957), Linear Operators, Part I: General Theory (New York: Interscience Publishers).Google Scholar
  12. Emmons, D. W. (1984), “Existence of Lindahl Equilibria for Measure Theoretic Economies Without Ordered Preferences”, Journal of Economic Theory 34:342–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Foley, K. D. (1970), “Lindahl’s Solution and the Core of an Economy With Public Goods”, Econometrica 30:66–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gale, D., and A. Mas-Colell (1975), “An Equilibrium Existence Theorem for a General Model Without Ordered Preferences”, Journal of Mathematical Economics 6:9–15;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gale, D., and A. Mas-Colell (1975), “An Equilibrium Existence Theorem for a General Model Without Ordered Preferences”, Journal of Mathematical Economics 6:297–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hildenbrand, W. (1974), Core and Equilibria of a Large Economy (Princeton; Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
  17. Khan, M. Ali (1975), “Some Approximate Equilibria”, Journal of Mathematical Economics 2:63–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Loeb, P. (1979), “An Introduction to Non-Standard Analysis and Hyperfinite Probability Theory”, Probabilistic Analysis and Related Topics, Volume 2, edited by A. T. Bharucha-Reid (New York: Academic Press), pp. 105–142.Google Scholar
  19. Loeb, P. (1975), “Conversion From Non-Standard to Standard Measure Spaces and Applications to Probability Theory”, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 211:113–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McKenzie, L. W. (1954), “On Equilibrium in Graham’s Model of World Trade and Other Competitive Systems”, Econometrica 22:14 7–161.Google Scholar
  21. Rashid, S. (1979), “The Relationship Between Measure-Theoretic and Non-Standard Exchange Economies”, Journal of Mathematical Economics 5:195–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Roberts, D. J. (1972), “Existence of a Lindahl Equilibrium With a Measure Space of Consumers”, Journal of Economic Theory 6:355–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Robinson, A. (1974), Non-Standard Analysis (revised edition) (New York: North Holland).Google Scholar
  24. Schmeidler, D. (1969), “Competitive Equilibria in Markets with a Continuum of Traders and Incomplete Preferences”, Econometrica 37:578–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Stroyan, K. D. and W. A. J. Luxemburg (1976), Introduction to the Theory of Infinitesimals (New York: Academic Press).Google Scholar
  26. Yannelis, N. C. (1983), “Solution Concepts in Economic Theory”, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Rochester.Google Scholar
  27. Yannelis, N. C. (1984), “Value and Fairness”, in Advances in Equilibrium Theory, edited by C. D. Aliprantis, O. Burkinshaw and N. J. Rothman, Springer-Verlag Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, 1985.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsWayne State UniversityDetroitUSA
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations