Skip to main content

Scintigraphy-ventilation/perfusion scanning and imaging of the embolus

  • Chapter
Acute Pulmonary Embolism
  • 115 Accesses

Summary

Purpose: This is a review of data on ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) imaging obtained in the collaborative study, Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PIOPED). Special emphasis is given to data obtained subsequent to the main PIOPED publication. New criteria for the interpretation of V/Q scans are based on data obtained by retrospective evaluation of the data from PIOPED.

Background: PIOPED was a prospective randomized double blind investigation of the validity of V/Q scans, based on an angiographic diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) in 251 patients and an angiographic exclusion of PE in 480 patients and based on follow-up of patients with normal V/Q scans who did not undergo angiography.

Results:The original PIOPED criteria for interpretation of V/Q scans are reviewed. The positive predictive value of V/Q scans based on these criteria is shown. Clinical assessment in combination with objective readings of V/Q scans is evaluated. The positive predictive value of V/Q scans is assessed according to the complexity of associated disease. The validity of the perfusion scan alone is evaluated. Revised criteria for the interpretation of V/Q scans are described. Criteria for a very low probability interpretation are proposed. The importance of small perfusion defects is described. The diagnostic value of matched ventilation, perfusion and chest radiographic abnormalities is described. The concept of segmental equivalent perfusion defects is assessed. The concept of a mismatched vascular defect, whether moderate or large size, is described. An interpretation of V/Q scans based on the presence of a mismatched perfusion defect in patients stratified according to prior cardiopulmonary disease is described.

Conclusion: Retrospective analysis of the data from PIOPED has permitted an extensive assessment of the diagnostic validity of V/Q scans since the original PIOPED publication. New criteria for interpretation of V/Q scans have been proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Biello DR, Mattar AG, McKnight RC, Siegel BA (1979) Ventilation/perfusion studies in suspected pulmonary embolism. Amer J Radiol 133:1033–1037

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. A Collaborative Study by the PIOPED Investigators (1990) Value of the ventilation/perfusion scan in acute PE: Results of the Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PIOPED). J Am Med Assoc 263:2753–2759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Freitas JE, Sarosi MG, Nagle CC, Yeomans ME, Freitas AE, Juni JE (1995) Modified PIOPED criteria used in clinical practice. J Nucl Med 36:1573–1578

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gottschalk A, Stein PD, Henry JW, Relyea B (1996) Matched ventilation/perfusion defects and chest radiographic abnormalities: Re-evaluation of the triple matched defect in the assessment of acute pulmonary embolism. J Nucl Med 37:1636–1638

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gottschalk A, Sostman HD, Coleman RE, Juni JE, Thrall J, McKusick KA, Froelich JW, Alavi A (1993) Ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy in the PIOPED study. Part II. Evaluation of the scintigraphic criteria and interpretations. J Nucl Med 34:1119–1126

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hull RD, Raskob GE, Coates G, Panju A (1990) Clinical validity of a normal perfusion lung scan in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Chest 97:23–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hull RD, Raskob GE (1991) Low-probability lung scan findings: A need for change. Ann Internal Med 114:142–143

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kipper MS, Moser KM, Kortman KE, Ashburn WL (1982) Longterm follow-up of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism and a normal lung scan. Chest 82:411–415

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lesser BA, Leeper KV, Stein PD, Saltzman HA, Chen J, Thompson BT, Hales CA, Popovich J Jr, Greenspan RH, Weg JG (1992) The diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chest 102:17–22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Morrell NW, Nijran KS, Jones BE, Biggs T, Seed WA (1993) The underestimation of segmental defect size in radionuclide lung scanning. J Nucl Med 34:370–374

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Neumann RD, Sostman HD, Gottschalk A (1980) Current status of ventilation-perfusion imaging. Semin Nucl Med 10:198–217

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. PISA-PED Investigators. (1995) Invasive and noninvasive diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Chest 107:33S–38S

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Stein PD (1982) Low-dose heparin for prevention of pulmonary embolism and significance of normal lung scan. ACCP Bulletin 21:12–14

    Google Scholar 

  14. Stein PD, Alavi A, Gottschalk A, Hales CA, Saltzman HA, Vreim CE, Weg JG (1991) Usefulness of non-invasive diagnostic tools for diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism in patients with a normal chest radiograph. Am J Cardiol 67:1117–1120

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Stein PD, Coleman RE, Gottschalk A, Saltzman HA, Terrin ML, Weg JG (1991) Diagnostic utility of ventilation/perfusion lung scans in acute pulmonary embolism is not diminished by pre-existing cardiac or pulmonary disease. Chest 100:604–606

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Stein PD, Gottschalk A (1994) Critical review of ventilation/perfusion lung scans in acute pulmonary embolism. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 37:13–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Stein PD, Gottschalk A, Henry JW, Shivkumar K (1993) Stratification of patients according to prior cardiopulmonary disease and probability assessment based upon the number of mismatched segmental equivalent perfusion defects: Approaches to strengthen the diagnostic value of ventilation/perfusion lung scans in acute pulmonary embolism. Chest 104:1461–1467

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Stein PD, Henry JW, Gottschalk A (1993) Mismatched vascular defects: An easy alternative to mismatched segmental equivalent defects for the interpretation of ventilation/perfusion lung scans in pulmonary embolism. Chest 104:1468–1472

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Stein PD, Henry JW, Gottschalk A (1993) The addition of clinical assessment to stratification according to prior cardiopulmonary disease further optimizes the interpretation of ventilation/perfusion lung scans in pulmonary embolism. Chest 104:1472–1476

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Stein PD, Henry JW, Gottschalk A (1996) Small segmental perfusion defects in suspected pulmonary embolism. J Nucl Med 37:1313–1316

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Stein PD, Hull RD, Saltzman HA, Pineo G (1993) Strategy for diagnosis of patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism. Chest 103:1553–1559

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Stein PD, Hull RD, Pineo G (1995) Strategy that includes serial and noninvasive leg tests for diagnosis of thromboembolic disease in patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism: Estimated percentage of patients, based on data from PIOPED, in whom a noninvasive diagnosis or exclusion of thromboembolic disease might be safely made. Arch Intern Med 155:2101–2104

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Stein PD, Relyea B, Gottschalk A (1996) Evaluation of the positive predictive value of specific criteria used for the assessment of low probability ventilation/perfusion lung scans. J Nucl Med 37:577–581

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Stein PD, Terrin ML, Gottschalk A, Alavi A, Henry JW (1992) Value of ventilation/perfusion scans compared to perfusion scans alone in acute pulmonary embolism. Am J Cardiol 69:1239–1241

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. van Beek EJR, Kuyer PMM, Schenk BE, Brandjes DPM, tenCate JW, Buller HR (1995) A normal perfusion lung scan in patients with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism. Chest 108:170–173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Worsley DF, Kim CK, Alavi A, Palevsky HI (1993) Detailed analysis of patients with matched ventilation/perfusion defects and chest radiographic opacities. J Nucl Med 34:1851–1853

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Dr. Dietrich Steinkopff Verlag GmbH & Co. KG, Darmstadt

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stein, P.D. (2000). Scintigraphy-ventilation/perfusion scanning and imaging of the embolus. In: Geibel, A., Just, H., Kasper, W., Konstantinides, S. (eds) Acute Pulmonary Embolism. Steinkopff. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-51190-5_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-51190-5_8

  • Publisher Name: Steinkopff

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-51192-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-51190-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics