Abstract
This paper addresses the difficulties of cooperation in asymmetric dilemmas, interactions where two or more parties have mixed motives and receive different known outcomes if they mutually cooperate or mutually noncooperate. This context thus addresses dilemmas in general rather than the unlikely but more often studied symmetric dilemma. Observations from a series of studies indicate that, in dilemmas that provide one party with leverage and the other with potential regret, and which reduce the potential benefits of mutual cooperation for the party with leverage, the parties alternate asymmetrically in receiving valued outcomes. These observations provide the basis for a set of propositions that predict when alternation is most likely and when it is an equilibrium strategy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Axelrod, R. (1970): Conflict of Interest. Chicago: Markham.
Caplow, T. (1959): Further Development of a Theory of Coalitions in the Triad, American Journal of Sociology, 64, 488–493.
Murnighan, J.K./ King, T.R./ Schoumaker, F. (1986): The Dynamics of Cooperation in Asymmetric Dilemmas, unpublished manuscript.
Murnighan, J.K./ Roth, A.E. (1983): Expecting Continued Play in Prisoner’s Dilemma Games: A Test of Several Models, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 27, 279–300.
Pruitt, D.G. (1981): Negotiation Behavior, New York, Academic Press.
Pruitt, D.G. (1983): Strategic Choice in Negotiation, American Behavioral Scientist, 27, 167–194.
Rapoport, A./ Chammah, A.M. (1965): Prisoner’s Dilemma, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press.
Roth, A.E./ Murnighan, J.K. (1978): Equilibrium Behavior and Repeated Playing Prisoner’s Dilemma Games, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 17, 189–198.
Walton, R./ McKersie, R. (1966): A Behavioral Theory of Labor Negotiations, New York, McGraw Hill.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1988 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
King, T.R., Murnighan, J.K. (1988). Stability and Outcome Tradeoffs in Asymmetric Dilemmas: Conditions Promoting the Discovery of Alternating Solutions. In: Tietz, R., Albers, W., Selten, R. (eds) Bounded Rational Behavior in Experimental Games and Markets. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 314. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48356-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48356-1_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-50036-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-48356-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive