Skip to main content

Conceptual Clustering in Structured Domains: A Theory Guided Approach

  • Conference paper
New Approaches in Classification and Data Analysis

Abstract

In the paper, ULS, a conjunctive clustering system working on structured descriptions, is described. It uses background knowledge defined as a theory about the classification goals. It involves learning category structure from previous information concerning the features and the domain in order to simplify, at least from a computational point of view, the clustering process. ULS explicitly couples clustering and characterization: the task of clustering is performed adopting a similarity based approach while characterization aims at intensionally defining concepts. The background knowledge is adopted in clustering, in order to partition the initial space by the definition of class prototypes, and in characterization, in order to define some heuristics useful to guide the search process in concept generalization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • BRITO, P., DIDAY, E. (1990): Piramidal representation of symbolic objects. In: M. Schader, W. Gaul (eds.): Knowledge, Data and Computer Assisted Decisions Springer Verlag, 3–16.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • DIDAY, E., SIMON, J.C. (1976): Clustering Analysis. In: K.S. Fu (ed.) Digital Pattern Recognition Springer Verlag, 47–94.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ESPOSITO, F. (1990): Automatic Acquisition of Production Rules by Empirical Supervised Learning Methods. In: M. Schader, W. Gaul (eds.): Knowledge, Data and Computer Assisted Decisions Springer Verlag, 35–48.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ESPOSITO, F., MALERBA, D., SEMERARO, G. (1991a): Classification of Incomplete Structural Descriptions using a Probabilistic Distance Measure. In: E. Diday and Y. Lechevallier (eds.): Symbolic-Numeric Data Analysis and Learning Nova Science Pub., New York, 469–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • ESPOSITO, F., MALERBA, D., SEMERARO, G. (1991b): Flexible Matching for noisy structural descriptions. In Proc. of 12th Int. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence. Sidney, Australia, Morgan Kaufmann, 658–664.

    Google Scholar 

  • ESPOSITO, F., MALERBA, D., SEMERARO, G. (1992): Classification in noisy environments using a Distance Measure between structural symbolic descriptions. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol.14, No.3, 390–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FISHER, D.H., (1987): Knowledge acquisition via incremental conceptual clustering. Machine Learning, 2, 139–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • FISHER, D.H., PAZZANI, M. (1991): Theory Guided Concept Formation. In: D.H. Fisher, M. Pazzani and P. Langley (eds.): Concept Formation: knowledge and experience in unsupervised learning Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • HANSON, S.J. (1990): Conceptual Clustering and categorization. In: Y. Kodratoff and R. Michalski (eds.): Machine Learning: an Artificial Intelligence Approach, Vol. III. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 235–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • LARSON, J. (1977): Inductive Inference in the Variable Valued Predicate Logic System VL21. Ph.D. Thesis: Dept. of Computer Science, Urbana, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • MICHALSKI, R., DIDAY, E., STEPP, R.(1982): A recent advance in Data Analysis: clustering objects into classes characterized by conjunctive concepts. In: L. Kanal and A. Rosenfeld (eds.): Progress in Pattern Recognition, Vol. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • MICHALSKI, R.S. (1983): A theory and methodology of inductive learning. In: R.S. Michalski, J.G. Carbonell and T. Mitchell (eds.): Machine Learning, an Artificial Intelligence Approach Tioga, Palo Alto, CA, 83–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • MICHALSKI, R., STEPP, R. (1983): Learning from observation: conceptual clustering. In: R. Michalski, J.C. Carbonell, T. Mitchell eds.: Machine Learning: An Artificial Intelligence Approach Tioga, Palo Alto, CA, 331–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • STEPP, R., MICHALSKI, R., (1986): Conceptual Clustering of structured objects: a goal-oriented approach. Artificial Intelligence 28, 43–69, Elsevier Science Pub, North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Esposito, F. (1994). Conceptual Clustering in Structured Domains: A Theory Guided Approach. In: Diday, E., Lechevallier, Y., Schader, M., Bertrand, P., Burtschy, B. (eds) New Approaches in Classification and Data Analysis. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-51175-2_45

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-51175-2_45

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-58425-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-51175-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics