Skip to main content

Facilities Layout for Social Institutions

  • Conference paper
Operations Research Proceedings 2001

Part of the book series: Operations Research Proceedings 2001 ((ORP,volume 2001))

Abstract

Whenever a social institution plans new buildings or a modification of buildings (e.g. a hospital or a nursing home) the question arises how to arrange the rooms and functional units. One criterion is certainly the total walking distance of staff members, patients/clients and visitors.

Most of the existing approaches to the facilities layout problem either assume only one objective or they deal with several criteria but end up with only a single solution. Our approach focuses on determining Pareto-solutions which are presented to the decision makers. On that basis, it is possible to make a sound decision about the arrangement — by potentially incorporating those implicit criteria, which exist but have not been formulated before.

Furthermore, input data is most often assumed to be completely known which is in general not true. We show how uncertainty could be taken into account such that finally a robust solution is attained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, W. P. and Johnson, T. A. (1994) Improved Linear Programming-Based Lower Bounds for the Quadratic Assignment Problem. DIM ACS 19, 43–75

    Google Scholar 

  2. Adams, W. P. and Sherali, H. D. (1986) A tight Linearization and an Algorithm for Zero-One Quadratic Programming Problems. Management Science 32, 1274–1290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Burkard, R. E. and Çela, E. and Klinz, B. (1994) On the Biquadratic Assignment Problems. DIMACS 16, 117–146

    Google Scholar 

  4. Çela, E. (1998) The Quadratic Assignment Problem, Theory and Algorithms. Kluwer Academic Publishers

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Ehrgott, M., Harnacher, H. W, Klamroth, K., Nickel, S., and Schoebel, A. (1997) A note on the equivalence of balace points and Pareto solutions in multiple-objective programming. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 92(1), 209–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Frieze, A. M. and Yadegar, J. (1983) On the Quadratic Assignment Problem. Discrete Applied Mathematics 5, 98–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Glover, F. (1972) Improved linear representation of deserete mathematical programs. Management Science Report Series, University of Colorado

    Google Scholar 

  8. Harnacher, H. W. and Queyranne, M. (1985) K best Solutions to combinatorial optimization problems. Annals of Operations Research 6, 123–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kaufman, L. and Broeckx, F.(1978) An algorithm for the quadratic assignment problem using Benders’ decomposition. European Journal of Operational Research 2, 204–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Li, W.-J. and MacGregor Smith, J. (1994) Stochastic Quadratic Assignment Problems. DIMACS 16, 221–236

    Google Scholar 

  11. Padberg, M. W. and Rijal, M. P. (1996) Location, Scheduling, Design and Integer Programming. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hamacher, H.W., Nickel, S., Tenfelde-Podehl, D. (2002). Facilities Layout for Social Institutions. In: Chamoni, P., Leisten, R., Martin, A., Minnemann, J., Stadtler, H. (eds) Operations Research Proceedings 2001. Operations Research Proceedings 2001, vol 2001. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-50282-8_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-50282-8_29

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43344-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-50282-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics