Zusammenfassung
Während der ersten 50 Jahre nach Einführung des Konzepts der therapeutischen Allianz (Freud 1912) schienen lediglich die klinischen Methoden ausreichenden Erklärungsgehalt für dieses Konzept bieten zu können. Während der nächsten 30 Jahre und darunter wiederum besonders während der letzten 15 Jahre haben die klinisch-quantitativen Methoden Schritt für Schritt einen zunehmend größeren Erklärungsbeitrag leisten können.
Übersetzung von Dipl. Psych. Dieter Benninghoven, Göttingen
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literatur
Alexander L, Luborsky L (1986) Research on the helping alliance. In: Greenberg L, Pinsof W (eds) The psychotherapeutic process: A research handbook. Guilford, New York, pp 325–366
Bachelor A (1990) Comparison and relationship to outcome of diverse dimenions of the Helping Alliance as seen by client and therapist. Paper at the meeting of the Society for Psychotherapy Research. Wintergreen VA
Barrett-Lennard G (1962) Dimensions of the client’s experience of his therapist with personality change. Genetic Psychol Monographs 76 (Monograph 43)
Bordin E (1975) The working alliance and bases for a general theory of psychotherapy. Paper given at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington DC
Crits-Christoph P, Cooper A, Luborsky L (1988) The accuracy of therapists’ interpretations and the outcome of dynamic psychotherapy. J Consult Clin Psychol 56: 490–495
Crowder JE (1972) Relationships between therapist and client interpersonal behaviors and psychotherapy outcome. J Counseling Psychol 19: 68 75
DeRubeis R, Feeley M (1990) Determinants of change in cognitive therapy for depression. Cogn Ther Res 14: 469–482
Feitel B (1968) Feeling understood as a function of a variety of therapist activity. Unpublished Ph D thesis. Teacher’s College, Columbia University
Foreman S, Marmar CR (1985) Therapist actions that address initially poor therapeutic alliances in psychotherapy. Am J Psychiatry 142: 922–926
Frank A, Gunderson J (in press) The role of the therapeutic alliance in the treatment of schizophrenia: Effects on course and outcome.
Freud S (1912/1958) The dynamics of the transference. In: Strachey J (ed and trans) The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, vol 12. Hogarth, London, pp 99–108
Gaston L, Marmar C, Ring J (1989) Engaging the difficult patient in Cognitive Therapy: Actions developing the therapeutic alliance. Paper given to the annual meeting of the Society for Psychotherapy Research. Toronto, Canada
Gaston L, Marmar CR, Thompson LW, Gallagher D (1988) Relation of patient pretreatment characteristics to the therapeutic alliance in diverse psychotherapies. J Consult Clin Psychol 56: 483–489
Gurman A (1977) The patient’s perception of the therapeutic relationship. In: Gurman A, Razin A (eds) Effective Psychotherapy — A Handbook of Research. Pergamon, Oxford, pp 503–543
Gurman A, Razin A (eds) (1977) Effective psychotherapy. Pergamon, Oxford
Hatcher R, Hansell J, Barends A, Leary K, Stuart J, White, K (1990) Comparison of psychotherapy alliance measures. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Psychotherapy Research. Wintergreen VA
Hartley D, Strupp H (1983) The therapeutic alliance: Its relationship to outcome in brief psychotherapy. In: Masling J (ed) Empirical studies of psychoanalytic theories, vol 1. Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ, pp 1–27
Horvath D, Greenberg L (1986) The development of the Working Alliance Inventory. In: Greenberg LS, Pinsof WM (eds) The psychotherapeutic process: A research handbook. Guilford, New York, pp 367–390
Luborsky L (1962) Clinicians’ judgments of mental health: A proposed scale. Arch Gen Psychiatry 7: 407–417
Luborsky L (1975) Clinicians’ judgments of mental health: Specimen case descriptions and forms for the Health-Sickness Rating Scale. Bull Menninger Clinic 35: 448–480
Luborsky L (1976) Helping alliances in psychotherapy: The groundwork for a study of their relationship to its outcome. In: Claghorn JL (ed) Successful psychotherapy. Brunner & Mazel, New York, pp 92–116
Luborsky L (1990) Theory and technique in dynamic psychotherapy — Curative factors and training therapists to maximize them. Psychother Psychosom 53: 50–57
Luborsky L, Crits-Christoph P, Alexander L, Margolis M, Cohen M (1983) Two helping alliance methods for predicting outcomes of psychotherapy: A counting signs versus a global rating method. J Nerv Ment Dis 171: 480–492
Luborsky L, Crits-Christoph P, Mintz J, Auerbach A (1988) Who will benefit from psychotherapy? Basic Books, New York
Luborsky L, Diguer L, Luborsky E, McLellan AT, Woody G, Alexander L (1993) Psychological health as a predictor of the outcomes in dynamic and other psychotherapies. J Consult Clin Psychol 61: 542–548
Luborsky L, McLellan AT, Woody GE, O’Brien CP, Auerbach A (1985) Therapist success and its determinants. Arch Gen Psychiatry 42: 602–611
MacKenzie R (1989) Comparing methods to assess patients for therapy. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychiatric Association, San Francisco
Marmar CR, Gaston L, Gallagher D, Thompson LW (1989) Alliance and outcome in late-life depression. J Ment Nerv Dis 171: 597–603
Marmar CR, Weiss DS, Gaston L (1989) Toward the validation of the California Therapeutic Alliance Rating System. Psychological Assessment. J Con Clin Psychol 1: 46–52
Marziali E (1984) Three viewpoints on the therapeutic alliance: Similarities, differences, and associations with psychotherapy outcome. J Nerv Ment Dis 172:417–423
Miller N, Luborsky L, Docherty J, Barber J (eds) (1993) Psychodynamic Treatment Research: A handbook for clinical practice. Basic Books, New York
Morgan R, Luborsky L, Crits-Christoph P, Curtis H, Solomon J (1982) Predicting the outcomes of psychotherapy by the Penn Helping Alliance method. Arch Gen Psychiat 39: 397–402
Orlinsky D, Geller J (1993) Patients’ representations of their therapists and therapy: A new focus of research. In: Miller N, Luborsky L, Barber J, Docherty J (eds) Psychodynamic treatment research — A handbook for clinical practice. Basic Books, New York
Parlof M (1961) Patient-therapist relationships and outcome of psychotherapy. J Consult Psychol 25: 29–38
Piper W, Azim HF, Joyce AS, McCallum M (1991) Quality of object relations vs. interpersonal functioning as predictors of therapeutic alliance and psychotherapy outcome. J Nervous Mental Disease 179: 432–438
Safran J, Crocker P, McMain S, Murray P (1990) The therapeutic alliance rupture as a therapy event for empirical investigation. Psychother 27: 154–165
Tichenor V, Hill CE (1989) Working alhance: A comparison of the validity and reliability of several measures. Manuscript submitted for publication
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1996 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Luborsky, L. (1996). Über das “Zusammenspiel”, das für eine therapeutische Allianz und ein gutes Therapieergebnis notwendig ist. In: Buchheim, P., Cierpka, M., Seifert, T. (eds) Spiel und Zusammenspiel in der Psychotherapie — Erinnern und Entwerfen im psychotherapeutischen Handeln — Operationalisierte Psychodynamische Diagnostik — Qualitätssicherung. Lindauer Texte. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-51501-9_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-51501-9_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-61021-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-51501-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive