Skip to main content

Operations Research and Project Management Past, Present and Future

  • Chapter
Dimensions of Project Management

Abstract

In project management the large number of publications about operation research topics contrast to the small number of real applications. The author analyzes the reasons of the poor acceptance and the implementation gap and makes some suggestions to bridge this gap. A closer cooperation between software developers, operations research experts and users and new methodical approaches are demanded.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. A comprehensive bibliography can be found, e.g. in the following work: Slowinski, R.; Weglarz, R. (Eds.) Advances in Project Scheduling. Studies in Production and Engineering Economics 9, Amsterdam 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Particularly refer to Booker, J.M.; Bryson, M.C Decision Analysis in Project Management: An Overview, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. EM-32, No. 1, February 1985, pp. 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Refer to Kaufmann, A Réseaux et Systèmes dans L’Incertain Structure. Utilisation pratique et efficace des concepts flous, in: Gutsch, R.; Reschke, H.; Schelle, H (Eds.): Proceedings of the 6th Internet Congress 1979, Vol. 5, Düsseldorf 1980, S. 59–101.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Liberatore, M.J.; Titus, G.J The Practice of Management Science in R and D Project Management. Management Science, Vol. 29, No. 8, August 1983, p. 962–974.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Refer to Cleland, D.I.; King, W.R (Eds.): Project Management Handbook, sec. ed. New York 1988; Reschke, H.; Schelle, H.; Schnopp, R. (Eds.) Handbuch Projekunanagement, Vol. I and II, Düsseldorf 1989 An exception is represented by the article of Souder in the manual of Cleland and King: Souder, W.: Selection Projects that Maximize Profits, pp. 140–164. The author, however, expresses a rather critical opinion about many models applicable to project selection.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wagner, H.M Operations Research: A Global Language for Business Strategy, in: Operations Research, Vol. 36, No. 5, September-October 1988, pp. 797–803, p. 798. Contrary to the title of the article, the essentially operational problems. After analysing Wagners examples, however, the cited applications have to be assigned to bulk and series production.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kilger, W Optimale Produktions-und Absatzplanung (Optimal Production-and Marketing Planning), Opladen 1973, p. 11

    Google Scholar 

  8. Refer, e.g., to the following work, containing a lot of bibliographical references: Slowinski, R.; Weglarz, J. (Eds.): Advances in Project Scheduling. Amsterdam 1989. A very astonishing fact is that none of the authors seriously discusses questions of computer-assisted capacity planning or problems of user surface design.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Souder, W.E.; Maher, P.M.; Baker, N.R.; Shumway, C.R. and Rubenstein, A.H An Organizational Intervention Approach to the Design and Implementation of RandD Project Selection Models, in: Schultz, R.Ö.; Slevin, D.P (Eds.): Implementing Operations Research/Management Science. New York 1975, pp. 133–152, p. 133.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Refer to Schelle, H Unternehmensleitung und Management-Informations-Systeme [Company Management and Management Informations System], in Schelle, H.; Molzberger, P. (Eds.) Psychologische Aspekte der Software-Entwicklung [Psychological aspects of software development], Munich 1983, pp. 237–271, here p. 258.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Souder et al ii I.c., p. 138.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Müller, D Methoden der Ablauf-und Terminplanung von Projekten [Methods of Project Process Planning and Scheduling] in: Reschke, H.; Schelle, H.; Schnopp, R. (Eds.) Handbuch Projektmanagement [Project Management Manual], Vol. 1, Cologne 1990, pp. 263311, herep. 283.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Refer to Bicker etc., etc.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Refer to the synoptic article by Whatley, N.M Cost/Schedule/ Technical Performance Risk Analysis, in: Stewart, R.D.; Wyskida, R.M. (Eds.) Cost Estimators Reference Manual. New York 1986, pp. 259–310.

    Google Scholar 

  15. A typical example is represented by the book of Heintel, P.; Krainz E.E.: Projektmanagement. Eine Antwort auf die Hierarchiekrise? [Project Management. A reply to the hierarchical crisis?]; Wiesbaden 1988. This book published by two psychologists contains hardly any references to quantitative methods but only deals with organization-psychological questions.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Müller-Ettrich, R Einsatzmittelplanung. Stand und Probleme der projektbezogenen Einsatzmittelplanung [Resource planning. Status and problems of project-related resource planning] in: Reschke, H.; Schelle, H.; Schnopp, R. (Eds.) Handbuch Projektmanagement [Project Management Manual], Vol. I, pp. 313–329, here p. 314.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dworatschek, S., Gutsch, R The Future of Project Management. Results of Theses Markets, GPM Nachrichten Nr. 12, 1987, p.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Concerning the neglect of description by business administration in general, referto Schelle, H.: Unternehmensleitung und Management-Informations-System [Company Management and Management Information System], in: Schelle, H.; Molzberger, P. (Eds.)

    Google Scholar 

  19. With respect to methodology refer to Schelle, H.; Schnopp, R.; Schwald, A Measurement of the User Friendliness of Project Management Software: A New Approach, in: From Conception to Completion, Proceedings of the 9th World Congress on Project Management, September 4th-9th 1988, Glasgow, pp. 1021–1029.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dreyfus, H.L.; Dreyfus, S.E Künstliche Intelligenz. Von den Grenzen der Denkmaschine und dem Wert der Intuition [Artificial Intelligence. Of the limits of the thinking machine and the value of intuition]. Hamburg 1987, p. 217

    Google Scholar 

  21. Morton, M.S.; Huff, S The Impact of Computers on Planning and Decision Making, in: Smith, H.T.; Grenn, T.R.G. (Eds.) Human Interaction with Computers. London 1980, pp. 177–201.

    Google Scholar 

  22. in: Schelle, H.; Voglmaier, E.; Madauss, IL: Symposium Life Cycle Cost, GPM-Arbeitstexte zum Projektmanagement [GPM working texts on project management], Munich 1986, pp. 209–225.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Refer to Schelle, H.; Seiler, R.: Expertensysteme im Projektmanagement. Versuch einer Bestandsaufnahme, [Expert systems in project management. The attempt to make an inventory] in Reschke, H.; Schelle, H. (Eds.): Projektmanagement. Beiträge zur GPM-Jahrestagung 1987 [Project management. Contributions to the GPM annual meeting 1987], pp. 331–340.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schelle, H. (1990). Operations Research and Project Management Past, Present and Future. In: Reschke, H., Schelle, H. (eds) Dimensions of Project Management. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-49344-7_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-49344-7_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-53157-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-49344-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics