Skip to main content

How Can Decentralized Non-Cooperative Stabilization Policies Be Efficient? — A Differential Game Approach

  • Conference paper
Macroeconomic Policy Games

Part of the book series: Studies in Empirical Economics ((STUDEMP))

  • 40 Accesses

Abstract

It is well known that non-cooperative behaviour of different policy-makers, either central bank and government on a national level or governments of different countries on an international level, may result in severe overall losses and inefficiencies. On the other hand, policy coordination is difficult to achieve, given the mechanisms of negotiations between several policy-making institutions. A solution to this “trade-off” would be a mechanism inducing individual behaviour that ensures efficient (Pareto-optimal) outcomes equivalent to those achieved by cooperation, but without the need of explicit agreements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baar, T. and G.J. Olsder (1982): “Dynamic noncopperative game theory.” Academic Press, London et al.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D. and P. Michel (1988): “How should control theory be used to calculate a time-consistent government policy?” Review of Economic Studies, 55, pp.263–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dockner, E.J. and R. Neck (1988): “Time-consistency, subgame-perfectness, solution concepts and information patterns in dynamic models of stabilization policies.” Unpublished manuscript, Saskatoon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J.W. (1977): “Oligopoly and the theory of games.” North-Holland, Amsterdam et al.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haurie, A. and B. Tolwinski (1985): “Definition and properties of cooperative equilibria in a two-player game of infinite duration.” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 46, pp.525–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leitmann, G. (1974): “Cooperative and non-cooperative many players differential games.” Springer Verlag, Vienna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, P. and D. Currie (1985): “Optimal feedback rules in an open economy macromodel with rational expectations.” European Economic Review, 27, pp.141–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, P. and D. Currie (1987): “Does international macroeconomic policy coordination pay and is it sustainable? A two country analysis.” Oxford Economic Papers, 33, pp.38–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, M. and M. Salmon (1985): “Dynamic games and the time inconsistency of optimal policy in open economies.” Economic Journal, Supplement, 95, pp.124–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neck, R. and E.J. Dockner (1987): “Conflict and cooperation in a model of stabilization policies: A differential game approach.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 11, pp. 153–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neck, R. and E.J. Dockner (1988): “Commitment and coordination in a dynamic game model of international economic policy-making.” Unpublished manuscript, Vienna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neese, J.W. and R.S. Pindyck (1984): “Behavioural assumptions in decentralised stabilisation policies.” In: A. J. Hughes Hallett (ed.), Applied decision analysis and economic behaviour. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oudiz, G. and J. Sachs (1984): “Macroeconomic policy coordination among the industrial economies.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, (1), pp. 1–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oudiz, G. and J. Sachs (1985): “International policy coordination in dynamic macroeconomic models.” In: W. H. Buiter and R. C. Marston (eds.), International economic policy coordination. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinganum, J.F. and N.S. Stokey (1985): “Oligopoly extraction of a common property natural resource: The importance of the period of commitment in dynamic games.” International Economic Review, 26, pp.161–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, K. (1985): “Can international monetary policy cooperation be counterproductive?” Journal of International Economics, 18, pp.199–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selten, R. (1975): “Reexamination of the perfectness concept for equilibrium points in extensive games.” International Journal of Game Theory, 4, pp.25–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dockner, E.J., Neck, R. (1995). How Can Decentralized Non-Cooperative Stabilization Policies Be Efficient? — A Differential Game Approach. In: Riedl, A., Winckler, G., Wörgötter, A. (eds) Macroeconomic Policy Games. Studies in Empirical Economics. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-50307-8_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-50307-8_3

  • Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-50309-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-50307-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics