Abstract
Many researchers use GARCH models to generate volatility forecasts. Using data on three major U.S. dollar exchange rates we show that such forecasts are too high in volatile periods. We argue that this is due to the high persistence of shocks in GARCH forecasts. To obtain more flexibility regarding volatility persistence, this paper generalizes the GARCH model by distinguishing two regimes with different volatility levels; GARCH effects are allowed within each regime. The resulting Markov regime-switching GARCH model improves on existing variants, for instance by making multi-period-ahead volatility forecasting a convenient recursive procedure. The empirical analysis demonstrates that the model resolves the problem with the high single-regime GARCH forecasts and that it yields significantly better out-of-sample volatility forecasts.
I thank Harry Huizinga, Frank de Jong, Michael McAleer, Bertrand Melenberg, Theo Nijman, Arthur van Soest, Kenneth West, the editors of this issue, James Hamilton and Baldev Raj, and two referees for very useful and constructive comments.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Andersen TG, Bollerslev T (1998) Answering the skeptics: Yes, standard volatility models do provide accurate forecasts. International Economic Review 39:885–905
Ang A, Bekaert G (1998) Regime switches in interest rates. NBER Working Paper No. 6508
Bollerslev T (1986) Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics 31:307–327
Bollerslev T, Chou RY, Kroner KF (1992) ARCH modeling in finance. Journal of Econometrics 52:5–59
Cai J (1994) A Markov model of unconditional variance in ARCH. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 12:309–316
Chaudhuri K, Klaassen F (2000) Have east Asian stock markets calmed down? Evidence from a regime switching model. Mimeo University of Amsterdam
Dewachter H (1997) Sign predictions of exchange rate changes: Charts as proxies for Bayesian inferences. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 133:39–55
Engle RF (1982) Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity with estimates of the variance of U.K. inflation. Econometrica 50:987–1008
Engle RF, Bollerslev T (1986) Modeling the persistence of conditional variances. Econometric Reviews 5:1–50
Fong WM (1998) The dynamics of DM/£ exchange rate volatility: A SWARCH analysis. International Journal of Finance and Economics 3:59–71
Gray SF (1996a) Modeling the conditional distribution of interest rates as a regime-switching process. Journal of Financial Economics 42:27–62
Gray SF (1996b) An analysis of conditional regime-switching models. Working paper Fuqua School of Business Duke University
Hamilton JD (1989) A new approach to the economic analysis of nonstationary time series and the business cycle. Econometrica 57:357–384
Hamilton JD, Susmel R (1994) Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity and changes in regime. Journal of Econometrics 64:307–333
Hansen BE (1992) The likelihood ratio test under nonstandard conditions: Testing the Markov switching model of GNP. Journal of Applied Econometrics 7:S61–S82
Kaufmann S, Scheicher M (1996) Markov-regime switching in economic variables: Part I. modelling, estimating and testing. — part II. a selective survey. Institute for Advanced Studies University of Vienna Economics Series No. 38
Klaassen FJGM (1999) Long swings in exchange rates: Are they really in the data?. Center for Economic Research Tilburg University Discussion Paper No. 9908
Lamoureux CG, Lastrapes WD (1990) Persistence in variance, structural change, and the GARCH model. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 8:225–234
MacDonald R, Taylor MP (1992) Exchange rate economics: A survey. IMF Staff Papers 39:1–57
Meese RA, Rogoff K (1983) Empirical exchange rate models of the seventies: Do they fit out of sample?. Journal of International Economics 14:3–24
Merton RC (1980) On estimating the expected return on the market: An exploratory investigation. Journal of Financial Economics 8:323–361
Newey WK, West KD (1987) A simple, positive semi-definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica 55:703–708
Newey WK, West KD (1994) Automatic lag selection in covariance matrix estimation. Review of Economic Studies 61:631–653
Pagan AR, Schwert GW (1990) Alternative models for conditional stock volatility. Journal of Econometrics 45:267–290
Perron P (1989) The great crash, the oil price shock, and the unit root hypothesis. Econometrica 57:1361–1401
Scheicher M (1999) Nonlinear dynamics: Evidence for a small stock exchange. Empirical Economics 24:45–59
Schwert GW (1989) Why does stock market volatility change over time?. Journal of Finance 44:1115–1153
Timmermann A (2000) Moments of Markov switching models. Journal of Econometrics 96:75–111
West KD (1996) Asymptotic inference about predictive ability. Econometrica 64:1067–1084
West KD, Cho D (1995) The predictive ability of several models of exchange rate volatility. Journal of Econometrics 69:367–391
West KD, McCracken MW (1998) Regression-based tests of predictive ability. International Economic Review 39:817–840
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Klaassen, F. (2002). Improving GARCH volatility forecasts with regime-switching GARCH. In: Hamilton, J.D., Raj, B. (eds) Advances in Markov-Switching Models. Studies in Empirical Economics. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-51182-0_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-51182-0_10
Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-51184-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-51182-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive