Summary
Within a new paradigm of categorization which is currently being developed in cognitive research, one of the main phenomena which has to be taken into account, is typicality (representativeness, family resemblance…). The gradedness that it introduces into categorical structures entails reconsideration of the relationship between extension and intension within categorical structures as well as between them. This involves both technical aspects and theoretical considerations relating to the meaningfulness of mathematical models to explain cognitive structures. Our contribution bears on the use and the evaluation of different data analysis methods to get at the featural structure of non verbal concepts from their graded extensional representation. The case which is used is that of mental categories of roads and landscapes in order to illustrate the main concepts that mathematical models of cognitive structures must (and can) explain on formal, theoretical and practical levels.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
ARABIE, P. & HUBERT, L.J. (1992): Combinatorial data analysis, Annual review of psychology, 1943: 169–203.
ARABIE, P., HUBERT, L.J. & DE SOETE, G. (Eds.) (1993): Clustering and classification, Teaneck, N.J. World scientific.
BARTHELEMY, J.P., GUENOCHE, A. (1988): Les arbres et les représentations des proximités. Paris: Masson (english translation to appear by Wiley).
BEN SIMON-DARCEL, N. (1993): ObAdE des objets pour la modélisation cognitive, These de 1’Université de Paris XI.- Villetaneuse.
DESPRES, S. (1993): Quel formalisme pour quelle typicalité? Actes des “Journées de Brest”, Atelier “Catégorisation” du GDR “Sciences cognitives de Paris”, sous presse.
DIDAY, E. (1991): Des objets de Panalyse des données á ceux de Panalyse des connaissances, in E. Diday & Y. Kodratoff (Eds.) Induction symbolique et numérique à partir de données, Cepadues -Editions.
DIDAY, E. (1992): From data to knowledge: probabilistic objects for a symbolic data analysis, in Y. Dodge & J. Whittaker (Eds.) Computational Statistics, Vol.1, Physica Verlag.
DUBOIS, BARTHELEMY, TENIN (submitted): Tree representation of similarity and categorization of situations from photographs and drawings.
DUBOIS, D.(1991): Categorisation et cognition: 10 ans après une évaluation des concepts de Rosch, In D. Dubois (ed), Sémantique et Cognition, Paris: Ed. du CNRS.
DUBOIS, D. (1993): Prototypes and lexical organization as heterogeneous and dynamic systems, Actes du congrés de systémique, Prague, Oct 1993.
DUBOIS, D., FLEURY, D., MAZET, C. (1993): Representations catégorielles: perception et/ou action? Contribution à partir d’une analyse des situations routières, in: Weil-Fassina et al. (Eds.) Représentations pour Faction, Toulouse, Octares.
FLEURY, D. (1992): Catégorisation de scènes: de l’analyse des accidents aux representations typiques, Intellectica, 15.
FLEURY, D., DUBOIS, D., FLINE, C., PEYTAVIN, J.F. (1991): Categorisation mentale et sécurité des réseaux, Rapport INRETS n° 146.
GASCUEL, O. (1991): Quelques aspects numeriques de Panalyse symbolique des données: illustration sur une application, in E. Diday & Y. Kodratoif (Eds.) Induction symbolique et numérique a partir de données, Cepadues -Editions.
GETTLER-SUMMA, M. (1992): Interpretations symboliques en analyse des correspondances multiples, Journées “symbolique-numérique” pour Vapprentissage de connaissances à partir de données. E. Diday & T. Kodratoff (Eds.) Lise-Cremade.
GUENOCHE, A & MONJARDET, B. (1987): Méthodes ordinales et combinatoires en analyses de données. Mathématique, informatique et sciences humaines, 100, 5–47.
HAMPTON, J. (1993): Prototype models of concept representation, in I.V. Mechelen et Coll. (Eds.) Categories and concepts. Theoretical views and inductive data analysis, London: Academic Press.
HAMPTON, J. and DUBOIS, D. (1993): Psychological models of concepts. In I.V. Mechelen et Coll. (Eds.) Categories and concepts. Theoretical views and inductive data analysis, London: Academic Press.
KANT E. (1775): De la diversité des races en général. Trad. Frangaise in La Philosophie de l’histoire, Aubier 1947.
MEDIN, D.L. (1989): “Concepts and conceptual structure”. American Psychologist, 44: 1469–81.
MICHALSKI, R. & DIDAY, E. (1981): A recent advance in data analysis: clustering objects into classes characterized by conjunctive concepts, in L.N. Kanal & A. Rosenfeld (Eds.) Progress in pattern recognition. North Holland.
MURTAGH, F. (1993): Neural networks for clustering, in P. Arabie, L.J. Hubert & G. De Soete, G. De Soete (Eds.) Clustering and classification, Teaneck, N.J. World scientific.
ROSCH (1973): Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, Vol 4, 3, 328–350.
ROSCH, E. (1978) a: Human categorization, in Warren, Advances in Cross-cultural psychology, Academic Press.
ROSCH, E. (1978) b: Principles of categorization, in E. Rosch & B. Lloyd (Eds.) Cognition and categorization, Hillsdale, L.Erlaum.
SOKAL, R.R. & SNEATH, P.H. (1963): Principles of numerical taxonomy, San Francisco, Freeman.
SUTCLIFFE, J.P. (1993): Concept, class, and category in the tradition of Aristotle, in Van Mechelen, et al. (Eds.) (1993) Categories and concepts. Theoretical views and inductive data analysis, London: Academic Press.
VAN MECHELEN, I., HAMPTON, J., MICHALSKI, R., and THEUNS, P. (Eds.) (1993): Categories and concepts. Theoretical views and inductive data analysis, London: Academic Press.
WILLE, R. (1982): Restructuring lattice theory: an approach based on hierarchies of concepts, in I. Rival (Ed.) Symposium on ordered sets. Dordrecht-Boston, Riedel. pp.445–70.
XU, Z. (1989): Catégorisation de l’frastructure par l’usager en fonction des approches de l’analyse des données, INRIA Rocquencourt et Université de Paris IX-Dauphine.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1994 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Dubois, D., Fleury, D. (1994). From classifications to cognitive categorization: the example of the road lexicon. In: Diday, E., Lechevallier, Y., Schader, M., Bertrand, P., Burtschy, B. (eds) New Approaches in Classification and Data Analysis. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-51175-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-51175-2_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-58425-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-51175-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive