Skip to main content

Changes in the Rate and Types of Poverty: The Czech and Slovak Republics 1990–1993

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Contributions to Economics ((CE))

Abstract

The beginning of the economic transition in all post-communist countries has caused a number of social problems. First, price liberalization has led to a general decrease in the purchasing power of incomes and thus has made an increasing part of the population vulnerable to poverty. Second, the reduced state monopoly and the start of privatization of big enterprises has resulted in unemployment, which was mostly unknown until this time. In addition to the “old poverty”, which especially endangered single headed or large families and the oldest pensioners, there is an emerging “new poverty” which stems from unemployment or the low adaptability of some households to the new conditions. Economically unstable households are those that are the least able to take advantage of the new possibilities and to mobilize alternative economic sources (e.g., transferring to the expansive segments of the labor market, utilizing secondary incomes, making use of old or newly acquired real estate, etc.).

This research was supported by the ACE Grant No. ERB4012PL9 10135 “Poverty, Welfare Policy and Work Incentives in the Czech and Slovak Republics” of the European Community and Grant No. 828106 “Labor Market, Income Distribution and Social Policy during the Period of Transformation” of the Grant Agency of the Academy of Sciences, Czech Republic. Thanks are due to Stein Ringen, Oxford University, Vanessa Fry, University of Essex and especially to Thesia I. Garner, U.S. Department of Labor for valuable comments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Atkinson, A.B. 1989. Poverty and Social Security. Hemel Hempstead, Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A.B. 1990. “Comparing poverty rates internationally: Lessons from recent studies in OECD countries”. Discussion Papers of STICERD, London School of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleeck, H., K. Van den Bosch. 1992. “Poverty and adequacy of social security in Europe: A comparative analysis”. Journal of European Social Policy, 2 (2) pp. 107–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat. 1990. Rapid reports. Population and social conditions No. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goedhart, Th., V. Halberstadt, A. Kapteyn and B.M.S. Van Praag. 1977. “The Poverty Line: Concept and Measurement”. The Journal of Human Resources, vol. 12 (4), pp. 503–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Higgins, M., Jenkins, S. 1990. Poverty in the EC: Estimates for 1975, 1980 and 1985. In R. Teekens and B. Van Praag (eds.) Analyzing Poverty in the European Community. Eurostat, Luxembourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapteyn, A., S. Van de Geer, H. Van der Stadt. 1985. The impact of changes in income and family composition on subjective measures of well-being. In: M. David, T. Smeeding (eds.) Horizontal Equity and the Distribution of Tax Burden. Chicago, NBER and Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Main economic and social indicators of the Czech Republic. 1993. Research Institute of Labor and Social Affaires, Prague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milanovic, B. 1990. Poverty in Poland, Hungary and Yugoslavia in the Years of Crisis. Working Papers. World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainwater, L. 1974. What Money Buys. Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainwater, L. 1990. “Poverty and equivalence as social constructions.” Prepared for Seminar on Families and Levels of Living: Observations and Analysis. Barcelona. 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, P. 1970. The Concept of Poverty. Heinemann, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Praag, B.M.S., R.J. Flik. 1990. Subjective poverty. Rotterdam, Foundation for Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Praag, B.M.S., R.J. Flik. 1991. “Poverty lines and equivalence scales. A theoretical and empirical evaluation.” Paper for the conference Poverty Measurement for the Economies in Transition in Eastern European Countries. Warsaw, October 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veçerník, J. 1991a. The system of distribution in socialist Czechoslovakia: empirical data and hypotheses of explanation (in Czech). Sociologicky çasopis, 27(1), pp. 39–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veçerník, J. 1991b. Earnings distribution in Czechoslovakia: Intertemporal change and international comparison. European Sociological Review, 7 (3), pp 237–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veçerník J. 1991c. Income distribution in Czechoslovakia. Bulletin BIRG (Basic Income Research Group), (13), pp. 14–18.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Veçerník, J. (1997). Changes in the Rate and Types of Poverty: The Czech and Slovak Republics 1990–1993. In: Ott, N., Wagner, G.G. (eds) Income Inequality and Poverty in Eastern and Western Europe. Contributions to Economics. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-50003-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-50003-9_8

  • Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-0974-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-50003-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics