Skip to main content

Can oil shocks explain asymmetries in the US Business Cycle?

  • Chapter
Advances in Markov-Switching Models

Part of the book series: Studies in Empirical Economics ((STUDEMP))

Abstract

We consider whether oil prices can account for business cycle asymmetries. We test for asymmetries based on the Markov switching autoregressive model popularized by Hamilton (1989), using the tests devised by Clements and Krolzig (2000). We find evidence against the conventional wisdom that recessions are more violent than expansions: while some part of the downturn in economic activity that characterises recessionary periods can be attributed to dramatic changes in the price of oil, post-War US economic growth is characterized by the steepness of expansions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson HM, Vahid F (2001) Predicting the probability of a recession with nonlinear auto-regressive leading indicator models. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 5. Forthcoming

    Google Scholar 

  • Boldin MD (1996) A check on the robustness of Hamilton’s Markov switching model approach to the economic analysis of the Business Cycle. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics 1:35–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns AF, Mitchell WC (1946) Measuring business cycles. New York: NBER

    Google Scholar 

  • Canova F (1998) Detrending and business cycle facts. Journal of Monetary Economics 41:475–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clements MP, Krolzig H-M (1998) A comparison of the forecast performance of Markov-switching and threshold autoregressive models of US GNP. Econometrics Journal l:C47–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements MP, Krolzig H-M (2000) Business cycle asymmetries: Characterisation and testing based on Markov-switching autoregressions. mimeo, Department of Economics, University of Warwick

    Google Scholar 

  • Diebold FX, Rudebusch GD (1996) Measuring business cycles: A modern perspective. The Review of Economics and Statistics 78:67–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diebold FX, Rudebusch GD, Sichel DE (1993) Further evidence on business cycle duration dependence. In Stock J, Watson M (eds) Business Cycles, Indicators, and Forecasting, pp. 255–280: Chicago: University of Chicago Press and NBER

    Google Scholar 

  • Doornik JA (1999) Object-oriented matrix programming using Ox. London: Timberlake Consultants Press. 3rd edition

    Google Scholar 

  • Filardo AJ (1994) Business-cycle phases and their transitional dynamics. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 12:299–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Filardo AJ, Gordon SF (1998) Business cycle durations. Journal of Econometrics 85:99–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman M (1969) The optimum quantity of money and other essays. Chicago: Aldine

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman M (1993) The ‘plucking model’ of business fluctuations revisited. Economic Inquiry 31:171–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton JD (1983) Oil and the macroeconomy since World War II. Journal of Political Economy 91:228–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton JD (1989) A new approach to the economic analysis of nonstationary time series and the business cycle. Econometrica 57:357–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton JD (1996) This is what happened to the oil price-macroeconomy relationship. Journal of Monetary Economics 38:215–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton JD (2000) What is an oil shock? mimeo, Department of Economics, UCSD, La Jolla, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton JD, Lin G (1996) Stock market volatility and the business cycle. Journal of Applied Econometrics 11:573–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton JD (1990) Analysis of time series subject to changes in regime. Journal of Econometrics 45:39–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen BE (1992) The likelihood ratio test under nonstandard conditions: testing the Markov switching model of GNP. Journal of Applied Econometrics 7.S61–S82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen BE (1996) Erratum: The likelihood ratio test under nonstandard conditions: testing the Markov switching model of GNP. Journal of Applied Econometrics 11:195–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendry DF, Krolzig H-M (2001) Automatic econometric model selection with PcGets. London: Timberlake Consultants Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess GD, Iwata S (1995) Measuring business cycle features: University of Kansas, Research Papers in Theoretical and Applied Economics No. 1995–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooker MA (1996) Whatever happened to the oil price-macroeconomy relationship?. Journal of Monetary Economics 38:195–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansen S (1995) Likelihood-based inference in cointegrated vector autoregressive models. Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Krolzig H-M (1996) Statistical analysis of cointegrated VAR processes with Markovian regime shifts. SFB 373 Discussion Paper 25/1996, Humboldt Universität, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Krolzig H-M (1997) Markov switching vector autoregressions: Modelling, statistical inference and application to business cycle analysis: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, 454. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Krolzig H-M (1998) Econometric modelling of Markov-switching vector autoregressions using MS VAR for Ox. Discussion paper, Institute of Economics and Statistics, University of Oxford: http://www.econ.ox.ac.uk/research/hendry/krolzig

    Google Scholar 

  • Krolzig H-M (2001) Business cycle measurement in the presence of structural change: International evidence. International Journal of Forecasting 17:349–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krolzig H-M, Hendry DF (2001) Computer automation of general-to-specific model selection procedures. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 25:831–866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krolzig H-M, Sensier M (2000) A disaggregated Markov-switching model of the business cycle in UK manufacturing. Manchester School 68(3):442–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krolzig H-M, Toro J (1998) A new approach to the analysis of shocks and the cycle in a model of output and employment. Working paper eco 99/30, EUI, Florence

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee K, Ni S, Ratti A (1995) Oil shocks and the macroeconomy: The role of price variability. Energy Journal 16:39–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Luukkonen R, Saikkonen P, Teräsvirta T (1988) Testing linearity against smooth transition autoregressive models. Biometrika 75:491–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luukkonen R, Teräsvirta T (1991) Testing linearity of economic time series against cyclical asymmetry. Annales d’économie et de statistique 20/21:125–142

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnell MM, Perez-Quiros GP (2000) Output fluctuations in the United States: What has changed since the early 1980s?. American Economic Review 90:1464–1476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McQueen G, Thorley S (1993) Asymmetric business cycle turning points. Journal of Monetary Economics 31:341–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell WC (1927) Business cycles: The problem and its setting. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research

    Google Scholar 

  • Mork KA (1989) Oil and the macroeconomy when prices go up and down: An extension of Hamilton’s results. Journal of Political Economy 97:740–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newey WK, West KD (1987) A simple positive semi-definite heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation-consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica 55:703–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravn MO, Sola M (1995) Stylized facts and regime changes: Are prices procyclical?. Journal of Monetary Economics 36:497–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raymond JE, Rich RW (1997) Oil and the macroeconomy: A Markov state-switching approach. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 29:193–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sichel DE (1993) Business cycle asymmetry. Economic Inquiry 31:224–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sichel DE (1994) Inventories and the three phases of the business cycle. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 12:269–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Teräsvirta T, Anderson HM (1992) Characterizing nonlinearities in business cycles using smooth transition autoregressive models. Journal of Applied Econometrics 7:119–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tong H (1995) Non-linear time series. A dynamical system approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press. First published 1990

    Google Scholar 

  • Tong H, Lim KS (1980) Threshold autoregression, limit cycles and cyclical data. Journal of The Royal Statistical Society B 42:245–292

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Clements, M.P., Krolzig, HM. (2002). Can oil shocks explain asymmetries in the US Business Cycle?. In: Hamilton, J.D., Raj, B. (eds) Advances in Markov-Switching Models. Studies in Empirical Economics. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-51182-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-51182-0_3

  • Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-51184-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-51182-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics