Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems ((LNE,volume 167))

  • 50 Accesses

Abstract

Problems of capital theory have been controversial both in the past and in the present. In 19 37 an article by Kaldor appeared in Econometrica under the heading “Annual Survey of Economic Theory: The Recent Controversy on the Theory of Capital”. More than 30 years later, in 1969, Harcourt published a survey-article in the Journal of Economic Literature: “Some Cambridge Controversies in the Theory of Capital”. (A substantially extended version of this article was edited as a book under the same title in 1972.) The present state of capital theory is best characterized by Bliss in the foreword of his book Capital Theory and the Distribution of Income [1975]:

“When economists reach agreement on the theory of capital they will shortly reach agreement on everything. Happily, for those who enjoy a diversity of views and beliefs, there is very little danger of this outcome”, (p.VII) There are several reasons for the permanent conflicts on the field of capital theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. A more detailed, elegantly written introduction is found in Dewey [1963].

    Google Scholar 

  2. A good introduction is given by Krelle, [1969], pp.63–72.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Circularity is used here and later on in the meaning use of a good to produce that same good i.e. use of a hammer to hammer out a new hammer; another example would be the sowing of corn in its reproduction. We also use instead of circularity recycling.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Using von Böhm-Bawerk’s simple interest calculation one obtains for the value of one unit of the consumption good after n periods: (1+nr) units instead of (1+r)n with compound interest.

    Google Scholar 

  5. An extensive representation of the concept of the average period of production is given by Fehl [1976].

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1979 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Faber, M. (1979). Introduction. In: Introduction to Modern Austrian Capital Theory. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 167. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48310-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48310-3_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-09121-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-48310-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics