Abstract
There are three ways in which philosophy, as I see it, is concerned with social psychological topics such as aggression:
-
1.
Conceptual clarification. Philosophy brings to bear its analytical competence on the analysis of key concepts, which those working with these concepts in their everyday research often lack the necessary distance to view in a sufficiently detached and comprehensive perspective. Philosophical analysis should not be seen as a rival, but rather as a cooperative enterprise.
-
2.
Rational criticism of methods used, interpretations imposed on the data, and possible normative proposals derived from these interpretations. In close cooperation with scientific methodology, philosophy contributes to the rational assessment of the credibility, import, and scope of a scientific theory in the light of such criteria as consistence, coherence, systematic unity, explicitness, rigor and evidential support.
-
3.
The last and most representative concern of philosophy in respect to psychological research is the integration of psychological results in an overall view of human nature.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aristotle. The Nicomachean ethics. London: Heinemann, 1934, bk. V, ch. 2, 1130 b 31.
Bradley, F.H. Appearance and Reality. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1930.
Barry, B. Political argument. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1965.
Hoerster, N. Utilitaristische Ethik und Verallgemeinerung. Freiburg/München: Alber, 1971.
Hume, D. Enquiry concerning the principles of morals, sect. IX, pt. 1. In: D. Hume, Enquiries (Ed. L.A. Selby-Bigge). Oxford: Clarendon, 1963.
Lyons, D. Forms and limits of utilitarianism. Oxford: Clarendon, 1965.
Marx, K. Kritik des Gothaer Programms. In: K. Marx und F. Engels, Ausgewählte Werke. Moskau: Progress, 1971.
Mackie, J.L. Morality and the retributive emotions. Criminal Justice Ethics, 1, 1982. 3–10.
Mill, J.S. Utilitarianism, ch. 5. In: J.S. Mill, Utilitarianism, liberty, representative government. London: Everyman, 1964.
Nozick, R. Anarchy, state, and Utopia. New York: Basic, 1974.
Perelman, C. De la justice. Bruxelles: Presses Universitaires, 1945.
Rawls, J. A theory of justice. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press, 1971.
Rescher, N. Distributive justice. A constructive critique of the ‘utilitarian theory of distribution.’ Indianapolis/New York: Bobbs-Merrill, 1966.
Topitsch, E. Über Leerformeln. Zur Pragmatik des Sprachgebrauchs in Philosophie und politischer Theorie. In: E. Topitsch (Ed.), Probleme der Wissenschaftstheorie. Festschrift für Victor Kraft. Wien: Springer, 1960.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1984 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Birnbacher, D. (1984). Social Justice and the Legitimation of Aggressive Behavior. In: Mummendey, A. (eds) Social Psychology of Aggression. Springer Series in Social Psychology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48919-8_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48919-8_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-48921-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-48919-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive