Skip to main content

From Exogenous to Endogenous Local Development: The Cases of the Toulouse and Sophia Antipolis Technopoles

  • Conference paper
Book cover Complexity and Industrial Clusters

Part of the book series: Contributions to Economics ((CE))

Abstract

Regional clusters and local organisation of the industry have been proved to be basic elements of economic growth and innovation. The understanding of the processes underlying local development is thus pivotal. The paper attempts to contribute to this aim through the analysis of Toulouse, in the French southwest region Midi-Pyrénées, and Sophia Antipolis, in the southeast French Riviera. Both be considered as the outcomes of the French national system of innovation and the process of decentralisation initiated in the late sixties, and are today well known centres of high technology activity. But, as the numerous failed experiences of top-down reinforcement suggest, the factors the two areas have been endowed cannot explain as such the emergence and development of local innovative milieux. Considering clusters as evolving open complex systems, the paper analyses the reconfigurations of the clusters implied by changes in internal and external conditions that have led to endogenous innovative processes characteristic of technopoles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allinne, J. P. (1996), “Les technopoles sont-elles centenaires? Systèmes innovateurs et création d’entreprises en France”, Revue d’Economie Régionale et Urbaine, 5, pp. 1870–1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, E. S. and Teubal, M. (1999), High Tech Cluster Creation and Cluster Reconfiguration — A System Policy Perspective, Mimeo, DRUID, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, W. B. (1989), “Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns and Look-in by Historical Events”, The Economic Journal, Vol. 99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bécattini, G. (1990), “The Marshallian Industrial District as a Socio-economic Notion”, in: Industrial districts and inter-firm cooperation in Italy, Pyke, F. and al. (eds), Geneve, International Institute for Labour Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brusco, S. (1982), “The Emilian Model: Productive Decentralisation and Social Integration”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 6, pp. 167–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camagni, R. (1991), Local “Milieu”, Uncertainty and Innovation Networks : Towards a New Dynamic Theory of Economic Space, in: Innovation networks: spatial perspective, Camagni, R. (ed.), London, Belhaven Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DRIRE — INSEE (2001), L’industrie en Midi-Pyrénées, Dossiers Etudes n°104.

    Google Scholar 

  • DRIRE (1998), Les industries de l’aéronautique et du spatial en Midi-Pyrénées.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupuy, C. and Gilly, J. P. (1999), Industrial Groups and Territories: the Case of Matra-Marconi-Space in Toulouse, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnsey, E. (1998), “The Genesis of the High Technology Milieu”, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, vol. 22 n° 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnsey, E. and Longhi, C. (1997), High Technology Locations and Economic Development, EUNIT (European Network on Industry, Innovation and Territory) International Conference on Industry, Innovation and Territory, Lisbon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnsey, E. and Longhi, C. (1999), “Auto-organisation et émergence des milieux innovateurs”, Revue d’Economie Régionale et Urbaine, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, R. (1996), “Industrial Districts and the Globalization of Innovation: Regions and Networks in the new economic space”, in: Wealth from Diversity, Vence-Deza, X. and Metcalfe, J. S., Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gormand, C. (1993), L’industrie aéronautique et spatiale, Paris, L’Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossetti, M. (1990), “Enseignement supérieur et technopole, l’exemple de l’informatique à Toulouse”, Revue Française de Sociologie, XXXI.3.

    Google Scholar 

  • INSEE (1998), 15 ans d’aéronautique et d’espace en Midi-Pyrénées, Toulouse.

    Google Scholar 

  • INSEE (2000a), “Aéronautique, espace et sous-traitance”, Repères, 100.

    Google Scholar 

  • INSEE (2000b), Tableaux économiques de Midi-Pyrénées, Toulouse.

    Google Scholar 

  • INSEE (2001), “Les NTIC en Midi-Pyrénées”, 6 Pages, 46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kechidi, M. (1996), “Coordination inter-entreprises et relations de sous-traitance: le cas d’Aérospatiale”, Revue d’Economic Régionale et Urbaine, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeble, D. et al. (1998), Collective Learning Processes and Inter-Firm Networking in Innovative High-Technology Regions, ESRC (Economic & Social Research Council) Centre for Business Research, Working Paper 86, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longhi, C. (1999), “Networks, Collective Learning and Technology Development in Innovative High Technology Regions: the Case of Sophia-Antipolis”, Regional Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longhi, C. and Quéré, M. (1993), “Innovative Networks and the Technopolis Phenomenon: the Case of Sophia-Antipolis”, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luger, M. I. (2001), Science and Technology Parks at the Millennium: Concept, History, and Metrics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, A. (1996), “Sticky Places in Slippery Spaces: A Typology of Industrial Districts”, Economic Geography.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, J. S. (2000), “Propspects and Challenge for Research on Innovation”, Coevolution of Systems of Innovation, Conference, Berlin, June 8th–9th.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, P. (1988), Airbus, l’ambition européenne. Logique d’Etat, logique de marché, Paris, L’Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1990), The Competitive Advantage of Nations, New York, Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian, A. (1994), Regional Advantage, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storper, M. (1993), “Regional “Worlds” of Production: Learning and Innovation in the Technology Districts of France, Italy and the USA”, Regional Studies, vol. 27.5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talbot, D. (2000), Institutional Dynamics and Localized Inter-Firms Relations. The Case of Aerospatiale and its Subcontractors in Toulouse, European Urban and Regional Studies, 7(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Veltz, P. (1993), D’une géographie des coûts à une géographie de l’organisation. Quelques thèses sur l’évolution des rapports entreprises/territoires, Revue Economique, n°4.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Physica-Verlag Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Longhi, C. (2002). From Exogenous to Endogenous Local Development: The Cases of the Toulouse and Sophia Antipolis Technopoles. In: Curzio, A.Q., Fortis, M. (eds) Complexity and Industrial Clusters. Contributions to Economics. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-50007-7_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-50007-7_11

  • Publisher Name: Physica-Verlag HD

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-1471-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-50007-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics